11.5 C
Byron Shire
May 24, 2024

Battle of the traffic assessments over large Byron DA

Latest News

New attractions for Mullum2Bruns Paddle

There’s new free activities to enjoy at Banner Park in Brunswick Heads after this year’s Mullum2Bruns Paddle, which will be held this Sunday, May 26, from 9.30am till 2.30pm.

Other News

Local Labor MP supports Future Gas Strategy

Climate research scientist, Joelle Gergis, has joined other scientists, academics, think tanks and economists in condemning federal Labor’s Future Gas Strategy, which was released last week.

Final kambo witnesses called, inquest yet to hear from Lore Solaris and Cameron Kite

The Jarrad Antonovich inquest ground inexorably towards its conclusion yesterday, with more evidence from witnesses showing the tragedy could possibly have been avoided, and certainly the ongoing damage lessened, if everyone involved had taken responsibility earlier.

New Murwillumbah pump station build underway

There is no denying that Murwillumbah floods and locals are hoping that the construction of a new stormwater pump...

Posters gone

I am writing to bring attention to a growing issue in our community – the removal of community posters....

NSW gov’t opens Tweed Valley Hospital

The NSW government is to officially open the $723.3 million Tweed Valley Hospital today after the transferral of patients to the new facility last week.

Shambolic roads

With regards to the Echo article, ‘Let’s dive deep into potholes’ (May 15), I am appalled at the attitude...

Developer Graham Dunn. Photo supplied.

Residents are keeping up the pressure over developer Graham Dunn’s plans to use a narrow residential laneway as the entry/exit point for the traffic exiting from his massive multi-level mixed use proposal, located on the corner block opposite Mitre 10 and Byron Music. 

The Browning Street Residents Group (BSRG) have paid for their own independent traffic assessment, which is at odds with the traffic assessment submitted within Dunn’s DA.

Submissions closed for DA 10.2019.616.1 on February 7, and it is now expected to be before Council sometime in May. The Echo understands the Northern Regional Planning Panel (NRPP) is not the authority, as it’s under the $30m threshold cap, at around $22m.

In 2018, Dunn’s first DA was rejected by the Northern Regional Planning Panel (NRPP), while Council planning staff inexplicably supported its approval.

Unlike the previous DA, the new DA offers ‘permanent residential accommodation with no short-term accommodation at all’ and Dunn claims to have made significant improvements to the DA, and engaged in extensive neighbour consultation.

But the DA exceeds height limits and breaches other policies.

The traffic report commissioned by affected residents says, ‘The potential for vehicles to attempt access [to] the site via the Tennyson Street connection to Ruskin Lane has not been assessed’.

‘These movements will cause unacceptable conflicts of two way traffic on a single carriageway’.

The original traffic report within the DA claims that, if approved, there would be just under 1,000 traffic movements in the laneway each day, based on the movements of residents and commercial customers.

But the residents’ traffic report says that this daily flow is in breach of the federal government’s AMCORD guidelines, as the environmental capacity of Ruskin Lane will be exceeded by 66 per cent in the morning peak hour (AM) and 20 per cent in the evening peak hour.

Yet Dunn says that is ‘incorrect’. He told The Echo, ‘The access to 139 Jonson Street is an augmentation of Browning Street, and the majority of vehicles will not be travelling along Ruskin Lane’.

The residents’ report continues, ‘These excess traffic flows will have a direct impact on all residents using Ruskin Lane, as they seek to enter or leave via the Browning Street section of Ruskin Lane.’

Their report claims the traffic assessment submitted within Dunn’s DA does not address conflicts between pedestrian/cycle movements on the Browning Street footpath and Jonson Street traffic to and from the proposed development. 

While the new report claims, ‘The arguments used to dismiss the alternative access off Jonson Street are not adequately supported,’ Dunn previously stated that, ‘We are required by Byron Shire Council’s Development Control Plan (DCP) to have rear lane access’.

‘This is a safer pedestrian option as concluded in the PlanIt report. Page 18 of the Byron Shire DCP 2014 for Commercial and Retail Development states that car parking access is preferably to come from rear lanes’.

Yet the BSRG says, ‘The DCP uses the discretionary word ‘preferred’ so it is not a mandatory provision.

‘As such, Council is required to weigh up specific proposals in the public interest’. They say in the context of laneways close to the town centre with commercial activity on both sides, ‘the provision cannot be taken to justify imposing heavy commercial traffic onto a residential access’.

Dunn told The Echo, ‘Greg Alderson and Associates undertook a traffic survey over a week, using a classified vehicle counter. Traffic counters were placed along Jonson and Browning Streets and Ruskin Lane to capture daily traffic and peak hour traffic surrounding the site. An additional 30 minute traffic survey was undertaken to confirm this traffic data and turning movements’.

Dunn’s proposal can be viewed at www.139jonson.com.au, while info from the Browning Street Residents Group can be found at their Hands Off Ruskin Lane Facebook page.


Support The Echo

Keeping the community together and the community voice loud and clear is what The Echo is about. More than ever we need your help to keep this voice alive and thriving in the community.

Like all businesses we are struggling to keep food on the table of all our local and hard working journalists, artists, sales, delivery and drudges who keep the news coming out to you both in the newspaper and online. If you can spare a few dollars a week – or maybe more – we would appreciate all the support you are able to give to keep the voice of independent, local journalism alive.

2 COMMENTS

  1. Its worth noting, that even with the neighborhood impacts adressed, that this pro development Mayor and council has extended the 3 storey limit to this previously 2 storey limit end of Jonson St, thus any eventual increased 3 storey development will increase all impacts both on the neighbors and on general CBD traffic. Previously the CBD planning was for 3 storeys in the central CBD, reduced to 2 storeys on the CBD edge. Councils new height increase will now facilitate a 3 storey gateway to the town centre. Benefiting who?

  2. When I was on Council I regularly saw developers cribbing a bit on development standards & the staff waving the proposal through. Quite a few times I remarked that it would be nice if the Police would do the same with those breaking the speed limit, or being just a few weeks out of rego.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Five hours spent at last Thursday’s Byron Council

If you need a fix of local government decision-making, you could dip into the odd five-hour online recording of what occurred at last Thursday’s Council meeting.

Editorial – Optics vs reform

One of the more hyped elements of last week’s federal budget was a $300 handout to every homeowner to alleviate the increase in energy costs.

Final kambo witnesses called, inquest yet to hear from Lore Solaris and Cameron Kite

The Jarrad Antonovich inquest ground inexorably towards its conclusion yesterday, with more evidence from witnesses showing the tragedy could possibly have been avoided, and certainly the ongoing damage lessened, if everyone involved had taken responsibility earlier.

A long story

I see that Israel supporters take exception to the expression ‘from the river to the sea’ as meaning that all Jews should be wiped...