13.2 C
Byron Shire
July 6, 2022

Comment: Bridging the flooded divide

Latest News

Developer fees and charges cut

Council fees for construction and development in Byron were the equivalent of paying $160 for a coffee, making it ‘entirely unviable’ to invest here, industry representatives told the Council last week.

Other News

Attempt to manage Byron’s fragile coastline impeded by State Government, report finds

Insufficient funding and guidance from the State Government is inhibiting Byron Council's attempt to effectively manage its famous but fragile coastline, a Council report has revealed.

Police seeking public assistance following Byron Bay assault

A serious assault in Byron Bay on Friday, 3 June, 2022 has led to police releasing further CCTV footage and another appeal for information from the public. 

Crabbes Creek Woodfired

By V. Cosford There’s a contingent of Europeans who don’t mind travelling a considerable distance in order to stock up...

Mandy Nolan’s Soapbox: To Hall and Back

There is something magical about a country hall. These small wooden buildings dot the landscape. They have a frugal modesty and an old fashioned generosity. If they had names they’d be called Thelma or Rose or Alan. They’re a pungent olfactory mix of last week’s wedding enmeshed with yesterday’s committee meeting. Curry and Jatz, tea and beer, tears and laughter.

Australia Anti-Nuclear Delegation

We are delighted to share the news that Australia will attend the first Meeting of State Parties to the...

Locals take points in first all-female surf event

Ross Kendall The Le-Ba Ladybirds won the final event of the inaugural, and Australian first, All Women’s Surf Series held...

Now that the pesky election is over, it is time to return to the most important issue of our time.

The flood. (Of course, I actually mean a climate change induced catastrophic weather event).

There are two classes of people in so many aspects of life – those who inherit and those don’t, those who think and those who voted for Clive Palmer, and those who like doof and those who still listen to the Eagles.

The Echo presents recently retired magistrate David Heilpern as one of the monthly columnists who will replace the irreplaceable Mungo MacCallum. David is the author of several law-related books, journal articles and reported judgments. He was the youngest magistrate in Australia, when appointed in 1998.

But in the sodden floodplains the divide among those affected has never been clearer – those who were insured, and those who weren’t, renters and owners, Lismore LGA and everywhere else.

The trauma for the insured is eased by the promise of repairs (eventually), months of accommodation (somewhere) but tainted by the fear of the size of the premium next year. The trauma of the uninsured is exacerbated by the prospect of living in a plasterless wasteland with tangled extension cords and no dunny walls because they couldn’t afford the absurd premiums to protect their biggest asset in the whole wide world.

It does not have to be like this.

My first column for The Echo was about the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Scheme – an insurance safeguard scheme for the risk of adverse reactions – proving the USA does still have remnants of good ideas just sometimes. Well, guess which country also has had a government flood insurance scheme so that all households can be covered for flood for under $1,000 per year? There is no prize for answering – the land of the free and guns and Trump.

Since 1968, an (albeit imperfect) scheme called the National Flood Insurance Program permits whole regions to opt-in, in exchange for commitments not to build any further in flood zones.

Insurance becomes a compulsory addition to all loans in flood affected areas. Mostly the scheme has been self-funding, and after some disasters (Katrina/Sandy) the government had to bail it out.

Australia has its own absurd mini version, but only for flood and cyclones in Northern Queensland.

The Australian Government has committed $10B to support private insurers lower their premiums. Classic neo-liberal profit-based non-solution that makes insurance companies salivate, and makes the USA system appear positively communist. But we have to look after our redneck rump.

Usually, mutual insurance suggestions like this get howled down by those who argue that this would just lead to more building in the floodplains and the whole scheme would thus collapse under the weight of increasing claims by swamp dwellers. Think West Byron. But the USA scheme effectively addresses this. Win/win, I reckon.

And the truth is that there are no other viable alternatives that I have seen. I’d imagine repairing in ‘flood-proofish’ materials could be incorporated as a condition of insurance.

And some house raising and buybacks where possible.

But imagine if every house could be insured for flood for $20 per week and it was compulsory if there was any sort of mortgage. The economy of scale might just mean that the burden of flood is shared amongst many, not a lottery lucky few. For those who say it may lose money – well that’s maybe right. But think of the total the governments are paying now by way of grants and loans and subsidies.

My heart bleeds for those looking for rental accommodation post-flood.

The squeeze is a real crisis, nation-wide, but nowhere as keen as here. There are dozens of applicants for every house, and the prices seem to be based on over $300 per bedroom.

Pretty shit if you are a family. Profiteering is rife and my friend, sole parent and Lismore poet, Rebecca Rushbrook, wrote so beautifully on this recently in her poem When You Raise the Rent.

‘When you raise the rent,

the extra dollars you have to spend

leave me holding my breath in the supermarket.

Leave me gluing together broken shoes for the third time.

Leave me keeping the heater packed away on the coldest day of winter’.

Again, it does not need to be this way. A free market can and should be regulated in emergencies. After all, there was a partial ban on evictions during COVID. There should be an immediate moratorium on rent rises from pre-flood unless the landlord can show the Tribunal that there are exceptional circumstances. I have heard landlords say “that is bullshit, we will just sell then”. Well, good. Maybe there will be a few more houses on the market.

Finally, there is the great geographic divide. No-one doubts that more houses went under in Lismore than anywhere else. But that should not be a determinative factor in the grant of aid or mitigation works.

A ruined house is a ruined house even if it is on its own in Burringbar, or destroyed by mud in Huonbrook.

There may be dirt moving works needed in South Golden Beach as well as North Lismore. It feels like so many folk are being forgotten in Murwillumbah and Ocean Shores and Coraki when the focus remains so one-town centric.

