27.6 C
Byron Shire
February 5, 2023

RAT effectiveness: does it wane with each new COVID-19 variant?

Latest News

Natural history

While I have not the informed authority to confirm John Bradley’s musings on the birds that seem to be...

Other News

Calls to extend temporary accommodation for flood insured

The one-year limit on temporary accommodation provided by some insurance companies to people whose homes went under in the flood must be extended.

Only nine weeks to Bluesfest and 18 new artists announced

Easter is on its way and that means Bluesfest is only nine weeks away. 

Environment law fails to protect threatened species

A University of Queensland finding says that the federal environmental laws are failing to mitigate against Australia’s extinction crisis.

Saint Bob of the Greens in Lennox Head

With hardly a vacant seat in the auditorium, Bob Brown kept the party faithful’s eyes, ears and hearts glued...

Community advocacy

I am a small business owner of Byron Central Apartments. Tamara Smith MP has recently supported us on two...

Iconic Mondays

The iconic Reggae Monday is coming back to the Beach Hotel after a long break, and just in time...

Rapid Antigen Test.

Brought to you by Cosmos Magazine and The Echo

Regulator review underway, but rapid antigen testing is probably as good as ever.

Rapid Antigen Tests – or RATs – are probably as effective as they’ve ever been, even when it comes to new COVID-19 variants.

That’s because these tests seek out parts of the virus that aren’t inclined to change.

While the spike protein on the SARS-CoV-2 virus is the site of most immunity-evading mutations, RATs instead search for the nucleocapsid proteins below the virus surface.

The nucleocapsid – or N protein – is where the virus’s genetic material is contained.

A chemical reaction between this protein and the solution used to perform the test is what generates a positive marker on the RAT cassette.

Rapid antigen testing provides a quicker testing option to the more accurate polymerase chain reaction (PCR) tests that are conducted in labs, but the sacrifice is precision.

During the early stages of the Omicron outbreak, Cochrane, a global health not-for-profit based in the UK, found antigen testing accurately correctly identified an average of 73% of symptomatic positive cases, and just 55% of asymptomatic cases.

Right now, the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) is reviewing the performance of all “COVID-19-specific” tests. That includes lab-based PCR testing and all rapid antigen tests.

The review is being undertaken “as quickly as possible” in conjunction with the Doherty Institute and national Serology Reference Laboratory. In its announcement, the TGA noted that “[Test] manufacturers are required to undertake proactive monitoring to ensure their tests are not impacted by the variants of the virus.”

More on RAT effectiveness: How do Rapid Antigen Tests work, and are we using them wrong

Professor Deborah Williamson is a clinical biologist at the Doherty Institute, which is helping run the evaluations for the TGA.

So far, only one RAT – a CovClear product – has failed to meet the TGA’s minimum standard, and only when identifying wild type and Delta strains (it passed the Omicron identification threshold). Over 70 product evaluations are yet to be reported.

Williamson explains that even though these evaluations are highly systematic and specialised, they are lab-based. What they can’t account for is the biology of the person undertaking the test, which also influences how a person sheds a virus.

Prior vaccination can also alter viral shedding patterns.

“The nucleocapsid protein is under less selection pressure than the spike protein, so we see far fewer mutations [there], and certainly all the work we’ve done to date hasn’t shown any difference between variants in a laboratory setting and this is an important point for the [RAT] kits,” Williamson says.

“Having said that, each of the variants may have different kinetics in different people, they may shed differently.

“It’s not as simple as saying that the kits may or may not work, there are so many other factors that come into play.”

That partly explains why viral testing can lack precision: even highly accurate PCR falls short of a 100% strike rate for virus detection.

Paul Griffin, an associate professor in medicine at Queensland University and the director of infectious diseases at Mater Research, says a person experiencing any symptoms should see them as an important marker of illness.

Given that rapid antigen testing can “miss” infection, Griffin says a person with COVID-like symptoms who tests negative on a RAT should follow up either with another test, or a trip to a testing clinic to undergo a PCR.

“People need to understand they [RATs] come with some limitations, as does any test to be honest. They’re not necessarily infallible,” Griffin says.

“We need people to understand that COVID is going to remain a risk in our population, so we do need to look for it.”



This article was originally published on Cosmos Magazine and was written by Matthew Agius. Matthew Agius is a science writer for Cosmos Magazine.

Published by The Echo in conjunction with Cosmos Magazine.


Support The Echo

Keeping the community together and the community voice loud and clear is what The Echo is about. More than ever we need your help to keep this voice alive and thriving in the community.

Like all businesses we are struggling to keep food on the table of all our local and hard working journalists, artists, sales, delivery and drudges who keep the news coming out to you both in the newspaper and online. If you can spare a few dollars a week – or maybe more – we would appreciate all the support you are able to give to keep the voice of independent, local journalism alive.

1 COMMENT

  1. “We need people to understand that COVID is going to remain a risk in our population, so we do need to look for it.”
    We wouldn’t need to do so much ‘looking’ if we all kept taking Covid seriously like still wearing the mask in closed spaces – masks are still to be worn when visiting aged care settings,medical and hospital settings.

    Each week scores of Aussies are still dying from the Covid but no one in authority seems to take Covid seriously anymore.
    It’s all been dumbed down to “living with Covid”, so move on nothing to see here anymore.
    “Living with Covid”; tell that to the survivors of their loved ones that are Covid deceased; tell that to Looooooong Covid sufferers; tell that to our continuing over stretched health system workers and hospitals.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Community advocacy

I am a small business owner of Byron Central Apartments. Tamara Smith MP has recently supported us on two separate occasions advocating effectively with...

Swivel by name, drivel by nature

The lack of authenticity of Byron Councillor, Mark Swivel, does not come as a surprise from this side of the fence. A well-to-do lawyer...

Land values rise

Your cover story on 25 January claims that land valuation rises could herald increases in Council rates. This is potentially misleading. A council’s total...

Go Thistles!

Lismore Thistles Soccer Club has launched the Thistles Acceleration Program, in the process becoming the city’s only player development academy.