10.8 C
Byron Shire
July 28, 2021

Will secondary dwellings remove agriculture from Tweed?

Latest News

Entertainment in the Byron Shire and beyond for the week beginning July 28, 2021

It's amazing what you can still go and see and do. Check it out!

Other News

Zero

Andrew Macklin, Mullumbimby Creek Gareth Smith (July 14), I can see you like the selective use of historical facts and statistics...

Editorial – Free fi fo dumb?

Hans Lovejoy, editor Scientists have warned that now the UK has come out of lockdown on ‘freedom day’ (July 19),...

The new Wollumbin stamp that doesn’t feature Wollumbin…

When Australia Post’s new volcano series was proudly unveiled last week it included an image labelled ‘Wollumbin Mt Warning NSW’.

Byron council recognises impacts of STP on local landholders

Following a refusal by Byron Shire Council to communicate with local landholders on the Belongil Catchment Drain Board over the impact of excess water flows from the Sewage Treatment Plant they have finally admitted there is a major problem.

Local government elections postponed – again

NSW local government elections are postponed again due to the pandemic.

Bumbling Berejiklian

Keith Duncan, Pimlico The chooks have certainly come home to roost for the corruption riddled NSW government and ‘our’ scandal plagued...

The impact of secondary dwellings on rural lots smaller than ten hectares in Tweed Shire will be discussed at this afternoons Tweed Shire Council meeting. Image Google maps.

The impact of secondary dwellings on rural lots smaller than ten hectares in Tweed Shire will be discussed at this afternoons Tweed Shire Council meeting.

The Rural Housing Proposal has been put forward by conservative Crs Warren Polglase and Pryce Allsop who said that it is away to assist ‘rural land owners to financially enable their properties’.

However, Tweed Mayor Chris Cherry says that the current Rural Land Strategy approach is a good compromise between facilitating farmers use of their land and avoiding rural land conflicts.

‘Under the rural land strategy farmers can get a secondary dwelling approved for a property greater than 10 hectares. It also contains an action that makes tourist cabins easier.

Focus on the future

‘I thought we had addressed it by allowing the larger lots to do it while trying to reduce the land use conflicts for people living there who are impacted by often loud, dusty farming activities. If you are buying into rural lands you need to understand how loud cows are, how early chooks rise, or the impacts of living next to farming where there might be cane burning or spray drift.’

Cr Ron Cooper was clear that the land use conflict was already impacting rural areas.

‘We’ve already had issues with farming noise, greenhouses and fans being too close to housing that is on a neighbouring lot. They can already put housing housing on farms for holiday use for example with farm stays. I am not even happy that we have farm stays. What can happen is they make a living out of farm stays and then they want to stop people farming next door because of the impacts [cane burning and spray drift].

While Cr Allsop recognised that farms can already set up as farm stays and have a secondary dwelling that is attached to the primary dwelling he said that a separate secondary dwelling will ‘enable a better lifestyle for tenants and property owners’.

Cr Allsop explained that the drive behind facilitating secondary dwellings on small farms related to broadening the opportunities for farmers because with ‘small farms you get small income – in a lot of cases’.

‘We want to enable the farmers to have a bit of a backbone. Enable the farm to have families, start up tourist facilities. We know what has been happening hasn’t been working for them.’

Some councillors have raised the issue of land conflict between farmers and other land use practices. Image Google maps.

Rate increase for Tweed landowners

‘The Polglase Rural Housing Proposal means a 10 per cent rate increase for the wider community,’ said former Mayor Katie Milne.

‘Staff have advised that Cr Polglase’s proposal would ultimately allow for 4,691 new rural dwellings at a cost of $11.5M in lost rates that would have to be subsidised by the rest of the community to the tune of a 10 per cent rate increase.’

Both Crs Allsop and Polglase recognised that the proposed increase in dwellings does not increase the rate base for the Tweed Shire Council.

When addressing Echonetdaily‘s second question on the issue of increased traffic impacts on farmers and landholders that allowing more houses may have Cr Polglase terminated the phone call.

However, Cr Allsop recognised that, ‘Yes, there were going to be some issues going forward’ but that he felt these could be worked out.

Carving up land

‘This proposal would also cause massive upheaval for our farming community as the impact of residential dwellings are a major cause of conflict for farming operations,’ Ms Milne said.

‘Tweed Shire has already suffered from a major carve up rural land prior to 1987 which has resulted in 50 per cent of lots being less than three hectares, nearly 60 per cent less than five hectares, and 73 per cent less than 15 hectares.’

Councillor Cooper highlighted the fact that the future is uncertain and that the shire cannot afford to lose more farming potential.

‘There will be more types of farming in the future like hydroponics and we will need these areas for farming,’ he told Echonetdaily.

