22.4 C
Byron Shire
March 1, 2021

Criminalising activism a growing trend

Latest News

Police looking for missing Pottsville woman

Police say they are seeking public assistance to locate a woman missing from Pottsville for almost a week.

Other News

Rail trail

Peter Finch, East Lismore At last someone else has put their hand up to question the fluffery and misinformation surrounding...

Tweed Council rejects Casuarina disability viewing platform

Issues of queue jumping, the allocation of Tweed Shire Council’s resources in both time and money, and responding to...

Interview with James McMillan, founder of the Byron Surf Festival

With the Byron Bay Surf Festival just days away, founder James McMillan took a few minutes to talk to Seven about the awesome things planned for the coming weekend.

Community bar – not

Liz Levy, Suffolk Park I couldn’t believe what I was reading in The Echo: a plan to turn an ‘iconic’...

TGA obstructs prescription psilocybin, MDMA

Imagine that some crazy professors convince a bunch of participants at a five-day mindfulness retreat to agree to take part in an experiment where half of them are given magic mushrooms, and half of them a placebo.

Suffolk pump track

Dr Ray Moynihan, Suffolk Park Thanks to The Echo for ongoing coverage of the debate about the proposed pump track...

Over 100 people shut down construction of the controversial Maules Creek coal mine project in northwest NSW, blocking entry to the mine to workers using tripod structures. Photo Flickr/LeardStateForest
Over 100 people shut down construction of the controversial Maules Creek coal mine project in northwest NSW, blocking entry to the mine to workers using tripod structures. Photo Flickr/LeardStateForest

Michael McNamara (Tweed community activist)

In recent years we have seen governments in various jurisdictions increase dramatically the penalties for community members who have the effrontery to oppose the government’s wishes (or those of its corporate allies).

This is an international trend, with examples in the United Kingdom, Canada, the US and various Australian jurisdictions.

Before the last Tasmanian state election the opposition leader, Will Hodgman, proposed fines of $10,000 for protesters defending the state’s old-growth forests from an expansion of the logging industry.

It is yet to be seen what the reaction of Labor premier Lara Giddings will be to those who oppose her recent decision to bring back the pulp mill that Gunn’s had proposed in northern Tasmania.

In Victoria the government is currently proposing fines of up to $8,660 for protesters and increased powers for police to break up protests.

In Queensland, in an apparently unrelated move, the government has introduced draconian legislation that purports to address a threat to civilised society from ‘bikie gangs’.

One problem is that the legislation does not mention bikie gangs. Instead, it talks about ‘unlawful associations’. The definition of what constitutes an ‘unlawful association’ is left to the government of the day.

This is an extremely dangerous road to start travelling down.

Any group that opposes the wishes of the government of the day could be designated as a ‘lawless association’ and if three or more people who were judged by police to be members of the group congregated in one place they could be subject to arrest and imprisonment.

At the moment, the government is talking about separate prisons and pink prison uniforms for bikies jailed under this legislation. They may introduce green prison outfits for others in the future.

This trend of criminalising civil opposition and activism is growing internationally.

Cosy ties

An article in The Guardian yesterday describes the close relationship between state security agencies and energy companies in the UK, Canada and the US.

It outlines the strategy of criminalising community opposition to activities such as fracking and oil pipelines.

Terrorism statutes are being used as the rationale for spying on citizens who are doing nothing more than exercising their democratic right to dissent.

This is a dangerous trend, especially when it happens in so called ‘democratic societies’.

The development of western democratic institutions is littered with attempts by the ‘powers that be’ to limit the rights of the individual or of groups of concerned citizens to express their views.

The often violent struggles that typified the development of the trade union movement are a case in point.

Constitutional democracies typically have a written codex of laws that govern the interaction, and often competing interests, of the individual and the state.

Should anyone think that this is a trend only at national level or overseas then they need look no further than the recent actions of Narrabri Council in seeking to find reasons to close down the protest camps at Leard State Forest and the Pilliga State Forest.

The Narrabri Council, according to Cr Bevan O’Regan, wrote to the fire brigade seeking assistance in finding reasons to close down the camps.

In what looks like an increasingly rare demonstration of common sense it seems that the fire brigade did not participate and, further, expressed their concerns in writing.

