23.8 C
Byron Shire
September 23, 2021

Controversial Iron Gates Master Plan withdrawn

Latest News

Tweed Council says ‘No’ to State government taking their developer income

The proposal to reduce the ability of local councils to collect money from developers to support their infrastructure by the NSW State government has been rejected by Tweed Shire Council.

Other News

New Nesbitt Park mountain bike skills course in Lismore

Though Lismore is currently in lockdown, the city has inaugurated a new sporting activity in Nesbitt Park that will make residents want to enjoy outdoors as soon as possible.

Reece Byrnes re-elected as Tweed Deputy Mayor

With many many local councils are juggling the elections timetable owing to COVID-19 restrictions, and last night the Tweed Shire elected their Deputy Mayor.

COVID-19 updated venue of concern excludes Lismore’s Workers

The Northern NSW Local Health District (NNSWLHD) have updated their list of venues of concern for the Lismore LGA.

Champion a cause

Delighted to read Dan Reade’s letter (September 1) calling for everyone to take a new cause to champion. I...

Controversial Iron Gates development open for comment on 24 September

The community has 30 days to comment on the latest amended DA for the controversial Iron Gates development at Evans Head before it goes before the Northern Rivers Planning Panel once again.

Second confirmed COVID case in Lismore

Acting Chief Executive Northern NSW Local Health District, Lynne Weir says there one new case of COVID-19 has been confirmed in a resident of the Northern NSW Local Health District.

The sensitive site of the controversial planned Iron Gates development, which the state government has refused to consider without a Master pPlan. Photo Supplied

The controversial 184 lot subdivision including 175 residential lots, and 3 residue lot Iron Gates development at Evans Head is back in the spotlight following the withdrawal of the Master Plan (MP) by the developer.

Evans River is currently in ‘poor’ health and locals are concerned that the proposed Iron Gates development will push the river into further decline. Image supplied.

The developer has been attempting to develop the site, through a range of different companies, since at least the 1990s. The DA went to the Land and Environment Court (L&EC) in 1997 and the L&EC removed development consent for the development due to the serious breaches of the development application (DA) that the developer had undertaken. They were also ordered to do approximately two million dollars worth of remediation at the site that has never been done. According to advice provided to Richmond Valley Council, those Court Orders are still outstanding.

Further unauthorised clearing took place at the site in 2016.

Master Plan withdrawn

The legislation under which the current DA was submitted in 2015 requires that a MP is completed in conjunction with it. The MP went on exhibition on the Department of Planning, Industry and Environment (DOPIE) on 24 February 2016, however, it has now been withdrawn with no public announcement by the proponent or government to let the community know.

Richmond Valley Council’s (RVC) DA Tracker shows the last data entry for the current DA was September 2019 and Council’s website is still spruiking an amended development application (DA2015/0096) advising that ‘prior to the determination of the DA’, the NSW DOPIE ‘must endorse a master plan for the development’ with ‘All enquiries regarding the master plan’ to be ‘directed to the Northern Region Office of the Department’.

The current applicants are listed on RVC DA tracker as Planit Consulting and GoldCoral Pty Ltd.

Dr Richard Gates from Evans Head Residents for Sustainable Development Inc. said today that ‘it was particularly disappointing that both state and local governments have failed to keep the public informed of the status of the Iron Gates development. It’s almost two years since we heard anything yet a number of us made comprehensive submissions about both the DA and the Master Plan which deserve a reply.

‘This controversial development has cost ratepayers and taxpayers a great deal of money, time and effort. To retain confidence in the planning process in NSW there should have been a timely statement telling the public what has happened to the development. At the very least those who had made submissions regarding the proposal should have been informed about the withdrawal of the Master Plan and the reasons for that withdrawal,’ he said.

Dr Gates said that it was understandable that the Master Plan was withdrawn as it contained ‘many shortcomings’ as a planning document.

‘The land for the development is still, inter alia, the subject of Land & Environment Court Orders for remediation, a planning nightmare for bushfire risk, part of a government-identified wildlife corridor that should be preserved, and a major intact coastal Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Landscape that should be retained for future generations (Riebe, 2016).’

A section of the cleared land at Iron Gates, Evans Head. (supplied)

A National Park

National Parks tried to acquire the Iron Gates land on at least four separate occasions but were unsuccessful for reasons not publicly known.

‘The acquisition could have been used for capacity building for the Aboriginal Community in conjunction with National Parks. It seems that there is still the opportunity for this to happen particularly now that the importance of the area to the Bundjalung Nation has been widely recognised through Native Title completed Determinations and in particular through evidence provided by the local Bandjalang People.

