8.2 C
Byron Shire
August 16, 2022

Suffolk Park DA given short shrift by Council staff

Latest News

Alarming footage of devastation in Ellis State Forest

Today north coast conservationists say they are shocked and alarmed at footage of the devastation being wrought in Ellis State Forest south of Grafton.

Other News

Cabarita DA refused on character grounds

Tweed Shire Councillors refused a DA for a four-storey block of flats at 2-6 Tweed Coast Road, Cabarita Beach, despite the staff recommendation of approval.

A long and chequered career in cooking

When she was just 16, Elizabeth Jackson was kicked out of a home economics class – not because she burnt a pot or had a collapsed sponge, but because she made a black wedding cake.

Developer sparks storage stress

Byron-based property owner/developer, Josh Thompson, has created a shitstorm within the community after trying to evict customers renting 160 units at his ACE storage facility within a week, to make way for 26 warehouses.

Curved-space robot defies known laws of physics, heralding new locomotive technology possibilities

A robot engineered at Georgia Institute of Technology (Georgia Tech) has done the unthinkable and flouted a steadfast law of motion, suggesting that new laws need to be defined.

Power of the people

Katherine (Letters, 3 August) asked ‘can the power of the people compete...’? The answer is in the recent federal election:...

The CWA turns 100 – There will be scones!

Within 24 hours of its establishment on April 20, 1922, Country Women’s Association (CWA) members began lobbying relevant government ministers for better services for women and children, and that has been their mission ever since.  

Locals are saying that the DA is an overdevelopment of the site that will lead to further gridlock of rads and is not in line with the character of the area.

A large development proposal that would seriously impact two threatened ecological communities in Suffolk Park and diminish the town’s village character, has been given both barrels by Byron Council.

In a decision that effectively sends the developer back to square one, Council staff last week summarily dismissed the application for a mixed-used, three-storey development at 9–15 Clifford Street.

The application, submitted by a Sydney-based property group, involves demolishing nine buildings and replacing them with two new three-storey structures incorporating seven townhouses, 16 housing units and 300m2 of commercial space.

Staff provided 17 separate reasons for refusing the application, including environmental, design, bushfire, amenity and affordable housing features.

‘The development application is not satisfactory having regard to the EP&A Act as it is not in the public interest… and is an overdevelopment of the site,’ staff said.

‘The multi-dwelling housing does not meet numerous planning requirements owing to the design, location and scale of the building, and consequently will not result in a low-density residential development.’

‘It will have an adverse impact on the natural environment by removing native vegetation from the subject site and adjoining Council lot that forms part of at least two threatened ecological communities.’

The decision is a win for the many Suffolk Park residents who opposed the development, including 80 who wrote letters of objection.

These letters covered a wide range of concerns including flood risks, traffic impacts and the impact on the town’s village character.

One of the local opponents of the development, Lynne Richardson, said she was pleased that staff had refused the application but was wary of what the developer might do next.

‘My feeling is that a lot of the community shared the same concerns as the staff,’ Ms Richardson said.

‘I was really pleased that they tackled the scope of the project and the fact that the environment was in grave danger from the proposal’.

‘But we’re concerned that the developer will challenge the decision in the Land and Environment Court.

‘Regardless of what happens we’ll just grit our teeth and keep fighting.’

Bulk and scale

Among the 17 reasons for refusal set out by Council staff was the fact that the bulk and scale of the development contravened planning rules, including those covering floor space ratio.

The development was also inconsistent with the design and character requirements contained in the legislation, staff found.

The developer’s promise that 12 of the 16 units would be used to house key workers was also questioned by staff, who found that the application was ‘lacking in detail to demonstrate that it would actually be used for affordable housing’.


Staff also found that the proposal was not consistent with bushfire regulations, noting that the proposed bushfire management asset protection zone encroached on a neighbouring property without the landowner’s consent.

According to documents within the DA, the proposal is from Denwol Suffolk Pty Ltd, ‘a Sydney-based diversified property group owned by Phillip Wolanski’.

In a written response to The Echo, a Denwol Suffolk representative said that its development complied with height, floor space and parking rules, included 12 affordable housing units and was on a site that was ‘zoned to allow for this type of development’.

Developer replies

‘As you may know, there are so many complex and competing interests surrounding this site, including conflicting Council controls,’ said a spokesperson for the developer.

‘The many community members that attended the community consultation sessions were able to engage with us to understand these complexities and we believe, generally, left feeling positive and energised by the proposed project.’ 

With staff having refused the application, Denwol has the option of either appealing the decision in the Land and Environment Court, or redesigning the development.

The Echo understands that the developer has been told by Council staff that to have a chance of having the development approved, it would need to submit an entirely new development application that involved a complete redesign of the project.

Support The Echo

Keeping the community together and the community voice loud and clear is what The Echo is about. More than ever we need your help to keep this voice alive and thriving in the community.

Like all businesses we are struggling to keep food on the table of all our local and hard working journalists, artists, sales, delivery and drudges who keep the news coming out to you both in the newspaper and online. If you can spare a few dollars a week – or maybe more – we would appreciate all the support you are able to give to keep the voice of independent, local journalism alive.


  1. Has anyone noticed that developers who want to meddle with the lifestyle we enjoy up here, DON’T live here. They just see our region as a place to make big bucks regardless of what the locals want.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Mental health explored at Ballina symposium

250 people attended the first free Community Mental Health Symposium last Thursday at Ballina RSL, with a range of expert speakers from various organisations explaining the dimensions of the problem and how best to move forward.

Have your say on aged care facility in Kingscliff  

The developers of new $150 million redevelopment ‘designed to meet the growing and evolving needs of seniors in the region’, are inviting Kingscliff residents to take part in community consultation.

Fuel stolen from farmer

The cost of fuel continues to be a major consideration in the budget, particularly in country areas where distances travelled are inevitably further for your average daily needs like accessing shops, schools and other activities.

Developer proposes light industrial in Federal

Tasteful, reasonable and useful? Or noisy, oversized and intrusive? This is the question at the heart of the debate over a light industrial development that has been proposed for the heart of Federal.