I love Lismore, we lived in South, right on the river when our children were primary age in a house that could never go under. Until it did this time. The river was our pool. But surely, the only rational basis for distribution of aid is need, and bang for buck not LGA.

The divides of insurance, ownership and location are usurped, naturally, by our unity and goodwill. Mostly, the insured help the uninsured, landlords are decent to their tenants, and Lismorons are just as loud about a fair spread of aid.

And as I write it is still raining here. Our bore, until now always 80ft down has been bubbling near to the surface for three months. To walk to the avocado tree requires flippers to stop sinking. My eyes are mouldy.

Is there an opposite to a rain dance?


Support The Echo

Keeping the community together and the community voice loud and clear is what The Echo is about. More than ever we need your help to keep this voice alive and thriving in the community.

Like all businesses we are struggling to keep food on the table of all our local and hard working journalists, artists, sales, delivery and drudges who keep the news coming out to you both in the newspaper and online. If you can spare a few dollars a week – or maybe more – we would appreciate all the support you are able to give to keep the voice of independent, local journalism alive.

13 COMMENTS

  1. Thanks for your thoughts, David.
    We CAN do better.
    Hopefully, we WILL do better with a more compassionate government.

  2. Insurance, just think of insurance for a moment as the Council trucks plied the garbage-stricken streets picking up tonnes and tonnes of soaked water-logged rubbish to be dumped out at the tip. Just how many tonnes was it? It was many hundreds of tonnes of rubbish and all that rubbish was once House contents and those contents has to be replaced.
    That means there will be a cost to be added now to House Insurance and Contents applications when you go and re-new your Home and Contents Insurance.
    In the mail today I have just received my car insurance renewal and guess what? The car insurance premium has gone up. It has been increased. My car is a 12-year-old modern Japanese car and the car insurance has increased. Am I now to pay for all those people who drove through flood waters on the Northern Rivers when I am a careful driver and do not drive in flood waters?
    Go to you friendly Insurance company and what is probably the first question they will ask you as they look you up and down on the computer.
    They will ask “What is your post code”? Yes, the Northern Rivers area can be identified by post code and you might live 30 kilometres from a river. The Cost of Living is rising and other people losing their cars in floods and their home contents will raise your cost of living just because you live in the area renowned for floods, the Northern Rivers.

    • That’s how collectivism works. Collective punishment. The Judge says the only way to solve it is even more collectivism. Doing the same thing and expecting different results. Sounds like insanity.

      • Looking forward to your first attempt to write for the Echo. Perhaps avoid topics requiring empathy. 800 words is different from the comments section. Requires thought

        • I can sympathise with some one without shielding them from the consequences of their own actions. They have been told, they do not listen, they get hurt, they learn. If you fix everything that goes wrong, you create helpless people that are dependent on you for life. On a national level, you end up with a majority of useless being held up by a minority of capable. Save your empathy for those who can’t know better, like toddlers or the insane. I’m all for having a voluntary security net for genuine unforeseeable misfortune, but not for the willfully ignorant.

  3. We could have flood insurance for $20 a week if houses cost on average $3000.

    Unfortunately they actually cost more like $300,000.

    That’s why flood insurance needs to cost $2,000 a week for a $300,000 house.

    So innocent people don’t have to pay to allow other idiots to refuse to get out of the floodplain, like Emily is pointing out.

    The divide is between the people who want to be bailed out of flood damage (often due to their own stupid and defiant choice), and those they expect to pay bigger premiums to facilitate this

  4. It comes down to those who make good decisions verse those who don’t. Those who are detached from reality will find they have a rougher time of it.

  5. Christian and Shane I appreciate your views, but I could not disagree more. Good decisions? People lost houses to landslide who did not make bad decisions. Shane, so people who live in flood plains are guilty of stupidity and defiance? I reckon neither of you appreciate how an insurance systems like this would work. Think Green Slips which pay for all motor vehicle injuries. Sure, those who drive stupidly and are injured are covered – but that is what criminal laws and regulations are for. If you are injured, you should be looked after by a collective mutual form of assistance. Insurance. We all paid a levy on our home insurance for fire. The same principal would work for flood. $2000 per week Shane??? That means no insurance at all and on any calculations I have seen, that number is well beyond the pale. Lucky we live in a community where such attitudes are scarce.

  6. The above comments are a stark reminder never to leave a comment on an excellent Echo article. What planet do people like “Christian” (is that a joke?) come from?

  7. I don’t believe victim blaming helps anyone. We are all responsible for the living and built environment, including the shortage and cost of housing. There is one word that sums it all up …..”Greed!”

  8. Too true, David. Victim blaming, Paul, is ‘trickery’. Insurance Comp know & play
    along with a game that’s not for the faint hearted – life itself – trust & love . Many
    of today’s ‘smarts’ believe they have all the answers. It aint so. Goon-shows are
    not common sense just like kicking people & a situation when it’s down. Grow up.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Mandy Nolan’s Soapbox: To Hall and Back

There is something magical about a country hall. These small wooden buildings dot the landscape. They have a frugal modesty and an old fashioned generosity. If they had names they’d be called Thelma or Rose or Alan. They’re a pungent olfactory mix of last week’s wedding enmeshed with yesterday’s committee meeting. Curry and Jatz, tea and beer, tears and laughter.

NSW Farmers: post-flood job losses are devastating

People need jobs if an area is to survive and many businesses have been crippled when successive major floods devastated the region earlier this year.

Taqueria in Byron celebrates four years

Chupacabra Mexican restaurant in Suffolk Park is turning four this week! Through the ups and downs of the past few years this little taqueria...

Celebrating 40 years of Fig Tree Restaurant

It all started with a simple dream, to convert its original farmhouse in Ewingsdale into a restaurant in which its guests could gather to...