Mayor Cherry agreed saying that, ‘If COVID has taught us anything it is that local food production is really important. Older farmers could lease their land to younger farmers who want to actually produce local food. There is a huge a huge demand in our community for it.

‘I think these proposals are a very short sighted view and are not focussed on agriculture use of land. Once you build houses on useful agricultural land it is gone. We need to protect it – especially in an area that we have proper rain fall.’

Best interest of the community?

‘Whilst I have sympathy for the rural land holders who would like a second dwelling the cost to the rest of the community, including the pensioners in town who are already struggling to pay their rates is too great, and the future of farming in Tweed would be in real jeopardy,’ said Cr Milne.

‘There are of course also serious implications for the scenic amenity and tourism integrity of our rural landscape, the health of our waterways with twice as much sewerage load, impacts to our wildlife in doubling the rural population, as well as the extra strain this will put on the road network and all other services.

‘We must put the greater good of the Tweed Shire ahead of the personal benefit for individual landholders.’

Mayor Cherry also emphasised the importance of putting the long term interests of the community before short term gains saying that, ‘I do feel like there is some quite extensive lobbying going on from people who personally are looking to have financial gain out of this. We have to be very carefully as councillors that we are not being lobbied and making decision in relation to private financial gain.’

The Tweed Shire Council meeting will be available to watch via their website from 4pm today.


Support The Echo

Keeping the community together and the community voice loud and clear is what The Echo is about. More than ever we need your help to keep this voice alive and thriving in the community.

Like all businesses we are struggling to keep food on the table of all our local and hard working journalists, artists, sales, delivery and drudges who keep the news coming out to you both in the newspaper and online. If you can spare a few dollars a week – or maybe more – we would appreciate all the support you are able to give to keep the voice of independent, local journalism alive.

6 COMMENTS

  1. City people move up to rural areas and then complain about noise from agricultural equipment, farmyard smells and farm animals. Oh duh.what do they expect? City noises of non-stop traffic 24/7?

  2. I am confused.
    I have long since given up on expecting rational policies from councils, but why housing should be tied to
    “secondary dwellings on rural lots smaller than ten heaters” is puzzling. I am aware that the issue of heaters has become something of a political HOT potato with wood-burners effects on smog production. The electrical models serve to subsidize horrendous air pollution from coal-fired power stations and dubious criminal elements from India, the life-blood of Liberal/national coffers.
    So it does start to seem reasonable to rein in these smaller heater utilisers “by allowing the larger lots to do it”, those that can reasonably afford the cost of heaters and contribute to council by paying less rates.
    No , I’m still confused. G”)

  3. Council should be looking at rural properties that are non viable or agriculturally unusable these properties could then be zoned for a second dwelling or small second dwelling allotment. I would guess without a bit of research 40 percent or more of rural properties would fall into this category.

  4. Firstly, thanks to Crs Polglase and Allsop for their genuine concern for the rural sector. The issues are clear – rural landholders are under increasing stress which is unnecessarily caused by prejudicial councillors with the support of some council staff. Rural landholders want to use 1% or less of THEIR land for a second dwelling to develop their agricultural land or to support extended families, or for rental income, farm labour support or to help aging owners to stay in their long term rural homes – at least 4 Councillors say NO! No help to rural economic sustainability or social wellbeing or to job creation, no help to local builders, job seekers, the homeless or split families or the aged in need of home care. Instead of finding solutions to their fundamental and true issue of concern – i.e. land-use conflict – landholders and the public are presented with biased, uncompromising policies loaded with obfuscation and misinformation. The fundamental problem is the untenable and inexplicable inability/unwillingness of Councillors and staff to resolve that critical issue of land use conflict. It seems the only way to fix that problem is to change Councillors and that may be best achieved by splitting the Shire into 2 wards – one rural and one coastal with appropriate balanced Councillor representation for each ward. For further information contact [email protected]

  5. Research Rules of structure on a property If the Structure is 100 m from any Boundry you don’t require any approval. Unless COUNCILS. (A DEPT of State government) have removed that right

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Navigating through laws around business lockdowns

A flyer circulating within the community is making claims against the government's COVID-19 powers, and provides supporting legislation, claiming the information provided is to...

Highest Hapki yusul award given to former Rosebank resident

Ross Kendall Jarrod Taylor has received the Ninth Dan – the highest award in Hapki yusul, the martial art from which Hapkido is derived, from...

Opportunities aplenty for young rugby standout

Ross Kendall Mullumbimby 16-year-old, Raife McKenzie, is a rising star rugby player who has had a big year after winning the country championship, being selected...

Interview with Felix Riebl from the Cat Empire

One of the most danceable outfits in the lineup, The Cat Empire make a welcome return to Bluesfest 2021 with their infectious, genre-embracing anthems and a world-class, awe-inspiring show. Last week Seven caught up with co-founder, band leader and principal songwriter, Felix Riebl, from his lockdown hidey hole in Melbourne.