15.4 C
Byron Shire
May 24, 2022

Thus Spake Mungo: Turnbull’s economics 101

Latest News

Computers donated to home schooled kids in Lismore

There nothing like the support of the CWA ladies to help get you through a disaster and the Lismore CWA Evening Branch were very pleased to be able to help their community once again to supply computers to some flood-affected Lismore kids.

Other News

False altar of ‘globalism’

Since moving to Australia in 2007 I have watched nothing but its sacrifice on the false altar of ‘globalism’....

The floods are leaving people homeless and families split

There was a housing crisis on the Northern Rivers, then we had the floods of 2022 and the issue has left increasing numbers of people homeless and struggling to find alternative accommodation.

Sculpture distilled at Husk

The inaugural outdoor exhibition, Sculpture Distilled, opens this week at Husk Farm Distillery and promises the opportunity to get...

Will Morrison’s gas-led recovery delete the IPCC’s belief we need climate action now?

Most Australians know the news, or have had firsthand experiences themselves, of two years of floods, fires, coastal erosion, and storms, both here and overseas. In fact Australia has warmed on average by 1.44 ± 0.24 °C since national records began in 1910.

Inflated Scomo

During his term, Scomo made plenty of decisions that helped lead us to the inflation we face today. When...

Suspicious house fire in Casino ends in charges

NSW Police say that man has been charged following a suspicious house fire.

Our mild-mannered prime minister has become an uncompromising economic fundamentalist. ‘The law of supply and demand,’ he proclaimed, ‘cannot be suspended.’

Well, up to a point, Mr Turnbull; actually it is not a law but something of an ideal, a belief that if the market was absolutely free and safe from interference by pesky governments that its invisible hand would always even things out in a harmonious equilibrium.

The idea is that is when supply gets tight, demand rises, and vice versa. Thus when there are a lot of jobs available, employers will not have to offer high wages to attract staff. On the other hand when there is a scarcity of workers, employers have to cough up.

Given that Turnbull is constantly boasting about the number of new jobs created on his watch, you might think that that the current stagnation in wages is entirely as it should be. But our leader is going more Keynesian – if we offer more money to the employers, especially the bigger ones, it will follow as the night the day that there will be more investment, more jobs, higher wages and a chicken in every pot.

Well, in a perfect market, untouched by human intervention, that might be a chance. But in the real world – and in particular the real world of Australia – it is very unlikely to work like that. The Australian market, and particularly the tax regime, is complex, highly regulated and skewed beyond recognition from the elegant simplicity of Economics 101.

And given that the skewing is overwhelmingly in favour of the wealthy, the idea that reducing their taxes will result in more than the smallest trickle down to the masses is no more than wishful thinking. They have many other ways to dispose of a windfall.

Apart from the obvious distortions to the system, like dividend imputation, family trusts, negative gearing, capital gains discounts, innumerable exemptions ranging from legitimate tools of trade to advertising costs and, most absurdly, political donations, favourable treatment for big superannuants and all the smaller lurks and perks involving travel, entertainment and the massive rort of attending professional conferences in the south of France, there are plenty of other ways to make sure that whatever tax breaks a compliant government provides end up not with their workers, but with the directors and shareholders – the capitalists.

We have already seen that in the United States, where the vast majority of those who will be the beneficiaries of Donald Trump’s cutting of the company rate from 35 per cent to 21 per cent have shamelessly announced that they will use the loot for share buy-backs, paying off debts or losses, or simply enhancing corporate profits.

Given that the Australian model has already seen large increases in the profit share do almost nothing for wage earners – those who have not been retrenched in the perennial quest for higher dividends and larger executive bonuses – there is no sensible reason to assume that they will suddenly afflicted by a social conscience on this side of the Pacific.

Or indeed anywhere else: parts of Europe are searching for an accord somewhat in the manner of the one devised by Bob Hawke in 1983, in which a deal can be negotiated so that employees have some guarantee that they receive at least a share of whatever largesse becomes available. Turnbull’s fundamentalism would regard that as interference with the market – as if the market had not already been molested beyond recognition.

But in any case, what is the real argument for big corporate tax cuts? As has been already pointed out, profits, after the slump after the end of the mining boom and the hit from the Global Financial Crisis, have recovered and are now doing very nicely thank you. And the claim that Australia will be left behind by the current rate (25 per cent for those up to $50 million a year and 30 per cent for those above it) can only be sustained by comparing apples and oranges.

The evidence – as opposed to the theory – is stark: trickle down economics has almost never worked and when it has, it is because there really has been something like a free – well, freeish – market. Australia has never had one of those any time in the last 200 years.

With all the fiscal fiddling from successive, mainly coalition, governments, the effective rate in Australia is about 17 per cent – in the bottom half of the OECD scale. In particular it is lower than the USA’s 21 per cent, which is far more straightforward. Our tycoons are in no danger of being left behind, even in the unlikely event they pay what the Australian Tax Office valiantly but often vainly attempts to enforce. And as for the multinationals – forget it. They are, as always, laughing all the way to their havens in the Bahamas.

As the former Australian Industry Group chief and Reserve Bank board member Heather Ridout admitted last week on Q&A, the issue has become a polarising one, which is why Turnbull, having emerged from his beach at Point Piper, is trying to frame it as an example of Bill Shorten’s anti-business agenda.

He has to be negative because when you get through the waffle, rant and bullshit, it is pretty hard to make a positive case: the mere assertions about the law of supply and demand, the declaration that supply-side economics is simply common sense, just won’t cut it.

