11.5 C
Byron Shire
May 15, 2021

New govt tender process could favour coal power

Latest News

Bluesfest announces October dates for 2021 festival

After two disappointing cancelations of their event, Bluesfest has announced that they will hold the 2021 festival over the...

Other News

False impressions

Fast Buck$, Coorabell I was under the impression that, upon the mayor resigning, the deputy mayor would automatically get the...

Developers push swamp boundaries – will council push back?

It has once again been left to residents to raise serious issues in relation to a development application (DA) that is pushing to overdevelop at 6 Keats Street, Byron Bay at the expense of the environment, in particular the Cumbebin Swamp.

A confusion of letters in Ocean Shores

Apparently, there is another Ocean Shores in another part of the world, and they have deer…

Tweed residents facing rate rise in 2021/2022 financial year

Tweed residents are invited to provide feedback on their council's budget, revenue policy and fees and charges, as Tweed Council prepares to finalise its delivery program and operational plan for the next financial year.

Locals call for automatic revocation of speeding fines on Hinterland Way in first half of April

When local man Nathan Hicks saw posts on Facebook about locals who had received fines they believed were incorrect he decided to look into challenging his own fine. 

Bluesfest announces October dates for 2021 festival

After two disappointing cancelations of their event, Bluesfest has announced that they will hold the 2021 festival over the...

Vales Point Power Station could benefit from a new federal government tender process. Brian Flannery is a co-owner. Photo supplied

Giles Parkinson, RenewEconomy

The Coalition government has unveiled the details of its rushed proposal to underwrite ‘new generation investments’, and it looks for all the world like a document that can be tailored to deliver whatever the government wants.

And in this case it looks increasingly like an opportunity to use taxpayers money to support the extension of an existing coal generator, most likely Vales Point in NSW.

The first thing to note is that the tender document may well be titled ‘new generation investments’ but it is open to upgrades and life extensions of existing generators, which can only mean coal and gas plants.

As well, the government has given itself license to pick and choose what it wants. And the process is deliberately framed as a ‘registration of interest’, rather than a more formal ‘expression of interest’, which would require higher levels of governance.

The various mechanisms and merit criteria are also not finalised, and can – and will – be tailored to suit whichever project takes its fancy. And the energy industry is pretty convinced what that project will likely look like: an extension to the Vales Point coal generator in NSW, possibly with a contract with the Tomago aluminium smelter.

The Coalition appears to have no more than six months left in power but is determined to leave its mark.

Apart from its clear preference for a coal project in this process, it has continued to demonise renewables, became the only country to openly support the US lobbying in favour of coal-fired power at the UN climate talks, and kept its head down when most countries expressed their horror at attempts by the US, Saudi Arabia, and Russia to have references to the recent IPCC document excluded.

Australia is also under fire over the long-running legacy of its ‘dodgy accounting’ rules that it won in the Kyoto negotiations. Those rules have allowed Australia to dramatically increase its emissions to meet the first phase of Kyoto, do little or nothing for the second phase, and they may now be carried over even further to offset its targets under Paris.

The underwriting document issued by the Coalition on Thursday (December 13) claims the process will be ‘technology neutral,’ providing a ‘level playing field to enable the best and lowest cost generation’ options to be supported.

‘All technologies allowed under Australian law will be eligible under the program, including ‘greenfield’ and ‘brownfield’ projects, such as upgrades or life extensions of existing generators,’ it says.

It notes that it could include wind and solar, firmed by contracts or co-located storage. On the face of it, that could give such projects hope, given the low prices for ‘firm’ wind and solar reported by the government’s own utility, Snowy Hydro, recently, and the observations from UK steel baron Sanjeev Gupta about what that could mean for solar plus storage projects.

The fear is, however, that it might be something like immigration policy; nominally open to all but the government will choose who it wants to enter the country.

And the Morrison government does appear to be in an awful rush. The ‘registrations of interest’ (ROI) must be submitted on January 23, a highly unusual deadline given it allows barely six weeks for replies and straddles the Christmas and New Year holidays.

The government wants to use this to develop a ‘pipeline’ of potential projects so it can then tailor the design for a more formal request for proposal that will be issued before the end of March. That process may also have a tight deadline, given that if it is keen to get the contract signed, sealed and delivered, it will need to do so before entering caretaker period before the poll likely in mid May.

Contrary to reports in mainstream media (Sydney Morning Herald), the scheme will be capped. It’s just that the caps won’t be revealed, apparently to encourage competition in the bidding. The minimum project size is 30MW.

The government has basically given itself the right to choose what it wants. Any number of mechanisms could apply, including floor price contracts, cap and floor (collar) contracts, contracts for difference, underwriting of cap contracts, loans and grants.

