Dr Willow Hallgren
As human activity contributes more and more greenhouse gases to the atmosphere, such as CO2 and methane, this is having a major impact on the world’s oceans. The oceans have taken up around 40 per cent of the carbon dioxide emitted by humans since 1750 – the beginning of the industrial revolution.
Absorbing so much CO2 is making seawater increasingly more acidic, and this will, increasingly, cause the shells and skeletons of some marine creatures, including corals, plankton and shellfish, to dissolve. The oceans have also absorbed about 90 per cent of the warming caused by human carbon emissions since pre-industrial times.
This warming and acidification of the oceans is having profound impacts on both its physical structure and the myriad lifeforms who live in it and depend on it, including humans. It is also having major impacts on Australian fisheries, aquaculture and tourism.
Threat to coastal properties
The oceans are getting warmer and expanding, causing sea-level rise (along with land-based ice sheets melting). Coupled with more severe storms, this means that storm surges are increasingly inundating low-lying coastal areas, leading to disruptive and expensive flooding events. Extreme sea levels have occurred three times more frequently in the second-half of the 20th century than the first-half. Moreover, the rate of sea-level rise is increasing, and is predicted to rise at a considerably faster rate during the 21st century than it did during the 20th century.
Currently, there are hundreds of beaches and coastal communities around Australia that are at risk from coastal erosion. A few more decades of sea-level rise, and this number could climb into the thousands. The global average sea-level is predicted to rise by 45 to 82cm (above levels seen in the late 20th century) in the next 70 years – if we continue emitting large amounts of greenhouse gases. Of course, if any of the land-based ice sheets continue to melt unabated, the sea-level rises could be much larger, threatening the lives and livelihoods of millions of people living around the world’s coastlines. Both the Greenland and West Antarctic ice sheets are melting at record rates – and accelerating!
Needless to say, beach-front or low-lying waterfront property is probably not a good long-term investment. The burgeoning coastal development around Australia will undoubtedly face increasing risk due to storm surges and extreme water levels as greenhouse gas emissions continue to climb.
See the Great Barrier Reef before it’s gone
As communities around Australia are reeling from the unimaginably devastating ecological catastrophe of an unprecedented bushfire season, there is another ecological catastrophe unfolding, albeit at a slower rate. In the seas that gird our bushfire-burnt country an ecosystem with immense biodiversity and beauty – the Amazon rainforest of the ocean; the Great Barrier Reef (GBR) – is dying. Its death is both predictable and inexorable if the continued rise in global CO2 emissions is not halted.
Australians have now realised that the 2008 predictions of climate-change-induced severe bushfires by 2020, in the Garnaut Climate Change Review should have been listened to and acted upon. The devastating results are now all around us and have been choking us in both the countryside and the cities for months.
What Australian’s must also recognise is that ignoring the warnings about climate change and the GBR will have massive and possibly irreversible consequences. Between 1985 and 2012 there was a 50 per cent decline in coral cover due to human influences, and this occurred before the back-to-back massive coral bleaching events of 2016 and 2017, which devastated nearly half of the Great Barrier Reef. In 2019, a scientific study found an 89 per cent decline in the number of new corals settling on the Great Barrier Reef.
We must realise that the future of the GBR is now dependent on how quickly greenhouse gas emissions come down. If we keep global temperature rise to 1.5 degrees, the reef will survive, but in a degraded state, with less coral cover and less biodiversity. However, if greenhouse gas emissions continue to rise on their current trajectory, then it’s ‘game over’ and the reef will die completely, according to Professor Terry Hughes, the director of the ARC Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies..
The times they are a’changing
So what can we do to mitigate and adapt to the impacts of climate change on the oceans? First of all, vote for a party that has strong policies on emissions reduction – not for parties who try to use sneaky carbon accounting tricks to get away with doing as little as possible to address the root cause of climate change.
In 2018, climate change scientists agreed that ‘limiting global warming to 1.5°C would require rapid, far-reaching and unprecedented changes in all aspects of society… Global net human-caused emissions of carbon dioxide (CO2) would need to fall by about 45 per cent from 2010 levels by 2030, reaching ‘net zero’ around 2050’.
