21.5 C
Byron Shire
December 8, 2022

The influence of activist judges

Latest News

NSW Labor candidate announced for Ballina

Andrew Broadley has been named the NSW Labor candidate for Ballina for the March 2023 election.

Other News

Editorial – Wokie dokey

Last Thursday’s Council meeting was an example of when a good idea gets kiboshed because the people proposing the idea are considered crazy conspiracy theorists.

Local waterpolo team thriving on friendship

The Byron Bay Bullsharks women’s waterpolo team have played their way into second place on the Far North Coast...

NSW SES continues its efforts on International Volunteers Day

NSW SES volunteers continue to assist flood impacted communities across inland NSW as extensive flooding moves to downstream locations.

Medal storm for locals at pickleball tournament

Thirty Northern Rivers pickleball players won medals in the first ever NSW regional doubles tournament last weekend in Ballina. The...

Development risk

Thank you, Aslan for your editorial. The public are to suffer a great deal in the future if all...

Byron Council’s renewable energy projects uncertain

Two major renewable energy projects promised by Byron Council are now facing an uncertain future, after an unsuccessful bid for federal funding left the Council struggling to pay for both of them.

With the all-important mid-term elections pending in the United States, the legality of abortion has been on my mind.

I watch aghast at the fallout from the retrograde decision by the Supreme Court; however, it is a timely reminder of the history here.

In Australia, the act of procuring an abortion was legislated and fully criminalised in all states and territories until very recent times. In NSW, there was a maximum penalty of ten years’ imprisonment.

This is right up until it was legalised on October 2, 2019.

So, I know you are asking yourself, how can it be that it was a legislated crime, but it was effectively permitted from the late 1970s?

If it was illegal, then how come it was virtually unpoliced or prosecuted in all that time?

Well, the answer lies in the legal acrobatics of some rather brave activist judges before it was all the rage.

The defence of necessity

Up until that point, the defence of necessity was a very narrow and limited defence to criminal charges.

If you were driving an injured person to hospital and went through a red light, the necessity defence may well apply.

Or you broke into a chemist to get some bandages to stem a stab wound for example.

But the essence of the defence is that there must have been no other alternative.

So, escaping from a prison for fear of sexual assault, or trespassing by squatting owing to homelessness would never suffice.

Because you had a choice – like being assaulted, reporting it to the Governor, or living on the street.

Or all three.

Enter stage left: an unlikely hero by the name of Clifford Menhennit, Scotch College student and then Supreme Court Justice in Victoria, who determined that the defence of necessity applied to an abortion charge if ‘necessary to preserve the physical or mental health of the woman concerned’.

This was expanded in NSW to include ‘economic or social harm presently or in the future’. Such a defence has never applied to any similar crime – radical indeed.

The legal fiction here in Australia was only to be outdone by the tortured fancy adopted by the US Supreme Court in 1973 with Roe v Wade.

The Constitution provides protection from arbitrary deprivation of life, liberty or property.

In that clause, the Supreme Court found a right to privacy.

And it is that right that was said to be abridged by the criminalisation of abortion.

This undoubtedly saved countless lives.

Millions of women benefited.

Whatever the obvious moral rightness of the decision, it was always an exceptionally long legal bow to draw.

It was ripe for overturning.

The lesson from this lengthy legal walk down a short factual pier is that the situation in the USA could have been us.

Judge-made legal fiction 

The judge-made legal fiction of justification in Australia was always tenuous, brittle and weak.

Power to change laws is best exercised by parliament, rather than the fickle courts as judges change over time, waxing and waning like the moon.

On the other hand, reform on victimless crime where parliament makes it tends to stick – can anyone imagine the reversal of same-sex marriage?

It might happen that marriage equality ends in the USA, again because it is based on arguable constitutional interpretation from the Supreme Court.

I (for once) agree with Justice Samuel Alito, in the US Supreme Court, who quoted legendary conservative Justice Scalia’s view that: ‘The permissibility of abortion, and the limitations upon it, are to be resolved like most important questions in our democracy: by citizens trying to persuade one another and then voting.’

And in the end, that is all the Supreme Court has done – returned the power to make laws to the parliaments of the various jurisdictions responsible.

The reason women will die and be imprisoned, and that child victims of sexual assault will be forced to have babies, and that poorer women will be grossly overrepresented in the forced pregnancy stakes is only indirectly because of the Supreme Court.

The real fault, the ultimate crime, lies in the slow dead hand of the legislators in the recalcitrant States.

I read that a majority (60 per cent) of Americans support a woman’s right to choose – if that is the case, then democracy should take its course.

