14.9 C
Byron Shire
June 3, 2023

Lismore defers quarry blasting decision amid koala concerns

Latest News

Getting Real About The Voice

Responding to Ian Pratt in an attempt to ‘get real about the Voice’. The proposal does not challenge the...

Other News

Tragic death of two men in Yamba

NSW Police have today spoken to the media after the body of a man and a teenage boy were located inside a home at Yamba yesterday.

Burst main forces temporary water supply cut in Lennox Head

Ballina Shire Council’s crews are attending to a water main break that has occurred on Allens Parade in Lennox Head this morning.

Private partnership sought for bioenergy facility proposal

Byron Council have been forced to explore the possibility of a public private partnership to fund its planned  bioenergy facility in Byron Bay.

Bakersfield Mist

Following a successful run in Brisbane, PlayHavoc in association with Ad Astra is thrilled to be bringing Stephen Sachs’...

Théo’s family mark fourth year of his disappearance  

Today is the fourth anniversary of the disappearance of Théo Hayez, an 18-year-old Belgian backpacker who was last seen leaving Cheeky Monkeys bar in Byron Bay at around 11pm on May 31, 2019.

Priorities? Compliance

Despite a ‘tough budget environment’, where Council can’t find $15,000 per annum to maintain a tree planting initiative on land it manages, there will be $250,000 spent on employing two more compliance officers and purchasing another ‘enforcement’ vehicle.

One of the koalas spotted at a quarry at Ruthven during an inspection this week.
One of the koalas spotted at a quarry at Ruthven during an inspection this week.

Darren Coyne

The Lismore City Council last night deferred making a decision on whether blasting could go ahead at a quarry heavily populated by koalas.

Councillors were set to make a decision at last night’s meeting, with staff recommending that the application be refused.

Operators of McDonalds Quarry at Flood Reserve Road, Ruthven, had lodged an application to vary the quarry’s consent conditions to allow up to five blasts each year.

The quarry was first approved in the early 1990s for the production of 6000 cubic metres per annum.

That rate was increased to 14,700 cubic metres in 1996, given the quarry an expected life of 73 years.

But the applicants have told the council they encountered hard rock at much shallower levels than expected, and that blasting would help break up that rock for processing.

They want approval to carry out up to five blasts a year, but council staff recommended against issuing the approval because the applicants had been unable to provide information on the potential impacts of koalas.

But last minute information lodged by the applicants prompted councillors last night to support a motion from Cr Mathew Schebel to defer the decision until a workshop was held to consider the new material.

The council’s development and compliance manager Peter Jeuken emailed councillors just prior to the meeting saying the applicants had advised that a revised “Assessment of Impacts of Quarry Blasting on Koalas” had been prepared by JWA Pty Ltd dated 13 July 2015.

Mr Jeuken said that while the applicants were still to provide information on a number of areas of concern, the revised report formed ‘a clear conclusion that the proposal will not result in any significant impacts upon koalas’ if recommendations were followed.

An added recommendation would be: ‘Post blast koala monitoring should be reported in an annual report to council and OEH (Office of Environment and Heritage) after the first 12 months of blasting.

‘Data collected during the monitoring survey should include age class, reproductive status, health status, tree species sighted in, and location by GPS. ‘There should be an interpretation of results and a report should be completed by a suitably qualified and experienced ecologist.’

Mr Jeuken said it was unlikely further studies would provide any evidence not before councillors, and he said ‘A decision to defer the application and request further information is unlikely to be of any material benefit given discussions with the applicant’.

Nevertheless, after protracted debate, councillors did vote to defer their decision so that the information provided in the enhanced report from JWA Pty Ltd could be considered.

The workshop is expected to be held ‘as soon as possible’, and a report will go back to the council before any further decisions are made.


Support The Echo

Keeping the community together and the community voice loud and clear is what The Echo is about. More than ever we need your help to keep this voice alive and thriving in the community.

Like all businesses we are struggling to keep food on the table of all our local and hard working journalists, artists, sales, delivery and drudges who keep the news coming out to you both in the newspaper and online. If you can spare a few dollars a week – or maybe more – we would appreciate all the support you are able to give to keep the voice of independent, local journalism alive.


  1. Council staff seem to be on the ball enough to recommend refusal.
    The GWA report saying ‘no significant impact’ is typical. Where is the precautionary approach to protect these threatened species? To go ahead and blast then monitor the impacts is too late for the koalas impacted. Why do always koalas come last when it comes to profits for humans?


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Police compassion

Mandy, you said (Echo, 17 May)]: ‘There’s not many 95-year-olds I wouldn’t be able to overpower if necessary’ and ‘to disarm a 95-year-old with...


It is with great concern and disappointment, but not surprising, we have to declare that the brief hope we had for a nuclear-weapons-free future,...

Israel’s formation

In his apologia for Israel, what Danny Wakil failed to mention about Israel’s formation is significant.  From his description you’d think the founding of Israel...

Backlash Stan Grant

Extraordinary negative and callous statements regarding Stan Grant in the recent edition’s Backlash section. Grant was a terrible host? Grant made the show unwatchable?...