This sort of alleged collusion by local government in support of corporate interests should, in a perfect world, be grist for the mill for the Independent Commission Against Corruption (ICAC). Let’s wait to see what happens.

What those in government need to realise is that they are playing with fire in upsetting that balance.

Their recent efforts to defend the interests of powerful vested corporates will not quell the opposition. It will only generate further alienation and opposition.

It will drive that opposition underground and bring about the very situation it supposedly seeks to prevent.

Mostly peaceful

Protest groups in western democracies are, in the main, peaceful and community based.

By criminalising ‘knitting nannas’, as the Victorian government recently tried to do, they will harden the resolve of communities and radicalise normally conservative people.

The sometimes extreme and violent actions of police in protecting the interests of mining companies at various community-based protests throughout NSW in recent years will only encourage more radical and extreme protest actions.

Community-based protest groups are in the main committed to peaceful, non-violent direct action.

This does not equate to non-interventionist protest and it does not mean there will be no risk of injury to those involved.

Waving placards at the side of the road as the corporate juggernauts ride roughshod over your community is not seen as a viable strategy.

The Lock The Gate Alliance (LTGA) is a case in point.

Across the country a coalition of farmers, environmentalists, neighbourhood progress associations, community groups, religious groups, tourism operators and ordinary, individual community members have built a strong and co-ordinated campaign that opposes the rapid, and rabid, expansion of the coal, coal seam gas, shale gas and tight sands gas industries.

The word fracking has entered the vernacular as the verbal equivalent of Claytons, the Scotch you have when you are not having a Scotch.

LTGA is committed to ‘peaceful direct action’, the use of non-violent protest strategies to disrupt and delay the imposition of corporate will.

The possible strategies are endless. The growth of social media in recent years, and the almost innate larrikinism that stereotypically typifies rural Australia, have led to the growth of a wide range of protest activities.

They are not limited to the traditional strategy of ‘locking on’ or physically blocking the developer.

 Mocking the MP

A group of women in Lismore started the Knitting Nannas Against Gas (KNAG) and have targeted their local state MP, Thomas George.

They meet outside his local electoral office each Thursday and ‘knit’. They decorate the oversized picture of him in the window and mock the way he stands, hands on hip, by doing ‘The Thommo’. They then post pictures of their escapades on social media to the great delight of many.

The Girls Against Gas dress up in colourful outfits, like superheroes with their undies on the outside, and perform at various protests.

Although lighthearted in one sense, these groups have a serious message. It is that they have a right to protest and they will not be silenced. It’s almost an ‘in your face and up yours’ approach to social dissent.

Politicians of all persuasions and at all levels fail to take note of the views of their communities at their peril.

In NSW, for instance, National Party MPs are facing the very real prospect of generational traditional supporters voting Green for the first, and possibly only, time in their lives at the next state election.

If you want to see where ‘conspiracy theories’ come from, and why they gain traction, you need look no further than the actions of governments across the western world.

By aligning themselves with the interests of multinational conglomerates, whether it be in relation to mining or GM crops or any other issue, rather than the interests of those they supposedly represent, they lose the trust of ordinary citizens and generate a climate of distrust of all government (and other institutional) decisions and actions.

It’s time for change. We have to be the change, before it’s too late.

 References:

http://www.examiner.com.au/story/1959358/protesters-in-hodgmans-sights/

http://www.abc.net.au/news/2013-11-01/victorian-duck-hunt-protesters-face-massive-penalty-hike/5064920

http://www.theguardian.com/environment/earth-insight/2014/jan/21/fracking-activism-protest-terrorist-oil-corporate-spies

http://www.northerndailyleader.com.au/story/2040267/we-have-stooped-to-gutter-politics/?cs=168


Support The Echo

Keeping the community together and the community voice loud and clear is what The Echo is about. More than ever we need your help to keep this voice alive and thriving in the community.

Like all businesses we are struggling to keep food on the table of all our local and hard working journalists, artists, sales, delivery and drudges who keep the news coming out to you both in the newspaper and online. If you can spare a few dollars a week – or maybe more – we would appreciate all the support you are able to give to keep the voice of independent, local journalism alive.