The evidence – as opposed to the theory – is stark: trickle down economics has almost never worked and when it has, it is because there really has been something like a free – well, freeish – market. Australia has never had one of those any time in the last 200 years and is now so entangled with scams and shenanigans to have become more akin to a command economy – which is fine for Turnbull, as long as he issues the commandments.

John Hewson, a Liberal leader who was once a real free marketer (he has since reformed) once spoke of an insight he discovered when trying to get to terms with the nation’s economy. It was, he said, a bit like a rubber sheet, best undisturbed. Whenever you gave one bit of it a poke, it meant another lump bobbed up somewhere else.

Turnbull is looking at more than a poke: his so-called enterprise tax scheme would belt the rubber sheet like a sledgehammer, a wrecking ball – and grateful moguls would no doubt bob up all over the place. But it would not follow (except in Turnbull’s version of Economics 101) that too many workers would be elevated above the unwholesome coverlet.

Polarising, yes; perhaps good politics among his own class warriors. But an inexorable economic law? In your dreams, Malcolm.


Support The Echo

Keeping the community together and the community voice loud and clear is what The Echo is about. More than ever we need your help to keep this voice alive and thriving in the community.

Like all businesses we are struggling to keep food on the table of all our local and hard working journalists, artists, sales, delivery and drudges who keep the news coming out to you both in the newspaper and online. If you can spare a few dollars a week – or maybe more – we would appreciate all the support you are able to give to keep the voice of independent, local journalism alive.

8 COMMENTS

  1. Mild-mannered Malcolm Turnbull has become an uncompromising economic fundamentalist. He proclaims: ‘The law of supply and demand, cannot be suspended.’ That is his principle.

  2. The problem is well explained, inexorable. The real problem is the alternative. The environmentalists would have us all growing our own carrots, cars and planes every other day until none at all, second rate steel, two refugees to every family, and top up welfare while we dig through our refuse for saleable recyclables. The Shorten solution is to reward anyone with a gripe, if they’re of voting age. Supply and Demand economics is not perfect, like your chances at Keno is not good. But what else?

  3. I have some super, not millions but thous. You remove business incentive, for big or small, equally none will risk their future in it. 9 of 10 businesses collapse within a year or two, so pressure more that, the normal, risks capitalism itself. And the alternative is anarchy, as some Greens espouse, or your realthing Command ecomy, as the essentials of socialism espouse, given the fact real communism fails within weeks. So what else?

  4. The point of the Invisible Hand, as per Adam Smith, is that it is always in the pocket on the worker & consumer.
    It does NOT distribute gains proportionately else there’d be no such beast as profit.
    By definition, an employer must pay the employee less than the value of the output of the aforesaid.
    Mungo is letting his his Dismal Science training overwhelm his social sensibility.

  5. Today The ABC reveals that 1 in 5 big corporates don’t pay tax or haven’t paid tax for a number of years. So where is this urgent need then for Mal & Scotty to cut Australia’s corporate tax rate and hand out $65billions. I mean if they ain’t paying anything now they still won’t be paying anything under Mal & Scotty’s trickle down hocus pocus….they ain’t paying tax and they ain’t paying those higher wages either which contradicts the logic of Mal & Scotty. It will be $65billions just pissed away and a lot of it will be overseas.

  6. The “laws” of supply and demand are no such thing. They are, at best, psychological generalisations. Enunciated without any fuller psychological theory, they are nonsense.

    What happens when the supply of labour gets close to being equal to the jobs available? An emergency is declared, immigration is stepped up, people are urged to have more children, employers band together to minimise wage growth, unions are crippled and strikes delcared to be a disgrace, or are made illegal—as appears to be the case now.

    Very little pressure is put on employers in large businesses by a few people changing jobs. It is only mass action—that is, strikes— that lead to wage growth.

  7. The economic rationalist/pundits above are living in in a vanishing world and what is vanishing is the environment which enables the capitalist system.
    Unfortunately for us all we have largely destroyed our environment which conventional economics has always regarded as a free resource.
    Capitalism with its reliance on constant growth is dying fast requiring two more worlds of resources and pollution sinks to continue. And this does not even take global warming into account.
    So you can argue all you like about how many angels fit on the head of a pin but we need a drastically new economic model if we are to survive as a species.

  8. If the law of supply and demand worked in labour markets, then aged care nurses would have experienced huge pay rises over the years because of the shortage of labour. Instead many aged care facilities cannot fill shifts, even nursing agencies cannot supply staff and Assistants in Nursing are paid less than check-out clerks in supermarkets. It seems that biscuits have a value while our vulnerable aged do not.
    Then we consider CEO compensation which has skyrocketed in recent years because apparently there is a shortage of people wanting to do that work!

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

COVID-19 update for the NNSWLHD – May 23

The Northern NSW Local Health District reports that to 4pm yesterday, Sunday May 22, there were 40 COVID-19 positive patients in hospital in Northern NSW, with one of these in ICU.

Elliot ecstatic about Albo and confident of a Richmond win

While her win in Richmond has not yet been confirmed, Justine Elliot is very happy about the overall result for Labor and a new government.

Australian politics transformed

Following an election like no other, Australia looks set to change course on climate and corruption, with the Coalition's Scott Morrison being prised from office and Anthony Albanese about to form a new Labor government with the support of Greens and teal independents.

Kevin Hogan returns for Page

Though the coalition government he represents is now in opposition, National Party candidate for Page, Kevin Hogan, has been returned to his seat and yesterday he released a statement to all media.