Australia failing
Needless to say, Australia is not on-track to even come close to this level of emission reductions, yet this is what the science says we must do to avoid more frequent climate catastrophes, such as the 2019/2020 bushfires, or mass coral bleaching events. This is the same science that predicted the recent horror bushfire season only 12 years ago.
Rethinking where we live
Beach nourishment may be able to extend the habitability of eroding coastlines, but not forever. It’s really time we start to rethink human settlements in low-lying areas – we should be aiming for an organised, well-planned retreat. This must be accompanied by the replanting of coastal ecosystems, such as mangroves and seagrasses, to buffer coastlines from stronger storms and to preserve as much coastal marine-life as possible. Ultimately, the uninsurability of beachside properties might be the deciding factor on future coastal developments and a planned retreat away from low-lying coastlines (the market can be an efficient tool if we allow it to be – hello carbon tax!).
Plenty of heating to come
Unfortunately, due to past emissions, there is already considerable heating of the planet in the pipeline. It’s not going to be enough to simply stop emitting greenhouse gases. We need to sequester as much CO2 as we can, in order to stabilise the climate as much as possible and limit future impacts. Although ecologically risky, many marine geoengineering mechanisms have been proposed, such as fertilising the ocean with iron filings or other nutrients to stimulate phytoplankton growth, and growing kelp forests – which grow very quickly and absorb huge amounts of CO2.
Other ways the oceans might help us fix the problems we have created involve tapping into their enormous potential for renewable energy in the form of wave and tidal energy, and offshore wind farms. Reducing our reliance on fossil fuels, and diversifying the types of renewable energy we can draw on are our best approach to securing our long term, sustainable, relatively inexpensive energy future.
Further reading
https://www.iucn.org/resources/issues-briefs/ocean-and-climate-change
https://phys.org/news/2019-09-climate-oceans-friend-foe.html
https://www.barrierreef.org/the-reef/the-threats
Author
Dr Willow Hallgren is an earth-system scientist who studies the impact of climate change on ecosystems and biodiversity, the feedbacks between vegetation and the climate, and how policy can influence climate change, by changing how we use the land.
Willow has previously worked as a climate and biodiversity scientist in government, industry, and academic roles in both Australia and the USA at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). She was also previously the Science editor of Monash University’s student newspaper Lot’s Wife.
She is a city escapee of many years now and is currently hiding out among the hill tribes of the beautiful Tweed Valley.
More Planet Watch articles
Will Morrison’s gas-led recovery delete the IPCC’s belief we need climate...
Most Australians know the news, or have had firsthand experiences themselves, of two years of floods, fires, coastal erosion, and storms, both here and overseas. In fact Australia has warmed on average by 1.44 ± 0.24 °C since national records began in 1910.
‘Unprecedented’ but not unpredicted – we are now suffering from our...
As Australians head into another election season just as many parts of the east coast are recovering from ‘unprecedented’ flooding since February, and the national psyche is still reeling from the trauma of the ‘unprecedented’ Black Summer bushfires before that, it is critical now more than ever to vote according to your environmental conscience and fear for the future.
Ethical investing goes prudential
Ethical investing is the idea of using your money to make the world a better place rather than simply chasing the greatest financial return. It seeks to account for people and planet, not just profit.
On track to three degrees of warming
Our planet has warmed by 1.1 degrees, on average, since the Industrial Revolution, and Australia has warmed by 1.4 degrees since 1910 when records of temperature measurements began.
What’s going on with gas?
David Lowe According to the prime minister, we’re in the midst of a ‘gas-led recovery’. Until about five minutes ago, the gas in question was methane (mostly found using unconventional techniques like fracking) but now he’s also talking about hydrogen,...
Is hydrogen part of a sustainable energy future?
There’s a lot to like about hydrogen. For starters, it’s abundant. Hydrogen can store excess renewable power. When liquified, it’s more energy intense than fossil alternatives. In a fuel cell, it can generate electricity. When it’s burned, the only by-product is water.
