19.4 C
Byron Shire
March 9, 2021

Why battery storage in Australia is unable to back up wind and solar

Latest News

Spring into Scavenge in Lismore this Saturday

Different, fun and rewarding are some of the words used to describe what's going to unfold in Lismore this weekend.

Other News

Government modelling fails to reflect women’s interrupted careers

New research to be released this week analyses two decades of Household, Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia (HILDA) Survey to estimate the actual labour force experience of women over their life and accounts for working when super is not paid.

Nurses call for an improved aged care sector

A ‘walk with nurses’ was held in Mullum last Friday, and aimed to highlight the concern aged care nurses have around fee structures, safety issues and staff training in order to properly care for our elderly.

Police operation Billinudgel Nature Reserve

Gary Opit, Brunswick Heads On 22 February residents on Jones Road noticed a major police operation with officers from eight police...

Question for Bob Carr

Simon Alderton, Murwillumbah I hope Kerry O’Brien asks Bob Carr (in their ‘conversations’ at Byron Theatre on Friday, 5 March) if...

Heritage Bruns?

David Kolb, Brunswick Head When Mathew O’Reilly spoke to Council regarding heritage listing for parts of Brunswick Heads he was quoted...

FB censorship

Dean Jefferys, Mullumbimby I feel concerned about the level of censorship on FB, Instagram, YouTube, MSM, local online groups and elsewhere...

Performance of the Ganawarra solar power station and big battery storage is hobbled by antiquated rules. Image RenewEconomy

Giles Parkinson, RenewEconomy

Most people would assume that if a battery storage installation – or even a pumped hydro facility – is located next to a big wind or solar farm, then the storage is being used to ‘back-up’ the wind and solar, smooth its output and deliver a ‘firm’ resource to the grid.

But in Australia that is not the case.

The archaic rules that govern Australia’s ageing electricity grid do not allow it, and the market rule makers and regulators are under pressure – from the likes of Tesla, Fluence, Genex, and even the major networks and gentailers like AGL Energy – to catch up and ensure that true renewable-storage hybrids can be allowed to work.

Tesla – the operator of world’s biggest lithium ion battery (100MW/129MWh) at Hornsdale in South Australia – says the current rules are reducing revenue possibilities and even encouraging storage developers to build layouts that are inefficient and may not be benefiting the grid as much as they could and should.

Tesla and Genex, the proponent of a world-first co-located solar and pumped hydro storage facility in Queensland, are pushing for new categories to be introduced that recognise the hybrid nature of such investments, their benefits to the grid, and help them avoid being billed twice (charging and discharging) by the network operator.

They note that market operators in other countries, such as the UK, and the US, have taken similar measures.

It is an issue that is vitally important as Australia looks to more storage as it expands its share of wind and solar. It affects ‘virtual power plants’, those facilities that link household solar and storage, as well as mega-projects such Tasmania’s battery of the nation project and the Snowy 2.0 pumped hydro scheme.

There is no doubt that batteries, like the Tesla big battery in South Australia and the Newman battery in W.A.’s Pilbara region have successfully demonstrated a wide range of abilities in their short time of the grid, well beyond the expectations of the market operators.

They have shown they can provide frequency control, inertia, and other essential grid services – holding the grid together in major events, and proving faster and more accurate than gas generators in responding to other events. Along the way, they have smashed cartels, and allowed the market operator to re-think how it manages the grid.

Some of those services earn those batteries money, but some of them don’t because the rules don’t allow it: Technology is so quick, advanced and multi-talented that it has out-run the rule makers and the regulators.

But one of the rules that really bothers storage developers is the one that makes it nigh on impossible for them to pair the output with that of the neighbouring solar or wind farm.

That is a major problem, because apart from newly unveiled Ballarat battery in Victoria and the Newman battery in W.A., most batteries and proposed pumped hydro facilities are sited next to large scale wind and solar farms.


The Tesla big battery is next to the Hornsdale wind farm, the Dalrymple North battery is sited next to the Wattle Point wind farm, the Ganawarra battery is next to the solar farm of the same name (pictured at top), the Tesla battery at Kennedy will be part of the wind and solar park of the same name, and the batteries at Bulgana (wind), Lincoln Gap (wind)Lake Bonney (wind) and Snowtown (wind and solar) will also be co-located.

There is a good reason for this co-location – they can share the cost of key infrastructure such as transformers, and poles and wires, if need be.

But a quirk in the rules means that they cannot actually combine the output of the wind and solar farms with the storage.

That’s why the Hornsdale Power reserve, as the Tesla big battery is known, operates separately to the Hornsdale wind farm, and the same will be true of the Ganawarra solar/battery and the Genex solar/pumped hydro. In the case of Genex, different contacts will be written for the solar output and the pumped hydro facility to different entities.

A recent report from the Australian Energy Market Commission to COAG energy ministers highlights the issue, noting that large scale storage connections face un-needed barriers to market entry. It is looking at changing the categories that currently limit their operation, and also review the network charges that imposes costs when the storage both loads and discharges.

Currently, the rules mean that batteries must be registered as both generators and consumers, and must be ‘scheduled’ i.e. able to do exactly what they are asked to do by the Australian Energy Market Operator.

Wind and solar farms, on the other hand, are categorised as either semi-scheduled. But neither category fits the combined assets of a wind and solar farm paired with battery or pumped hydro storage. And that’s a problem for developers because it limits their operations and their revenue potential.

There is also a problem with the need to register batteries as both a customer and a generator.  Tesla noted that it can only offer 63MW of frequency control under the current rules, whereas if it was operating as a single asset, it could actually offer more than 180MW.

The AEMC report recognises that changing the registration framework may reduce barriers to entry for such storage facilities, and so would better facilitate a competitive wholesale market.

