12.6 C
Byron Shire
August 12, 2022

At a gathering of trainspotters

Latest News

Nimblefoot launches tonight in Byron 

Acclaimed Bangalow author Robert Drewe, who will be featuring at Byron Writers Festival, is having his latest book Nimblefoot launched by Kerry O’Brien at The Book Room at Byron at 6pm tonight. 

Other News

Backlash

Last week’s Backlash asked why the disused rail corridor couldn’t be utilised to prevent another ‘shemozzle’ at Splendour, suggesting...

Flat Earth Byron councillors

In face of the facts, an approval of the development application (DA) for a basement car park in Brunswick...

Revenge

The Fischer–Spassky 1992 Twentieth Anniversary Rematch was in fact Russia and Spassky’s revenge. Russia knew that Bobby Fischer was unstable,...

Mullum locals protest flood-prone pod site

Around 40–50 locals gathered outside the Byron Shire Council chambers this morning to highlight the risks of, and lack of due process around, the selection of the flood accommodation pod site in Mullumbimby.

OS Community Garden launches food stall

Members of the Shara Community Gardens gathered on July 31 to launch their new food exchange stall on Shara...

Comment: Time for another Police Royal Commission? 

It might be time for another investigation into the NSW Police Force, but this time, the police conduct under the microscope would be alleged overreach in the application of certain powers.

One of the tunnels on the old train line in Byron Shire. Photo David Lisle.

David Lisle

On a cold wet Wednesday evening in March, a small band of committed train activists gathered at the Mullumbimby Ex-Services Club. It was billed as a major event: a public meeting to launch a new company, Northern Rivers Rail Limited (NRRLtd), and to share its grand plans of bringing trains back to our tracks. Thirty people attended.

Having never previously attended a gathering of trainspotters I was excited. And slightly anxious – my recent commentary in these pages on the rail corridor debate expressed great skepticism about the prospect of trains returning to our tracks.

Combined forces

NRRLtd combines the lobbying might of TOOT and NRRAG (trains on our tracks and Northern Rivers railway action group respectively). Its formal objective is to promote a ‘heritage railway’. By mobilising people power they hope to crowdfund a railway.

NRRLtd should not be confused with a similarly named advocacy group, the Northern Rivers Rail-Trail, formed in 2013 with the aim of preserving the rail corridor by creating a community cycle and walking track.

Historically, TOOT and NRRAG have been vociferous opponents of the proposed rail-trail. A sudden, recent shift however, now sees them embracing the rail-trail, so long as it runs beside the tracks. The train lobby seems to be fighting a rearguard action. It has lost the ear of councils at both ends of the corridor where the rail-trail is currently under construction, but is energised by the impending track removal.

Rails demise

The meeting began with Beth Shelley setting out the rail-lobby’s theory of politics in which the train’s demise can be blamed on the road lobby and our faltering democracy.

A short, stirring, film followed, and then councillor Basil Cameron took the floor and spoke at length about his grand vision for trains on our tracks.

His main points were as follows: We no longer have a train service because of ‘scandalous political games’ and ‘scandalous studies’; We commissioned a study ‘from our perspective’ which proved we need trains. Not actual trains, something more like Toyota Coasters with steel guide-wheels; People have been saying for years the train is never ever coming back but the Elements solar train proves them wrong, ‘what a great innovation’; Byron’s public transport situation is ‘atrocious’; We have ‘extreme gridlock’ and 2.4 million tourists; Transport for NSW (TfNSW) might spend $78 million in the future on the Ewingsdale interchange and a working party is meeting regularly with Council, ‘listening to us like they’ve never listened before’.

Like you probably are now, I was confused about where this was going. But things came into focus when we were shown a video of Simon Richardson (unable to attend in person). Unlike Basil, who is world weary and downbeat, Simon radiates enthusiasm, speaking in ‘vision terms’, his hands busy.

The rail narrative

I soon realised a beguiling scheme had been hatched, and a narrative crafted for our consumption. The idea is to convince TfNSW to spend the $78 million on the Toyota Coaster project instead of the highway interchange.

Simon says if we ‘hold our tongues and talk more about tourism than transport, they will fund it’. The result will be branded ‘public transport’. A bike path can run beside the rails, and everyone will be happy.

Apparently, ‘reactivating the corridor’ will divert so much traffic from Ewingsdale Road that the interchange upgrade will not be required, and the savings can be spent on Toyota Coasters.

According to Basil ‘the railway is actually the spine of an integrated transport network’. He explained how bus routes will radiate off the rail corridor, conveying pas-sengers swiftly into the hills and beyond!

After hearing more about the new rail company, we heard from ‘Tom’, an engineer from Crabbes Creek. He praised the efficiency of trains and spruiked his plan for Tweed Council to build their (fully funded and already under construction) rail-trail off-formation so the trains can run again.

Next, ‘Bill’, an angry protester from the Tweed addressed the gathering, declaring politicians bad and trains good. He said the motor-rail used to hit 150kmph, and threatened civil disobedience if the tracks are ripped up. He reckons they want to profit from the scrap: ‘probably a million dollars’.

Raised cycleways

Lack of public consultation was a central concern throughout the meeting, as was the popularity of the old motor-rail, and the idea that privately operated buses aren’t really public transport. Some attendees seemed preoccupied with Gold Coast trams.

When Lydia Kindred of NRRLtd explained how the train lobby could deliver a better, more scenic bike path ‘with these raised cycleways so we can retain our tracks’ a voice from up the back boomed ‘Pie in the sky!’.