Human activity, climate change risk more pandemics
New research has revealed climate change, environmental degradation and human activity are creating a perfect storm for more deadly pandemics like COVID-19. Scientists from the University of Western Australia (UWA) say COVID-19 has highlighted the critical need to reduce human impacts...
Planet Watch: Environmentally sound building
Globally, buildings are responsible for a massive share of energy and material consumption. Sustainable building movements are trying to change this, some by going back to the past, and some by diving head-first into the future.
Planet Watch: Are humans the disease?
Humans have told a lot of stories about how awesome we are, but there's one emerging hypothesis that casts our species in a very anti-heroic light. In terms of the planet, are we behaving like a disease?
Planet Watch – Top three environmental issues
With so many environmental crises occurring, it’s hard to focus on just three issues to provide an update to Planet Watch readers – but here's our top three...
One would have thought that “Conservative” people would have been conservative of nature and conserving of nature’s dependency on the climate which was and still is crucial to its existence and ongoing survival.
But no, instead, “Conservative” people, vote for governments that typically strive to do the complete opposite.
By voting to destroy life, rather than protect, nurture and help it to flourish, “Conservative” people have now earned the distinction of being called modern day Barbarism …
How we progressively evolve past this, if at all, is most curious indeed..
Dr Hallgren , thanks for the update regarding what
The future holds for us humans ..
Those computer models sure have been a
Unreliable source of predictions to date
Totally agree the planet is warming no doubt!!
However Dr since 1880 the earths temperature
Has risen 0.76 degrees hardly a emergency Dr ?
you and many other scientists base future
Sea level rises, planet warming on computer
Modeling” Why ?
Dr a couple of Questions.
Could you please explain where sea level rises
Are at a emergency phase in Australia?
Especially in the Byron Shire where our own
Council has declared a emergency?
If the planet is warming a such an alarming rate
And most scientists the ones hooked on government grants are all in agreement
That fossil fuels are the contributing factors to such Global Warming than why Dr were the
Temperatures 1.3 to 1.5 warmer in medieval times
In Europe 2000 years ago what were the contributing factors to such Global Warming
2000 years ago Dr , no fossil fuels, no huge
Population’s? Answer please . In layman’s terms
Not one Scientist in the past 50 years has had
A global warming prediction come true ?
And can give you the perfect example Tim Flannery
Absolutely a waste of hard earned taxpayer’s
Money wasted on Flannerys predictions
Embarrassing? Not to Mr Flannery
is CO2 a pollutant Dr ?
Dr iam a sceptic and for good reason ,find it
Amusing that people on this forum suggest
That minimising their carbon footprint
Will make no difference really?
And nor dos Australia’s contribution to Global Warming? Mention this and they go into meltdown!
As you know Dr that if Australia Shutdown
For 6 months it would not make one single bit
Of difference to Global Warming. Irrefutable!!
And for the Record iam not a supporter of coal
Or Adarni on the grounds that it will misuse
Our greatest resource Water !!
So when you all take global warming seriously
And eliminate all that is connected to coal from your lives. The very prosperity you all enjoy today
Is because of coal , will we all take you seriously
“You can convince people to believe anything
Except the truth ”
“We are a land of sweeping plains of droughts
And flooding rains ” now that is a fact and the truth”
Ps .could you please include the major
Polluters in the conversation regarding Global warming. China, india, America, etc
‘The oceans have taken up around 40 per cent of the carbon dioxide emitted by humans since 1750’
Given 97% of CO2 is produced by nature and 3% man, does this mean 1.2% of all CO2 has been absorbed by the oceans and are you saying this 1.2% is causing acidity? How does the ocean distinguish between mans CO2 and that produced by nature and not absorb it as well? also does the heating capacity of CO2 decline as concentrations increase?
Well said. This needs to be broadcast widely!
It’s all very well for the results of much scientific investigation and reports to be published predicting these dire consequences, (frightening the populace!) but they are of no use when those in power/government take no notice at best, and deny the findings at worst. The upshot is that no action is taken even though solutions have been offered. . And here we are…exactly as predicted.
Boy, are Australian politicians slow learners! Plus their generous pay & entitlements are not linked to productivity or outcomes, not like the rest of us…even more galling!
The article suggest planting kelp forests to absorb carbon dioxide – but where should we site them?