But without compulsory voting, and where fundamentalist Christianity replaces reason with faith in energised voters, we can but hope.

Still, abortion is the number one issue motivating electors to vote this time round, so fingers crossed.

The Wall Street Journal describes abortion law as ‘a defibrillator for the Democrats’.

And I’ve looked – where in the bible is abortion outlawed anyway?

♦ David Heilpern is Dean of Law at SCU and a former magistrate.


Support The Echo

Keeping the community together and the community voice loud and clear is what The Echo is about. More than ever we need your help to keep this voice alive and thriving in the community.

Like all businesses we are struggling to keep food on the table of all our local and hard working journalists, artists, sales, delivery and drudges who keep the news coming out to you both in the newspaper and online. If you can spare a few dollars a week – or maybe more – we would appreciate all the support you are able to give to keep the voice of independent, local journalism alive.

8 COMMENTS

  1. David have you noticed that tricky little clause in their bible, ” Thou shall not kill” ?
    However, I concede, law should be determined by democratic principles, but in reality nothing is further from the truth. The law is a weapon, owned by ‘the powers that be ‘( i.e.. the wealthy, the government of the day, that criminal organisation AKA the police force, and the Pope ).
    This weapon is used to maintain the status quo and subjugate the population. Have a look at defamation law.
    If the law was fairly and justly implemented , then the term ‘activist judge ‘ would be meaningless and ‘legal fictions’ wouldn’t form the foundation of our society. If it wasn’t for the ‘legal fiction’ that Eddie Mabo ( who was in fact a south pacific islander) could be used to justify aboriginal Land Rights, much of our headlong rush into apartheid could have been avoided . This is one of many convenient lies relied upon by the legal system and instigated by ‘activist judges’.
    Anything worthwhile in this land has been accomplished in-spite of the law. Justice, common sense or democracy has never been an available option for Australians.
    Cheers, G”)

  2. I agree with your comments David except wrt “the number one issue motivating voters this time around”. That may in fact be “cost of living”, and not the freedom of women to control their own bodies.
    I sure hope people will make the effort and vote for Democrats. Sadly for some people there voting is not easy.

    • Hi Citizen, and thanks for your thoughts. I fear you are correct! I got that straight from the New York Times, who were making the point that this was the most “motivating “ issue, as opposes to the “underlying” ones.

  3. Thanks David for succinctly explaining the often misunderstood decision by this current Court in relation to Roe. You’re right, it’s now up to voters and their representatives on a state level to decide how their communities feel about abortion which is, arguably, how it should be. We should also remember that the Federal Government in Congress has had the opportunity to enshrine the right to abortion in law but has singularly failed to do that relying on the false security of Roe. It’s really Washington Democrats who have allowed that.

  4. Well gee David, where in the Bible does it say pedophilia should not be committed?

    By your statement, it logically seems you would think therefore that this means that should not be legislated against either.

    Can you use your great legal mind to clarify that for us all?

    • Hi Shane, I am happy to clarify that. You are correct, it does not say that pedophilia should not be committed. However there is a consensus amongst religious and non that pedophilia is is an evil and ought be outlawed. With abortion, it is predominantly the Catholic and other christian churches that lead the so called pro-life movement. And they do so on the basis that their faith forbids abortion. But my question is how do they come to this view. The bible doesn’t say this. So, logically of course I don’t think we should repeal laws that forbid pedophilia. Your logic seems a trifle twisted to me.

  5. This is an extremely important issue, but! The number one issue in the mid term USA elections and every election should really be, are you for democracy, accountability and justice in the USA or are you one of Trumps, racist bigoted KKK, Evangelical, QAnon traitors, because that is by far the most serious issue pending! The Republican party is now nothing more than a syndicate of criminals!

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Varroa mite Red Zone expansion

Varroa mites are the most serious pest to honeybees worldwide, and can destroy honey bee colonies if left unchecked and the current eradication zone has been expanded.

Tyalgum ready to celebrate the festive season

Tyalgum are looking forward to a very exciting Festive Season as the alternative route to town is now upgraded and they are looking forward to an exciting range of events are on.

Take action against 15 months jail for climate protester

Northern Rivers locals are gathering in Lismore this Saturday to protest the imprisonment of non-violent climate activist Deanna ‘Violet’ Coco who stopped one lane of traffic on the Sydney Harbour Bridge in April.

Agritourism policy forced upon LGAs

The NSW Department of Planning and Environment (DPE) has ignored Byron Shire Council’s urgent request to delay the forced adoption of the NSW government’s agritourism policy. The policy came into effect last week in all local government areas (LGAs).