Menu

Bruns DA fiercely opposed; staff recommend approval

Paul Bibby

Byron Council staff have recommended approval of a contentious development application in Brunswick Heads, after the developer agreed to modify his plans.

The development application for a dual occupancy at 16 Short Street will come before this Thursday’s Council planning meeting.

The proposal is two large, double-storey houses, each with five bedrooms, five bathrooms and a pool.

Residents say that its size is unsuitable for both the block in question and the street more generally, that it exceeds council’s height plane rules, and will set a precedent that impacts on the entire town.

They also fear that, despite promises by the developer to the contrary, the proposal is intended to become a boarding house or defacto ‘Airbnb motel’, pointing to the large number of bedrooms and bathrooms, and electrical circuitry that would support two stoves, dishwashers and fridges in each house.

But council staff disagree with each of these arguments in their report.

They point to a range of modifications to the proposals made by the developer which have reportedly brought it up to standard.

These include, ‘Removal of external staircases to the first floor of each dwelling, increases to the side setbacks on the upper levels, removal of wet bars and cabinetry in secondary living areas, increasing the frontage setback to Dwelling 1 from 4.5m to 6.5m allowing greater private useable outdoor space, and increasing the front setback to the swimming pool from 1.0m to 1.75m in Dwelling1.’

‘The proposed development is largely consistent with the provisions of the Byron LEP 2014 and DCP 2014 other than minor variations to the building height plane controls being sought,’ staff said in the report.

‘The dual occupancy is unlikely to generate deleterious impacts on the built or natural environment and the site is considered suitable for the development.

‘The application is recommended for approval subject to conditions of consent.’

Crucially, in relation to concerns that the structures would effectively become boarding houses, council staff said the applicant has applied for a dual occupancy and not any other use and Council must assess the application based on the information as submitted.

But George Stinson, who lives next door to the proposed development, said this was a misinterpretation of the assessment process.

‘Council must assess a development based on the intended purpose of that development,’ he said.

‘If there is clear evidence, as there is in this case, that the intended purpose is for a prohibited use such as a tourist facility, then council should refuse the application.’


Support The Echo

Keeping the community together and the community voice loud and clear is what The Echo is about. More than ever we need your help to keep this voice alive and thriving in the community.

Like all businesses we are struggling to keep food on the table of all our local and hard working journalists, artists, sales, delivery and drudges who keep the news coming out to you both in the newspaper and online. If you can spare a few dollars a week – or maybe more – we would appreciate all the support you are able to give to keep the voice of independent, local journalism alive.


5 responses to “Bruns DA fiercely opposed; staff recommend approval”

  1. Rossco Phillips says:

    Let’s call a spade a spade !

    It’s a bogus hotel !

    5 Bedrooms, each with their own bathroom ???

    Blind Freddie knows what’s going on here !

  2. Good luck George, tough times indeed when relying upon common sense and common rules being applied.

    We can all see it for what it is. How can the council be so blind? And what can be done when it inevitably starts being used for short-term holiday letting contrary to the DA, LEP and council staff assertions? “oh sorry too late you were right blind freddie” our council staff will mumble

  3. Anne says:

    One site …. 10 bathrooms ? !!! Not your average granny flat !

  4. AnneCelest McCoy says:

    As Tamara Smith pointed out in her recent Echo Article, this Council needs to have a Moratorium on All D.A.s for at least 12 months. Council Planning Staff are obviously pro development. They are not the People for this Job.
    When it comes to making up excuses as to why they approve this type of inapropriate development, they have a Bag Full. It’s about time that the Rate Payers of this Shire who are being over run, reminded them just who it is that pays their Wages.

  5. Jens says:

    Wolf in a dress!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

 

Echonetdaily is made possible by the support of all of our advertisers and is brought to you by this week's sponsor, the Byron Residents' Group.