20.7 C
Byron Shire
November 27, 2022

Brunswick locals reject boarding house

Latest News

A treasured community asset

The Bowlo, a treasured community asset in Bangalow very popular with young families, is now destined to be part...

Other News

Guitar Journeys & Symbiosis

Two of the Gold Coast’s iconic artists, Felicity Lawless and Black Rabbit George (aka Tijuana Cartel frontman Paul George)...

Hat tricks and big runs part of the action in second grade cricket

Tintenbar East Ballina remain on the top of the Far North Coast Cricket second grade ladder after beating the Ballina Bears at Fripp Oval last Saturday.

Poppy seed tea causes hospitalisations and product recall

People are advised to check the poppy seeds in their kitchens following a nationwide recall of poppy seed products linked to poisoning. 

Former priest to face court over alleged historical child sexual assault – Richmond PD

A former priest will face court today charged over alleged historical child sexual assault offences in Mallanganee. In November 2021,...

The fight for patient ratios and safety continues

As nurses and midwives around the country fight for better staff-to-patient ratios the union decided to strike again on Wednesday.

Appeal to locate man missing from Lismore area

Police are appealing for public assistance to locate a man missing from the Lismore area.

Jude Brazenor with the 11 hundred signatures against the Kollective dev

A group of Brunswick Heads locals made their voices heard on Thursday morning at the Byron Shire Council planning meeting. The group handed the council a petition calling for the rejection of plans to construct a boarding house known as ‘the Corso’ in Bayside next-door to the preschool at 94 Kingsford Drive.

The petition received over 1,000 signatures from locals worried about the affordability, desirability and ultimate viability of the project.

Similar boarding house projects by Byron based developer, the Kollective, have been accused of failing to deliver on their promise of delivering affordable housing for the community.

A previous development at 116 Stuart Street in Mullumbimby had promised to relieve the acute shortage of affordable housing in the area but had left locals surprised when the apartments were advertised between $500 – $600 a week, far greater than the median price for the area.

Annie Radermacher, one of the protesters present at the council meeting says that the government was offloading its responsibilities to provide affordable housing to the private sector without any due diligence.

‘This is meant to be a plan to incentivise the private sector to take over from social housing, but no one really wins here except the developer.

‘They get tax right offs and many regulations waved under the pretence that it is affordable but once they hit the market that is often not the case.’

We need supply

Michael Murray, a property buyers agent at Byron Property Search, likened protesters who opposed such developments as ‘selfish hoarders’ denying the rights of others to own a home in the area as they do.

‘We no longer have a housing crisis here but rather a housing catastrophe,’ he said.

‘Byron Shire has the least medium density lots out of any northern rivers shire. If these people do not like these developments what alternate solution do they recommend?’

Byron Shire has recently been inundated with newcomers from major cities looking to settle in the area making it one of the most desirable areas in the country and leaving many with few options. This has resulted in a strong push from the industry and the government to rapidly boost supply.

Not a local centre  

The project was also called out for not satisfying zoning requirements. The plot sits on a B1 zone which requires it to be used for small scale business and community uses to serve the needs of nearby residents.

Residents claim that this responsibility is not met by the proposed boarding house. Speaking passionately to the council chamber, Lisa Sandstrom, another Brunswick local, proclaimed:

‘This is meant to be a local centre that serves the bayside community but all it has is a tiny tokenistic grocer and café. Why doesn’t the Bayside deserve to have a local centre?’

The project developers held a public consultation meeting earlier this year prior to the council DA submission. Their plans show that the development will include a café, grocer, co-working space and six shop top houses along with the boarding house.


Support The Echo

Keeping the community together and the community voice loud and clear is what The Echo is about. More than ever we need your help to keep this voice alive and thriving in the community.

Like all businesses we are struggling to keep food on the table of all our local and hard working journalists, artists, sales, delivery and drudges who keep the news coming out to you both in the newspaper and online. If you can spare a few dollars a week – or maybe more – we would appreciate all the support you are able to give to keep the voice of independent, local journalism alive.

4 COMMENTS

  1. This fraud called “affordable housing” is a Trojan horse, completely unethical. It is legalised theft and fraud in the guise of housing for less privileged residents. It’s a load of bollocks!

    Michael Murray from Byron Property Search claims “We no longer have a housing crisis here but rather a housing catastrophe”.

    The “housing catastrophe” we have is the combination of greedy developers parading as the “good guys”, rapacious real estate agents whose only motive is fat commissions, parasitic short-term holiday rentals (Airbnb and its analogues) that remove housing from the long-term residential market, a state government keen to relieve itself of social-housing responsibilities, and a bloody incompetent council in the developers’ pockets. Scumbags, all of them!

  2. Michael Murray’s comment that locals who object to this inappropriate el cheapo so called ‘affordable’ development are ‘selfish hoarders’ is way off the mark. Selfish is the term that should be applied to property investors who buy up (often multiple) properties for short term letting at inflated prices thereby causing a catastrophic loss of properties available for low income long term renters. Such selfish I nvestors should be limited to one extra property beside their primary residence and the favourable tax treatment they enjoy for investing in housing abolished

  3. Good on Bayside residents.

    Yes we do have a ‘housing catastrophe’. It was created by selfish, greedy people buying up housing as an investment and renting them out for a fortune on Airbnb, not by people owning one home to raise a family.

    Tax lurks and negative gearing need to be abolished asap so that young people can afford to buy a family home once again.

  4. Tax concessions, negative gearing, Airbnb regulation and controlling the behaviour of property investors and real estate agents are all well beyond the powers of the local council.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Curious statements on Assange

The couple of letters under the headline of ‘In Defence of Julian Assange’ contained some curious statements in an attempt to justify the unjustifiable.  Marc...

Emergency radio tower

An emergency radio tower is proposed for Teales Lookout, Koonyum Range. It is proposed by the telco authority via Catalyst One Pty Ltd, via Amalgamotion...

Ballina water supply

A recent Echo article regarding Rous County Council’s plans to access Alstonville ground water through bores for its Future Water Project 2060 via an...

For the record

Since early January 2020 when the COVID-19 pandemic started, when the world population started to be informed of the new health danger facing everybody,...