Planning panel put on notice over West Byron developments

Tuesday’s (June 19) meeting of the Joint Regional Planning Panel hearing submissions from the community into the proposed West Byron developments. Photo Aslan Stand

Chris Dobney

If any member of the Joint Regional Planning Panel (JRPP) was in doubt that Byron residents are in total opposition to the plans of two groups of developers to carve up the West Byron wetlands into 667 housing lots, they would have been thoroughly disabused after four hours of passionate and informed speeches by opponents at Mullumbimby Civic Hall on Tuesday evening (June 19).

Out of the 30-odd speakers there was not a single speech in favour of the proposal.

The meeting had been a long time in coming and was the first opportunity for residents to have their say in four years, following the much maligned 2014 community consultation that was described at the meeting as a ‘farce’.

The five-member panel that will ultimately decide the fate of the proposals consists of: chair Garry West, a former National Party government minister; former bureaucrats Stephen Gow and John Griffin; and neighbouring councillors Katie Milne (Tweed Greens mayor) and Vanessa Ekins (Lismore Greens councillor).

Cr Ekins sent her apologies but Mr West told Echonetdaily she would be provided with ‘the recordings of the sessions and all of our notes’.

Signs of protest outside Tuesday’s (June 19) Joint Regional Planning Panel meeting. Photo Chris Dobney

Unsuitable site

Ecologist Dailan Pugh and biologist Mary Gardner opened with speeches about why the environment is so unsuited to any form of residential development.

Speaker after speaker then raised the familiar issues: the bulk and scale of the developments; the huge amount of fill required to floodproof the site; the massive increase of traffic on Ewingsdale Road; a massive sound barrier running along the roadside the length of the development; the increased stress on services from schools to sewage; and the detrimental impact on koalas and other wildlife.

Byron Environment Centre co-ordinator John Lazarus also questioned the validity of any of the plans in the light of the state government’s impending legislation effectively legalising short-term holiday letting, saying that with sale prices likely to top the $1 million mark, homes would likely be snapped up by ‘Airbnb investors’.

Water 1.5m below surface

But it was the words of Byron-based developer Eric Freeman that cut through with the chairman, who was seen to raise his eyebrows as Mr Freeman recounted his experience developing the adjacent Byron Industry Park in the 1990s.

‘We found groundwater at just 1.5 metres below the surface,’ he said adding it was partly caused by ‘water being discharged through the sands from the [then] gravity-fed sewage treatment plant (STP).

Mr Freeman said he subsequently worked with Council to build a vacuum STP to fix the problem but that ‘hundreds of houses’ had been connected since then and he believed it was once again failing.

‘We created road pavements to one metre depth,’ he said, adding they were now ‘rippling like waves on north Centennial Circuit’.

No approval to use drains

Dramatic evidence also came from Tom Vidal of the Belongil Catchment Drainage Board, which is responsible for two major drains responsible for West Byron, the industrial estate and the surrounding areas.

‘We are already finding it difficult to manage the system,’ he told the panel. ‘It’s more complex than any other system in NSW and possibly Australia.’

But then he dropped a bombshell: the drainage board must approve in writing of any development.

According to the developers’ plans, its main drain would be the recipient of all the stormwater from the two estates.

‘We’ve never been contacted and they never responded to requests to get in touch,’ he said.

‘Expert advice suggests their drainage issues are not adequately addressed but they want to discharge into our drainage system without asking, advising, or even consulting us.’

‘Currently we receive 14 megalitres of water a day from the site. By 2025 we estimate this will increase to 25 megalitres (10 olympic swimming pools) per day.

‘If our drainage district is flooded, the town will flood. That is a real possibility and a real threat,’ he said.

Farms becoming flooded

Mr Vidal’s comments were backed up by Skinners Shoot property owner Anthony Pangallo, who said farmers backing on to West Byron found their lower paddocks ‘turning into lakes’ with the amount of water being injected by the STP and believed if the developments went ahead, ‘our properties will become so flooded they will be unfarmable’.

Another landowner, Tim Hochgrebe said his property on Melaleucca Drive ‘is exactly where all the water is going to go.’

‘Despite being direct neighbours to both DAs, we have not been contacted by either developer to discuss it,’ he said.

And their positions were further backed up by Byron mayor Simon Richardson, who recounted how he had once inhabited a tepee at Belongil Fields and found the water rising around him during a rainstorm.

He added, more pointedly, that as the owner of the drainage system, council would categorically refuse permission for the developers to use it for stormwater purposes.

‘1950s designs’

On a lighter note Cr Richardson said Council was not opposed to development that was ‘best practice’ and ‘creative’.