‘This is a live issue highlighted by the failure of the state government to follow through on its promised Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Bill (2018) for the protection of Aboriginal Cultural Heritage. The promising draft Bill has disappeared leaving protection of Aboriginal Cultural matters to antiquated and deficient National Parks legislation, a throwback to an earlier era,’ Dr Gates said.

‘The land should never have been zoned for residential development in the first place. The land was rezoned in the early 80’s, forty years ago next year. The community has tried to have the land rezoned to a more appropriate “environmental” zoning over many years in keeping with what it is, with the last attempt occurring when Council was developing its latest LEP. Council wasn’t interested in what the planning and legal experts had to say demonstrated by its failure to attend the meeting organized by the community. Richmond Valley Council and its predecessor Richmond River Shire Council have always been hell bent on residential development on the site despite enormous legal bills for ratepayers, and the inappropriateness of the site for residential development.

A section of the Iron Gates site that was cleared in 2016 without approvals. (supplied)

Fire risk

‘Make no mistake, the Iron Gates is an enormous firetrap for residential development. If anyone is attending to any of the debate about our recent disastrous fires, any plan for residences in this location is just plain dumb and dangerous. Richmond Valley Council, in particular, which was badly affected by fire, should be recommending against the development.’

Future of the site

Dr Gates said that the best outcome they see for the community is for the land to be rehabilitated as required by the L&EC and for it to be zoned ‘environmental’.

The land should be ‘resumed by the State Government as an “offset” for coastal lands being destroyed elsewhere,’ Dr Gates said.

‘The developer should be paid out for the unimproved capital value of the land less the cost of rehabilitation. And the land should become part of the National Parks estate. That would be the right thing to do from a number of perspectives including appropriate land use, the public interest and recognition of the long-standing connection to Traditional Owners and opportunity for capacity building.’

A spokesperson from the Department of Planning, Industry and Environment told The Echo that ‘The Master Plan was withdrawn by the proponent in a letter to the Department on 19 July. The development application is currently under consideration by Richmond Valley Council.’

♦ Updated with DPIE comment on 19 August.


Support The Echo

Keeping the community together and the community voice loud and clear is what The Echo is about. More than ever we need your help to keep this voice alive and thriving in the community.

Like all businesses we are struggling to keep food on the table of all our local and hard working journalists, artists, sales, delivery and drudges who keep the news coming out to you both in the newspaper and online. If you can spare a few dollars a week – or maybe more – we would appreciate all the support you are able to give to keep the voice of independent, local journalism alive.

2 COMMENTS

  1. I am pleased that finally someone has the decency to inform the community of what is actually happening with the proposed Iron Gates Development. Thanks for the article explaining the facts. I still do not understand how the Land and Environment Court can order a developer to pay $2m remediation of the Iron Gates from the1990’s and that work has still not been carried out. Somebody please explain. It is a disgusting sight out there and something needs to be done about it.

  2. Helen, the developer withdrew the Master Plan for the Iron Gates development around mid-July but no-one bothered to let the public know. Not council, not the norther n region planning panel, not DOPIE.
    Apparently the developer is in discussion with Richmond Valley Council now about the DA and its future. We all had thought that once the Master Plan was gone that that would be the end of it. But maybe not so.
    As to the remediation orders for the Iron Gates, they still stand according to legal advice provided to Council and the work remains to be done. Council should make that legal advice available to the public.
    The original development company went into liquidation and there were no funds for the remediation work. Perhaps developers now need to put up a financial surety to make sure such work is done. Interesting that the same developer is now back with the current proposal. If he owns the land and the Court Orders attach to the land, he should do remediation work before anything else happens.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Cadwallader determined to win support for new water science team as part of Dunoon Dam campaign

Cr Cadwallader has taken advantage of a local government rule allowing councillors to reintroduce a failed motion without having to wait three months if they have the signed support of at least two other councillors.

More Byron COVID contact locations

Northern NSW Local Health District has been notified of a number of new venues of concern associated with a confirmed case of COVID-19 from a worker on I’m a Celebrity … Get Me Out of Here! following charges for breaching public health orders.

Ring of steel called for as Byron and Tweed locked down – again

Councillors and members of parliament from across the region are calling for greater restrictions on who can come to the Northern Rivers and other vulnerable regional areas from COVID hotspots in NSW.

A matter of choice

I have chosen to receive a vaccination. Others have chosen not to. Unless we are living in some totalitarian state, that should be the end of...