Aslan Shand
What will Byron Bay look like in the future? How will the town be shaped, grow, change and develop?
Two key documents are currently open for comment on how this will be achieved: the Draft Residential Strategy and the Byron Bay Town Centre: Review of Planning Rules, also known as the design control plans (DCP). Comment on this document has been extended to 15 November owing to lack of public advertising or media releases on the changes.
One of the key concerns raised has been the idea of removing the floor-space ratio (FSR) that traditionally determines the bulk and scale of buildings in favour of ‘design excellence’ as the means of assessing future developments.
‘There are some good objectives including the pedestrianisation of the town and reducing car dominance,’ says Dr Phillip Pollard, who sits on the Urban Design Panel for Lake Macquarie City Council, which uses a similar approach to design excellence. However, he says the document in its current format is ‘a well-intentioned but naive document’.
‘I’m concerned that the draft won’t achieve the stated objectives and could be quite counterproductive.’
Independent panel
Dr Pollard, a former Byron Shire councillor who also sits on the state panel for significant developments and advises a number of other councils on planning and design, says that managing development through a design-excellence process can be done but it needs a strong set of provisions for it to work effectively.
‘You need a rigorous process to have a hope of achieving design excellence,’ Dr Pollard said. ‘To achieve that you need a truly independent panel to provide advice to council.’
In particular Dr Pollard said the provisions put into the Local Environment Plan (LEP) need to be strong if they are to stand up in court. ‘It needs teeth for the LEP to be held up in court, as it is the LEP that carries greater weight in court than the DCP.’
Former Byron Shire Mayor and state MP Jan Barham said, ‘The Masterplan identified that better design of the built environment is required, and I support that, but it needs to be a fully informed and cautious approach. The Byron Bay Masterplan Implementation Plan stated that Floor Space Ratio (FSR) would be amended to either remove the need, or to establish a FSR that supports the built form aspirations for the town centre. This hasn’t been done.’
The DCP also recommends extending the building height to 11.5m in the area between Lawson Street and Bay Lane (behind the Beach Hotel) stating that this would not affect the view of the town from the beach due to the angle of the land.
Local architect Christine Vadasz has said that on a recent kayak trip in the Bay ‘looking back it still has that sleepy town look because it is still low rise’ and that it is important to keep the town ‘quirky and different’.
‘But the town has three ways to go – up, out or in,’ she said. ‘We don’t want to go out or up, so the place has to become more dense. We need to be more creative with open spaces, they don’t have to be big but they need to be creative with vegetation, and at a human scale.’
Many yeare into the future, Byron Bay will look like Byron Bay.
Beware this paragraph:
“The DCP also recommends extending the building height to 11.5m in the area between Lawson Street and Bay Lane (behind the Beach Hotel) stating that this would not affect the view of the town from the beach due to the angle of the land.”
Councillors surely don’t know the building height can be moved because the people of the town have not been asked. Ask the ratepayers. Once the building height is moved it could be moved a lot more upwards once it was moved once. Then that height extension is coupled with a view of the town from the beach, No one goes to the beach to view the town. You extend the building height to view the beach. I wonder what the angle is and what is selling?
I have recently returned from Venice and totally agree with your density option. How does a beautiful built environment make a rather shabby lagoon look beautiful?
Byron has the opportunity to get it right. Don’t follow the mistakes of other built environments. Locals and tourists love to see something unique. Stop high rise, franchises etc Marthers vineyard in the USA have made these choices and so can we. Keep trying.
I can tell you a few things that WONT HAVE changed;
The third world country condtion of the roads and street lighting.
The regardless of lawful wearing of helmets and lighting for push bike riders.
I’d like to see rail expanded to at least mullum and lismore to provide a useful local means of transport throughout the region reducing the need for cars and buses , considering it’s all sitting there why aren’t we utilising this wonderful asset more ? The last thing needed is more traffic ?♂️
Absolutely Mat and apart from the obvious reduction in traffic what a great option to support our tourism throughout the region
Favorite comment
Smart energy comment
Care for the planet coment
Let’s hope people please do it