13.8 C
Byron Shire
July 13, 2024

Thus Spake Mungo: Brandis, the PM’s mate

Latest News

Losing town water access

I grew up and live in Mullumbimby, and I know locals have a strong opinion about the Byron Shire...

Other News

National NAIDOC Week – Keep the Fire Burning! Blak, Loud & Proud

This year’s National NAIDOC Week theme honours the enduring strength and resilience of First Nations peoples and culture.

Fingal residents reject controversial 10pm trading hours for Fingal Store site

The Fingal Store DA is back in front of Tweed councillors tomorrow and staff have recommended approval – but residents say a new DA is required due to the significant changes made to the DA.

Policy ambition, age and conservatives 

The sad state of conservative politics has again dominated the world stage this week, with the Tory wipeout in the UK, and a chaotic result in the French elections, reducing President Macron’s Centralist Alliance to 168 seats in the 577-seat parliament. 

Residents face being cut from Mullum’s water 

Dozens of Mullumbimby residents located close to the town’s local water source at Lavertys Gap Weir in Wilsons Creek are uniting against a recommendation by Byron Shire Council staff to disconnect the town’s local water supply.

Renewables/Wallum

Edward Kent’s letter, Wallum (June 26), tried to diminish the importance of the Save Wallum campaign to mere ‘piffle’,...

New music festival for Mullum

Esteemed musician and founder of the Nimbin Roots Festival, Lou Bradley, is bringing a new musical venture to the heart of Mullumbimby. The inaugural Mullum Roots Festival is scheduled to take place in July 2025, promising a vibrant celebration of music, community, and sustainability.

MungoBy Mungo MacCallum

Our attorney-general George Brandis states, as an inviolable credo, that a barrister must give fearless and impartial advice at all times.

This is a legal ideal, and perhaps one that he believes in, but the fact is that he, like all his predecessors in the office, faces an irreconcilable conflict of interest.

Certainly he is a lawyer, and a very important one: he is the first law officer of Australia. But he is also predominantly a politician; a senior government minister. And as such, he has an obligation to both prosecute and defend the decisions of the cabinet and the party room, even if – indeed, especially if – he disagrees with them.

He cannot be, and is not, impartial when it comes to matters of political controversy; the only alternative is resignation and Brandis, like almost all of his colleagues, is not going to take his guiding principle quite so far.

The contradiction inherent in his position is hardly unique; just about all of his predecessors have found themselves in similar situations. And, like Brandis, they have resolved their dilemmas by putting their politics first. Many have done so with spectacular success: three of them – Alfred Deakin, Billy Hughes and Robert Menzies – went on to become prime minister, and another three – John Latham Herbert Evatt and Billy Snedden – led their respective parties, while others, notably Garfield Barwick and Lionel Murphy, thought they should have.

Almost all attorneys-general have been prominent lawyers, but most have been, predominantly, ambitious politicians, with all the conniving, wheeling and dealing, and necessary compromise that is unavoidable in their rise up the greasy totem pole. Not all make the climb without scars; Evatt and Murphy, for instance, were severely wounded in the process before retiring hurt to the relative peace of their respective judicial benches.

And now Brandis is in the spotlight, defending both his government and his reputation over a stoush between himself and another and more eminent senior counsel, the second law officer of Australia, the solicitor-general Justin Gleeson.

Gleeson is not a politician; he is a public servant. His function is, without ambiguity, to give impartial and fearless advice to his clients, primarily to the government, but also to other members of parliament and senior public servants. He is nominally under the portfolio of his minister, but is expected to be independent.

He was very well connected in prominent legal circles and was given the job of solicitor-general in 2013 after a highly distinguished career in private practice. Until recently, there has been absolutely no controversy over his role from either side of politics.

But it has now become apparent that friction between Brandis and Gleeson has been building for some time; Gleeson believed that he was being bypassed, with Brandis seeking advice from others behind his back. And open warfare broke out with Brandis’s directive that from now on Gleeson was to ask the attorney-general for permission to advise others who sought his counsel.