A bloke at the front rose and said ‘My name’s Duncan Dey, and I’m running for Council as a Greens and we will continue the efforts the current Greens have made. In other words, we support trains on the tracks’. The resulting cheers and vigorous applause were a striking contrast to his languid demeanour.

At times the chook raffle in the next room threatened to completely drown out proceedings. The RSL was a fitting locale for live, unplugged, retail politics. Simon, for whom backing trains apparently played well at the last election, enthused that ‘the track is in great condition’.

Deliverable visions

Yet populism and leadership are very different things. Simply reflecting the desires of one’s constituents back to them, while making a scapegoat of others, is not enough. Leadership is about having a vision and being able to deliver on it.

This meeting did little to shift my thinking. I am an unapologetic train lover. But I can tell a toy train from a commuter service, and a realistic proposal from bluster.


Support The Echo

Keeping the community together and the community voice loud and clear is what The Echo is about. More than ever we need your help to keep this voice alive and thriving in the community.

Like all businesses we are struggling to keep food on the table of all our local and hard working journalists, artists, sales, delivery and drudges who keep the news coming out to you both in the newspaper and online. If you can spare a few dollars a week – or maybe more – we would appreciate all the support you are able to give to keep the voice of independent, local journalism alive.

5 COMMENTS

  1. Another needlessly divisive and bitter article from David. The labelling of the attendees as all “trainspotters” is a divisive and a bit unfair. Most are just members of the community who want to be able to catch a train. As for the meeting having “thirty attendees”, I’d hazard a guess that most people are out working at that time of day. Unfortunately we’re not all retired in this area, though its great to hear those who could attend at that time, did.
    Also, a slight misrepresentation of the goals of the rail advocacy here. The “Toyota Coaster” plan is merely one option put forth as an interim measure to preserve and use the railway line, whilst using it. This plus the construction of a shared pathway alongside from Bangalow through to Billinudgel was costed for roughly $60M, so using the $78M mentioned really isn’t the bad suggestion you try to paint it as – that extra $18M would also go a long way in procuring “real trains”, potentially in the form of two or three carriage railmotors, or even some of the soon to be retired NSW ‘Xplorer’ trains, which still have considerable service life and would be perfectly suited to this area. So by the end of it we would have a shared pathway beside the line throughout the entire Shire, preserved and utilised railway tracks, plus potentially the use of two or three carriage “real trains”. And whether its the pathway or the trains, it all can be used by locals and tourists in some way. Not really a terrible suggestion at all!
    As the leaders of Northern Rivers Rail will explain, the on-paper mentions of the group wanting “heritage trains” is merely intended to increase chances of procuring any potential government funding. They are fully supportive of commuter and local-oriented rail and this does remain the vision, but there’s a few more steps needed first to get there. The big challenge here for some people is clearly the need for a bit of vision to understand what the rail advocates are proposing here. Ability to see past one’s nose and comprehend the bigger picture is a trait many seem to lack these days, the article above being no exception.

    Oh and one more thing, the support of ‘trail-beside-rail’ from pro-rail groups is certainly not a “sudden, recent shift” as David falsely claims. TOOT and NRRAG have been very open in their public support of a rail trail beside the railway line since as early as 2014; Seven years ago, and one year after the rail trail group was formed. This paired with his other incorrect statements from his earlier articles makes me question how long he’s been in this area and how educated he actually is on this debate. Or, he just has an incredibly short memory!

    • Exactly WB. If the Echo keeps printing such misinformation, then refuse to give people the right of reply, they’ll have little credibility in the community.

      Professional, investigative journalism should question the agenda of those who ridicule the community’s fight for safe, sustainable, affordable public transport, and pedestrian and cyclist friendly communities.

  2. Regular readers will know I am not a man of few words but I really don’t think I need to say much this time because David has nailed it. I will just summarise by saying what he implied but didn’t dare say explicitly.

    Northern Rivers Rail Limited is a farce created by a delusional group of people suffering from a very serious case of cognitive dissonance and becoming increasingly desperate as the trail construction approaches. I sincerely acknowledge their pain but advise them to urgently come to terms with reality for their own well being. I am deeply concerned that someone will have heart failure on the day the removal of the tracks begins.

  3. I actually enjoyed the borderline satirical tone of this article because it was a fun read. Was it fair to the subjects though?
    I think it probably was. I’ve been following this issue for a long time and have attended a couple of NRAG meetings in Lismore.
    The problem that this group of activists have is that they continuously refuse to recognise that the future usage of this train line will never be sufficient to be financially viable. Not ever. And so the only way that this restored line would be supported would be with huge government subsidy. The pie that is government funding is finite. And so support for this unprofitable line would be at the expense of other public services. I personally love trains and would prefer to take one whenever possible. But I don’t love them more than decent education, health, Parks&Wildlife, or many other essential community benefits that NSW public funding supports

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Mullum locals protest flood-prone pod site

Around 40–50 locals gathered outside the Byron Shire Council chambers this morning to highlight the risks of, and lack of due process around, the selection of the flood accommodation pod site in Mullumbimby.

Council: Goonellabah park not available for pods

Tuesday’s debate in the Lismore Council chambers was mostly about the community’s need for open, green space for sport and recreation balanced against the need for places to live.

Cabarita DA refused on character grounds

Tweed Shire Councillors refused a DA for a four-storey block of flats at 2-6 Tweed Coast Road, Cabarita Beach, despite the staff recommendation of approval.

Concerns over future of Murwillumbah Hospital

Northern NSW Local Health District have sought to reassure locals that facilities won't be downgraded or closed at Murwillumbah Hospital when the controversial new Tweed Valley Hospital in Cudgen near Kingscliff opens in 2023.