But he said ‘this looks more like something from the ’50s – and even that is probably disrespecting architects and town planners of the 1950s.’

At the conclusion of the session chair Garry West attempted to reassure the audience the panel would not simply be acting as a rubber stamp.

‘My track record, and that of the panel, is that we do listen: we listen to the community and we listen to the planners at Council.

‘My intention is that when we get the Council report we will go onsite in a detailed way and then go back to Council staff with questions,’ he said.

He added there would be another opportunity for the community to address the panel before its ultimate decision was taken.

8 responses to “Planning panel put on notice over West Byron developments”

  1. Sally says:

    The community should get the final say on this matter as it is the local community that is impacted the most.

    I haven’t seen too many West Byron pro-development demonstrations in Byron Bay, so the answer should be pretty black and white. Why does the town that is so unique have to suffer at the hands of a few greedy developers or landowners?

    For all the points mentioned in this article, there is no good reason for this to be approved. If we want to increase housing in the township without making the footprint larger then possibly look at incentivising existing owners of blocks within the current township area and allow them to place secondary dwellings or dual occ their large blocks, and upgrade the old housing in the process. Only approve if environmental and infrastructure impacts are truly taken into account.

    West Byron will make Byron lose its charm and look like another sprawling Gold Coast suburb. If people really want that, then they can pack up and head up the highway.

  2. Liz L says:

    An excellent range of speakers who did the community proud in presenting the relevant concerns. I was a bit amazed though that no reference has been made to the unfortunate fact that our hospital and emergency services are all housed in the thick of the Ewingsdale Road chaos. A bit of a recipe for disaster if the traffic flows double?

  3. Len Heggarty says:

    A bloc of Byron residents sat seriously to try and block the plans of two developer groups to sift and shift the development of the West Byron wetlands into 667 housing blocks while those residents were armed with four hours of passionate and informed speeches at Mullumbimby Civic Hall on Tuesday evening (June 19).

  4. Rossco Phillips says:

    No more need be said, really…

  5. SJ says:

    Well done to all who spoke at the meeting.

    Session chair Garry West says ‘My track record, and that of the panel, is that we do listen: we listen to the community and we listen to the planners at Council.”

    I thought the track record was ‘The JRPP has an almost 100 per cent approval rate across all NSW panels over the last few years;…’ – according to this 2017 article…

  6. Donny says:

    This development proposal is totally wrong on so many levels that it should never have got this far into any planning process. It’s so inappropriate, it deserves to be refused. NO WEST BYRON.

  7. Pamela Rose says:

    When the seas rise there is nothing to stop the water coming up Belongil Creek, which will then flood surrounding acreages. If we want to stop Byron Bay from flooding, then this development will be a disaster.
    Let us fully oppose this Gold Coast style development, for all our sakes, and for the wildlife. There is a canal proposed with the surrounding land built up – anybody seen the Gold Coast lately.??
    As the current mayor said once – There is a good reason why this land has not been developed – it is unsuitable for development.

  8. D.D says:

    Okay, so there are a small group of people who want to make these developments. And/or wish to profit for them. Then, there is a long list of thousands of consequences. The small group of people don’t want to know about the consequences. They just say ‘no no, there’s profit for us’.
    Well, these individuals that want the development. You have been and you will be, legally, put on Notice.
    You WILL be responsible for ALL the consequences. If you want your West Byron D.A’s, then you are going to suck up the consequences also. Legally, financially – you will wear full responsiblity for everything that happens.
    You will not be able to turn your backs or run away. You make it, you break it, you own it, you wear it, you pay for it – or you go to prison for it.
    Consider that, first.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Become a supporter of The Echo

A note from the editorial team

Some of The Echo’s editorial team: journalists Paul Bibby and Aslan Shand, editor Hans Lovejoy, photographer Jeff Dawson and Mandy Nolan

The Echo has never underestimated the intelligence and passion of its readers. In a world of corporate banality and predictability, The Echo has worked hard for more than 30 years to help keep Byron and the north coast unique with quality local journalism and creative ideas. We think this area needs more voices, reasoned analysis and ideas than just those provided by News Corp, lifestyle mags, Facebook groups and corporate newsletters.

The Echo is one hundred per cent locally owned and one hundred per cent independent. As you have probably gathered from what is happening in the media industry, it is not cheap to produce a weekly newspaper and a daily online news service of any quality.

We have always relied entirely on advertising to fund our operations, but often loyal readers who value our local, independent journalism have asked how they could help ensure our survival.

Any support you can provide to The Echo will make an enormous difference. You can make a one-off contribution or a monthly one. With your help, we can continue to support a better informed local community and a healthier democracy for another 30 years.”

Echonetdaily is made possible by the support of all of our advertisers.