Bypass cost breakdown finally provided

The approved Byron Bay bypass, aligned with Butler Street. Source Byron Shire Council

Hans Lovejoy

At last there has been a little transparency around how executive Council staff are managing the beleaguered Byron bypass project.

Slated at $24m, a costing breakdown has now become available after repeated requests. Currently the project is delayed owing to Council not following proper process.

With no councillor appearing to be concerned at the lack of accountability over the figures, Council watcher John Anderson asked the following question at Council’s ordinary meeting, held on November 28, 2019.

Anderson asked, ‘Will the Council finally realise that the issue of costs for the bypass is not going to go away and accordingly provide ratepayers with a fulsome breakdown of actual and proposed outlays in terms of legal costs, consultants, construction, noise, insulation etc so that the total of $25 million doesn’t invite ongoing speculation and suspicion about bad faith?’

The question was taken on notice by the mayor, and Council’s director of Infrastructure Services, Phil Holloway later replied in a statement – which is available online at Council’s website. The breakdown did not appear to include the cost of acquiring lands at the end of Jonson Street.

Cost breakdown:

The project budget is as follows:

Concept Design, Environmental Assessment, Detailed Design, JRPP, Land & Environment Court Case: $2,018,045.

Planning, Approvals, Survey and Design (including design, management and planning costs): $600,000.

Design update and pre-construction documentation: $135,000.

Civil Construction Contract: $13,575,023.

Service relocations and new services: $1,809,500.

Additional works, including noise mitigation: $2,069,600.

BSC Internal Administration and Project Management: $435,121.

Construction Contract Management and Administration: $490,500.

Contingency $2,867,211.

Total: $24,000,000.

The project is behind schedule despite Council refusing a request by former mayor and state MLC Jan Barham to delay the accepting contracts to investigate the ecological impacts.

John Anderson told Echonetdaily, ‘The answers provided by Council staff are hardly fulsome; they avoid detail and raise more questions than they answer’.

Further questions have been put to Council staff and Echonetdaily will publish them should a reply be given.

Further questions

They are: ‘Does this amount include GST? What are the ‘additional works’ where noise mitigation is claimed to be $2,069,600? What are ‘Service relocations and new services’? Is it laying of electricity cables and the like? If not, what are they? Will a further breakdown of ‘BSC Internal Administration and Project Management $435,121’ be available, ie, how many staff are involved and what their roles are? Why aren’t those general costs undertaken by staff? Is cost for the delays in the project coming from the contingency breakdown of $2,867,211?  Can contingency please be defined? The Echo understands that contingency for similar projects is generally around 10 per cent, yet this is a higher figure’.

Support The Echo

Keeping the community together and the community voice loud and clear is what The Echo is about. More than ever we need your help to keep this voice alive and thriving in the community.

Like all businesses we are struggling to keep food on the table of all our local and hard working journalists, artists, sales, delivery and drudges who keep the news coming out to you both in the newspaper and online. If you can spare a few dollars a week – or maybe more – we would appreciate all the support you are able to give to keep the voice of independent, local journalism alive.

2 responses to “Bypass cost breakdown finally provided”

  1. Phil says:

    30 years too late for this most obvious concept and at god knows how much bigger the price.

  2. Rachel Coorabell says:

    Phil, the obvious concept of transparency and accountability on an ecological disaster pushed through without consent? Yeah, you are right, it’s late, and it’s at a higher price. Thanks so much for raising this point, well said, and thanks for caring about protecting the Wetlands and the wellbeing of the region including the residents of Butler Street

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Echonetdaily is made possible by the support of all of our advertisers and is brought to you by this week's sponsor, Enspire Furniture & Homewares.