Network operators Transgrid and Ausnet are on board, and AGL – which is looking to replace the ageing Liddel coal generator at least partly with renewables and storage – is also supportive.

As is AEMO. Chief executive Audrey Zibelman alluded to the problem while speaking at the launch of the NSW initiative for emerging energy, a program designed to put the equipment in place needed to deal with the inevitable exit from coal.

‘It is a massive disruption that is happening in this industry,’ she said. ‘One of the things we need to learn is how these technologies are going to work. There is a chicken and egg issue here: How to get investment in the resources if there is no market, and how do you create a market unless you know what the market needs are.

‘We could spend next three to four years doing market change rules, and find out in the end that they don’t actually work to get the kind of stimulus we need … versus saying, we actually need to get dispatchable power in, let’s create program to incent that kind of investment, and as we are doing that let’s look at the market change rules that we need to do to make that a sustainable change.’

AEMO, however, needs the AEMC to approve the change in rules, which as the proponents of the 5-minute settlement period found, is not easy. It took years for the proposal to be approved, and the implementation was delayed for another near four years.

As for storage, it is wrong to say that every wind and solar farm will need back-up from storage. There is simply no need, and much storage – such as the Ballarat battery – can provide valuable services located at key network points, and can also defray the cost of network and equipment upgrades.

But the issues highlighted here show why the market regulators and rule makers need to get their skates on, particularly after a new technology can show what it can do as successfully as the Tesla big battery has done.

This article first appeared in RenewEconomy and is reproduced here with permission.

Previous articleWomen’s beaches
Next articleDisease of greed

Support The Echo

Keeping the community together and the community voice loud and clear is what The Echo is about. More than ever we need your help to keep this voice alive and thriving in the community.

Like all businesses we are struggling to keep food on the table of all our local and hard working journalists, artists, sales, delivery and drudges who keep the news coming out to you both in the newspaper and online. If you can spare a few dollars a week – or maybe more – we would appreciate all the support you are able to give to keep the voice of independent, local journalism alive.

9 COMMENTS

  1. Most people would not assume that battery storage would back up wind or solar because battery storage can not do that.
    Even in an electric car you can only go a few hundred kilometres with battery storage even if the car is covered in batteries.

    • Len,
      Are we talking “back-up” or “supplement” here?

      e.g. apparently the Hornsdale battery facility has a capacity of 129 mWh – i.e. 129,000kWh.
      If my home battery of 6.5kWh can see me through a fair slab of the night (including peak cooking load at dinner time), should not the Hornsdale facility be good for around 19,000 to 20,000 homes covering the same period? Lets be conservative and say 18,000 homes. And the laws of physics on the electricity front may well reduce that a little further, but to my mind, that is still a fair whack of “back-up”. No, it is not indefinite, but certainly capable of providing short-term, emergency “back-up”

      Am not sure about your point on electric cars (which we probably both agree, are currently still fairly impractical on the Australian scene), but your point “Even in an electric car you can only go a few hundred kilometres with battery storage even if the car is covered in batteries” is probably pretty harsh.

      The range of an 85 kWH battery is given as being around 400km. Not sure what you envision with your theoretical electric vehicle “covered(?) in batteries”, but four or five batteries presumably would give a range of maybe 1,500 to 2,000kms (before a deduction for a bit for the extra weight). But as already stated, am confused as to what was the point you were trying to make. Or did you mean “convered in solar panels”? And if so, how is this relevant to the article? If indeed your theoretical vehicle was covered in solar panels, it would still be infinitely short of being a perpetual motion machine, but no doubt the end goal of extending its range would be achieved – admittedly to a quite limited degree.

  2. a few 100 km ?? hahah keep up cowboy , even tesla 3 does about 500 km ??
    the reason people think batteries are not working so good is because of the super low IQ of politicians
    and punters like lenny above !! “even if the car is covered in batteries” ?? hahah total rubbish lenny !!
    this is just the beginning and its already great !!

  3. Thank you for such a good article Echonetdaily. Battery storage can back up wind and solar generation as that is already being done where needed, and there is a new design for vehicles that does not even need batteries as the motion continues recharging as it goes.

    The main block to all of it, as you well point out, is backwards system use thinking, which is what needs to be radically improved. Then energy costs will drop dramatically and help everyone and the nation.

    Both clean energy and cannabis legalisation can bring in a lot more income and jobs with far less outgo and costs ..as is already being found out overseas and our politicians need to wake up to this.

  4. from one extreme to the other , Huston we have an IQ problem !! now , perceptual motion machines ??
    Jerry , even the sun is running down to nothing . cars powering them self’s hahahaaaaaa why bother ?

  5. Hi Echonetdaily,
    How is it that you allow incorrect information to be placed on your website from, in this case, Len Heggarty, when anyone who has the slightest knowledge of Tesla cars know what he is saying is absolutely untrue and only encourages others equally ignorant to hang onto nonsense.
    Like Facebook and Google don’t you as a publisher have a responsibility to have (volunteer?) factcheckers who can reject false information?
    Love the Echo and Echnonetdaily but …
    Jim Beatson
    Byron Bay

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Van life

David Pettifer, Uki In reply to today’s article by the ABC Van Lifers I believe there is an opportunity for both sides to benefit. There is a...

Buy and sell food app launches

Finding it too hard to purchase local produce via social media, partners Vanessa and Leisa thought there must be a better way.

Inflatable lifejacket self-service clinic for Ballina

An inflatable lifejacket self-service clinic will be held on Friday 19 March 2021 at Fishery Creek Boat Ramp, West Ballina.

Seapeace: the late Tony Maxwell’s wetland legacy

Many curious minds have pondered the purpose of the rice paddy-like waterbodies that scallop the contour lines out into the Ewingsdale coastal plain that can be viewed from St Helena Road.