Gleeson believed his independence was being undermined and threatened, and he had plenty of support: one former solicitor-general, Gavan Griffith, who served under the Hawke, Keating and Howard governments, said that the image of a dog on a lead came to mind. Gleeson also declared that Brandis had not consulted him about the proposed change. Brandis insisted that the subject was discussed, but admitted that he had not told Gleeson that he planned to issue a new directive on the eve of the last election.

It was this stand-off that led to the accusation that Brandis had deliberately misled parliament when he told the senate that there had in fact been consultation; this accusation is serious enough, normally a hanging offence. But the more important issue is the nature of the change itself.

Brandis declares that it is no more than a formality, that he would rubber stamp any requests for advice that Gleeson might be proffered. But if that is the case, why issue the directive at all? If it hadn’t been a problem, what precisely is the need to fix it?

Brandis’s opponents, and there are many of them in both political and legal circles, accused him of a naked power grab, and with some justification; he had done much the same thing as arts minister (subsequently removed by Malcolm Turnbull) when he stripped money from the independent Australia Council to fund his own choices.

And when he appeared before a senate committee on Friday, he gave no real explanation of the need for the directive that has caused the furore. Instead, he took the stand as both lawyer and politician; filibustering shamelessly to pre-empt questions, patronising and dismissing his interrogators and arrogantly demeaning Gleeson and any other critics. He knew best; they were either ignorant or mischievous.

In the end he will almost certainly get away with it: the jury is stacked, the government has the numbers. But he has hardly enhanced his reputation with the legal fraternity, and given that he – like so many previous AGs – is reportedly hoping for a job on the High Court when he is ready to retire from the undignified hurly-burly of parliament, the exercise in massaging his ego may be somewhat counter-productive.

And of course it has all been yet another unwelcome – and apparently unnecessary — distraction for a government and a prime minister with all too many such diversions. Brandis has long been seen as a bit of a loose cannon; pompous, vain and gaffe-prone, something of a liability. But he is a staunch ally of Malcolm Turnbull, who has to support him; in the present circumstances Turnbull has to support everybody. At least he has no conflict of interest; he gave up being a lawyer long ago.


Support The Echo

Keeping the community together and the community voice loud and clear is what The Echo is about. More than ever we need your help to keep this voice alive and thriving in the community.

Like all businesses we are struggling to keep food on the table of all our local and hard working journalists, artists, sales, delivery and drudges who keep the news coming out to you both in the newspaper and online. If you can spare a few dollars a week – or maybe more – we would appreciate all the support you are able to give to keep the voice of independent, local journalism alive.

3 COMMENTS

  1. “Pompous , vain and gaffe-prone ” sums him up all too well , Mungo.
    One could add a few more adjectives , but none of them suitable for publication in a family newspaper.
    Unless , of course , “incredible shit” is permissable.

  2. On a long road trip down the New England Highway last week, I was at leisure to listen to the proceedings of Brandis vs Gleeson. What a bully Brandis proved to be, backed up by the anonymous ‘hear hear’ of his mates. I felt disturbed by what I heard. That man does not represent me, in politics or politeness. It’s time to televise parliament.

  3. Brandis is so far below the level required to be appointed to the High Court it is not funny. After all, he’s never appeared in Court as a QC. There would be an outcry from the Bar Associations. I think it’s pretty obvious that Turnbull is going to pack him off to London. That will get rid of this controversy and the most despised politician in Australia.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Lavertys Gap history

The Lavertys Gap hydro power station was installed in 1919. In 1939, during the Great Depression, people had no money, and Council decided to...

Electricity lines clipped and lines come down in Lismore

Police have confirmed that a truck clipped powerlines today on Dawson Street, Lismore. 

NSW Drug Summit announced – finally

The NSW Labor government has finally delivered on their election promise to hold a NSW Drug Summit that will take place this year. 

Getting the word out on wildlife

The Young and Wild project by young women and run by Byron Youth Service (BYS) has produced wildlife stickers and murals, all to raise awareness of the plight of our native animals.