Only in the one or two weeks I have read reports of long established kelp forests in Tasmanian waters dying off because of increasing water temperatures. This has led not only to loss of carbon storage, but also to the loss of myriads of sea creatures who lived there, including the much treasured abalone.
Thanks Serena,
It’s easy to wring our hands in dismay at the lack of action from the current crop of politicians, but we live in a democracy, so theoretically if enough people want real action on climate change, then we can vote these people out. The sort of action on climate change that’s needed will only come if people stand up and demand it at the polling booth.
If you’re frightened by climate change (and we should all be!), do something: join a climate action group, write to your local member of both State and Federal Parliament (or call them!), and make the environment and climate change your priority when voting at the next election.
Thanks Serena. It’s just a pity that there
are still those who refuse to listen. Please
continue your work-findings & ignore the
dead-beats who won’t learn because it’s
easier to raise an uninformed opinion. I
would imagine that ‘talking to a blank
wall’ has side effects just like a broken
record played at the wrong speed.
Forget the critics.
Spoken like a true socialist!! Refuse to listen!
Others views don’t matter
Because they don’t fall into line
With yours !! Uniformed opinions
More like informed views .
If you are so concerned about Coal
Stefanie, turn your electricity of ?
100% renewables at your residence?
Thats only one of the privilege’s
You enjoy because of fossil fuels
Irony !!
‘If you’re frightened by climate change (and we should all be!)’
You make a good point Willow, this is what the Club of Rome had in mind when they dreamed this scam up.
here is a quote from its founder Aurelio Peccei in 1982 ‘We are creating a global environmental problem that’s going to frighten people into wanting global government.’
Its heartening to see there are some young people waking up to what is going on, one being Naomi Seibt, Germany’s answer to Greta , who says ‘Don’t panic THINK’
I have renewables & my use is very small… Barrow.
And Anton – you may have got the quote, Peccei’s,
from me about 6 month’s ago. Either way, your
constant stirring surely needs a game change. I’d
reckon most of us are dead-eared by now. Think
-ing never hurt anyone. Word clutter is totally
inefficient & different & preys on the ME-ME.
Yes understand Stefanie, However you objections
To coal usage is relentless, so if you are taking
Advantage of base load power which is fossil
Fuels to power any of your house , brown and black coal ..this would go against
Everything you stand for would it not ?
With Respect Stefanie , bit hypocritical !!
John White:
John White – yes, it’s true that increasing temperatures in the oceans will lower the productivity of kelp forests and may make some areas unsuitable for such forests, but other areas, like the Arctic ocean, may become more suitable:
“Global warming may lead to northern expansion of kelp forests in some areas.” (Filbee-Dexter et al., 2019)
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921818118301826
Also: https://www.independent.co.uk/environment/arctic-underwater-forests-global-warming-climate-change-a8914761.html
I agree with Barrow
Barrow. Can you please explain “baseload” power? We have all the tech we need to phase out dirty coal power. Only thing lacking is Govt policy! BTW “Democratic socialism” sounds like a great idea to me. This current system is killing us all slowly and surely, unless you’re one of the 1% wealthiest of course, and then you’re immortal!
No, Barrow is not immortal; uninformed & big
on following the small herd’s more like it.
He’ll wake up in time after the rest of us have
done the heavy lifting. Anton’s included as
well.
Stefanie if Global Warming is such a concern in Australia , then why are the Greens not running
This country? You seem to be a expert on lecturing
All who are skeptical regarding Global warming
That would be the majority, the majority are not some small herd as you are implying Stefanie
And for the record the chosen one the NZ
Prime Minister who also lectures the world on
Global Warming will not be see a second term Why ?
research what NZ are doing for GW
With the emphasis on the diary industry .
Oh the irony! And do say this with much respect
To the Kiwis, who incidentally are some of the most intelligent people on the planet! And Jeremy base load is fossil fuels and the prosperity you enjoy today is Due fossil fuels . And if it is killing us you slowly? We all have a choice!! move to another country that may have less than 1.3 percent
Of Global emissions you may be happier, if you can
Find such a country that has all that Australia offers.