8 COMMENTS

  1. Australians need to wake up, our diminished civil rights our are increasingly under attack.
    I am constantly amazed by ignorance demonstrated by Australians regarding this very important issue.
    “she’ll be right mate”
    Please realise in that our so called democracy there is no “Bill of Rights”
    I.E constitutional guarantees or protections of civil rights like to right to free assembly, a speedy trial, double indemnity, even free speech can be abridged by the government, we will all be finding more out about this as CSG lobby becomes more powerful in the current political climate, people will begin to realise that they don’t have power over their own lives and even the water they drink.
    Many Australians mystified by the mainstream American attitude to gun laws, fundamental to the argument is that Americans don’t trust government.
    Wake up Australia,before it’s too late, we need a republic and a new constitution with civil rights guarantees that cannot be abridged at the whim of legislators and short term interests.
    We think we are free in this country, in in some ways we are, but beware, it can all go away while you are sleeping.

  2. I have recently detected an increase in civil disobedience as I travel around garnering support for the abolition of the NSW Dept. Primary Industries Local Land Services as it interferes in biosecurity (a Federal Matter) and the end to its extortionate discriminatory funding methods plus the dismissal of the Minister. We, the Public are sick and tired of being pushed around by empire building terrorists we call parliamentarians. I’ve reached the stage where I’m almost ready to march on NSW Parliament House bearing the Eureka Flag. The only trouble is it’s the same flag flown by the corrupt building unions, so I must think of another one.
    TruBluTrev!

  3. PS Guthrie thanks for your comments – however even America is fighting to keep its one last constitutional right – the right to bear arms – which Obama is trying to take away. All the other constitutional rights have been whittled away to nothing. So even having a constitution, bill of rights/civil rights does not guarantee we will have them forever.

    Many of us are getting desperate and struggling to stay within the bounds of what is legal.

    It would be good if there was a performance criteria for politicians and once they fail to protect our environment they are struck out at which time they are replaced with environmental activists. Let the people rule!!!

    Until we can eliminate corruption in politics and kick them out of office I don’t see any hope frankly.

    • Gee, this is NOT an excuse to turn the comments into a pro-gun campaign. It is a support of Non-Violent Direct Action and the right to use it. Anyone with a gun is not non-violent, although certainly might be taking direct action…

  4. Evelyn Hall (and not Voltaire, who she was summarising) said

    I do not agree with what you have to say, but I’ll defend to the death your right to say it.

    One Term Tony and other Liberal mates say

    You do not agree with what I say, and I’ll ensure you’re shutup about it.

  5. We most certainly live in precarious times. The iron fist (of democracy) in a velvet glove! Under no conditions should people be expected to to relinquish their rights for genuine free expression. More so If?? they live in a democracy. People should continue demonstrating against any form of corruption that hinders well being of species and Earth Rights. If our government cannot stand up against the might of Corporations then we must not only challenge the Executive…but seek the means through the Judiciary to truly SPELL OUT the rights of citizens protesting against inflexible/destructive Corporate interests. Whilst it appears that Commercial Interests hold the legal ascendancy over common concerns of citizens there maybe a chink of legal precedent that upholds the rights of concerned citizens in a democracy. Should we push for Constitutional change? Recall the SLAPP actions against demonstrators over 2O years ago? This was a type of Commercial legal application used to muzzle any protesting persons. The SLAPP now defines our democracy it seems! Is this constitutionally permissable?

  6. Right on Michael McNamara!
    The current crop of political and corporate criminals have taken leaves from the Nazi’s book – and they’ve been whittling away at our democracy for at least a decade. Since the September 11 attacks in the US.
    This article http://stormcloudsgathering.com/rule-from-the-shadows-the-psychology-of-power-part-1 includes some useful reading to help those who want to understand how ‘they’ are controlling us – and how to fight back.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Truth

Dr Matt Landos, East Ballina There is the real news and then there is the fake news. The radio news announced recently new economic figures showing...

Monkey see

Daniel Brown, Byron Bay Back in my early youth growing up in Mt Eliza Victoria in the ‘90s I’d secretly look up to and admire...

Australia’s bastardry

Gareth W R Smith, Byron Bay Australia has a long string of racist and anti-humanitarian policies. These range from its treatment of Aboriginal people, complicity...

Mt Warning ban

Chris Gee, Byron Bay Indigenous readers be advised that the following letter contains references to persons deceased. I read with some interest and also, I am...