And it has given itself permission to apply ‘final eligibility and merit criteria’ depending on whatever mechanism it finds attractive. In other words, if it has a particular project in mind, then it can tailor the rules and requirements of each phase of the program to suit.

‘The government will refine the design of the program in the light of the information it receives through the ROI process. The eligibility and assessment criteria provided in this document are indicative only,’ it says.

‘The final eligibility and merit criteria that will be applied to proposals may differ depending on the kinds of support sought. The government reserves the right to determine the appropriate support mechanisms and the assessment criteria that will best achieve the program’s outcome and objectives for each phase of the program.’

It’s actually quite clever, but it’s also quite laughable.

Even the emissions ‘criteria’ are not fixed. The SMH made much of the fact that the merit criteria will favour investments in low emissions. But the actual document makes it clear that these criteria are options only, and may not form part of the final proposal.

The document says merits of a project ‘could be assessed’ against emissions intensity, but also that the government ‘may add to, amend or remove criteria prior to the commencement of the RFP process.’

So, if the government likes a particular project, it will be able to report a remarkable coincidence in the final merit criteria.

And why does the energy industry appear so convinced that Vales Point will be the ‘chosen’ one, an observation made from the very day the Coalition announced its underwriting plan.

Partly because Vales Point’s owner has made it clear that it wants to extend the life of its asset, and landing government support would make that task a lot easier, particularly in the face of more wind and solar generation coming on line, not to mention the anticipated proliferation of rooftop solar and household storage.

One of those owners, Trevor St Baker, dominated discussion at an open forum hosted by Taylor and his advisers in early November, and was a speaker at the Coalition’s Monash Forum that represents an attachment to coal-fired generation and a disregard to climate science.

St Baker and partner Brian Flannery have already done well out of the purchase of Vales Point, which they picked up for $1 million from the NSW government under a negotiation handled by then NSW government advisor and now Energy Security Board chair Kerry Schott.

Any such decision will be loudly opposed, and seven environmental NGOs have already moved, writing a letter warning financiers that any provision of finance for new coal or retrofits of old coal-fired power stations would be inconsistent with their public commitments to the Paris Agreement.

The letter has been sent to Westpac, CBA, NAB, ANZ, Macquarie, Suncorp, AMP and BoQ.

It refers to the recent IPCC report on climate change, the current UN climate conference, and the recent comments by Geoff Summerhayes, a board member of the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA), who warned:

‘Shifts in market sentiment have increased the risk of asset value volatility, and the potential for stranded assets. Institutions that fail to adequately plan for this transition put their own futures in jeopardy, with subsequent consequences for their account holders, members or policyholders.’

The NGOs – ACF, Get Up, Greenpeace, ACCR, The Australia Institute, AYCC and Environment Victoria – said they were seeking assurance that new coal projects and/or coal retrofits to extend the life of existing generators will not be financed by those institutions.

This article was first published in RenewEconomy and is reproduced with permission.

Support The Echo

Keeping the community together and the community voice loud and clear is what The Echo is about. More than ever we need your help to keep this voice alive and thriving in the community.

Like all businesses we are struggling to keep food on the table of all our local and hard working journalists, artists, sales, delivery and drudges who keep the news coming out to you both in the newspaper and online. If you can spare a few dollars a week – or maybe more – we would appreciate all the support you are able to give to keep the voice of independent, local journalism alive.


  1. ….& all this with a hung parliament. It might be the straw that broke the camel’s back. Pls, give us a nice Crissy present &let us go to an early poll.

    Time to remove the Men-zies Government. The other 50% should be represented too.

  2. It would help if Labour came out and said it might not honour deals done in this last desperate rush of the coal-ition government. It is obvious to everyone what is happening, so such a statement would match the general feeling in the community.

  3. PS and surely such a wishy washy request for interest document could not be upheld as legal, and certainly its not morally justifiable.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Power outage in Byron Shire

Power supply company Essential Energy says that approximately 1,780 homes and businesses were without supply this morning.

Filming of Byron Baes begins with no indigenous consultation

Filming of the Netflix series Byron Baes has reportedly commenced without any effort made by the show's production company – Eureka Productions – to consult with local indigenous groups or the local Council.

Byron Comedy Festival launched with a laugh

At a hilarious sold-out launch of the Byron Comedy Festival, Dr Karl Kruszelnicki had the entire Byron Bay Surf Club giggling last night

School Strike for Climate next Friday

Next Friday from 10am Byron Shire students will be demanding political action on the climate emergency in what they and their supporters say is our present, future and reality.