Brunswick Heads locals to debate ‘shock and awe’ redevelopment

Large gravel was laid on the southern breakwater wall late last week in preparation for sealing with bitumen.

Large gravel was laid on the southern breakwater wall late last week in preparation for sealing with bitumen.

Luis Feliu

Controversial plans by the state government to redevelop the Brunswick Heads boat harbour, including dredging and a new marina, is set to be hotly debated tonight (Monday) at a public meeting.

The government this week is pushing ahead with the contentious dredging of the harbour and Brunswick River, as well as the asphalting of the popular southern breakwater wall at the mouth of the river, with no prior consultation of residents.

Brunswick Heads Progress Association’s meeting at 7pm in the town’s memorial hall will look at the latest little-known plan by the Crown Lands division of the primary industries department for a new marina, commercial buildings and large car park for the boat harbour precinct.

It will also discuss the asphalting of the entire length of one of the most popular walkways on the north coast, the southern breakwater wall, which began without notice last week, as well as the dredging plan which is expected to start this week.

Some locals say the combined plans amount to ‘shock and awe’ tactics by the government, given the lack of community consultation.

The Greens say the foreshore development plans are ‘grossly un-democratic’ which have shut out the community, and combined with redevelopment plans for the town’s three public caravan parks, amounting to a perceived ‘take-over’ of the town.

They say the proposed works will fundamentally change the character of the town and destroy the much-loved atmosphere and environment of the small coastal community.

Locals were outraged last week when heavy machinery descended on Torakina beach for the breakwall-bitumen plan, which Crown Lands had proposed and approved itself.

But it appears it’s too late to stop the asphalting of the breakwater pathway, as large crushed gravel was laid on its surface late last week in preparation for its tarring.

Progress association secretary Patricia Warren told Echonetdaily the Crown Lands office at Newcastle were ‘well aware of the public meeting’ and of opposition to the asphalting.

The length of the popular walkway laid with gravel late last week.

The length of the popular walkway laid with gravel late last week.

‘Thus it would be an act of utter bastardry to lay materials ahead of the scheduled time, as they were to concentrate only on rock replacement and stabilisation before attending to the crest of the breakwater,’ Ms Warren said.

Locals had suggested to Crown Lands they use an alternative surface, such as compressed hailstone,m so it would look more natural, but an engineer told them maintenance of that type of treatment would be more costly than bitumen.

Byron Shire Council told locals there had been no development application (DA) lodged with council for the work and ‘Crown Land had approved the work itself under State Environmental Planning (Infrastructure SEPP) policy, and thus avoided consulting the community.

As for the breakwater works,  a departmental spokesman told Echonetdaily that ‘a comprehensive environmental assessment was completed’ for the project and the department had ‘consulted Roads and Maritime Service, Office of Environment and Heritage, Byron Shire Council and the Brunswick Harbour Consultative Committee which represents river users’.The Evans Head breakwater wall was asphalted a week ago. The same treatment is due to be being given this week to the southern breakwater on the Brunswick River.

The Evans Head breakwater wall was asphalted a week ago. The same treatment is due to be being given this week to the southern breakwater on the Brunswick River.

When pressed on the makeup of the so-called ‘consultative committee’, the spokesman said its membership included ’the Department of Primary Industries, Brunswick Heads Cruising Yacht Association, the harbour master, Office of Environment and Heritage, Brunswick Fishermen’s Coop, Byron Shire Council, Roads and Maritime Service, Byron Police and Marine Rescue NSW’.

No residents groups were involved as a result, just government agencies and two select interest groups.

The dredging works, the spokesman said, will cost around $410,000 and will involve dredging around 10,000 cubic metres of clean marine sand from the Brunswick River channel and pumped north to New Brighton Beach ‘where it will be used for beach re-nourishment’.

Some 1,500 cubic metres of other material will be dredged from the boat harbour, pumped into geotextile bags and then taken to landfill.

The breakwall repair and ‘upgrade’ will cost around $230,000 and involves the placement of 200 tonnes of armour rock to fill voids along the face and head of the structure to improve the integrity of the breakwater.

The job, the spokesman said, will take around two weeks and ‘completed by sealing the crest surface with a 2.4 metres wide asphalt path to improve public access’.

10 responses to “Brunswick Heads locals to debate ‘shock and awe’ redevelopment”

  1. Madi says:

    Don’t kill Brunswick

  2. Ken says:

    OOPS ! Too late.

  3. larry says:

    seriously its not taking over the world just maintaining the walkway and wall. they’re not killing brunswick.
    the kingscliff south wall has just been done and it has made it a lot safer than it was and more accessible for all. bike riders,wheelchairs, strollers etc.

    sometimes people just object to everything. is there anything that has been done by government that we don’t have someone complaining about in this area. we re lucky that our amenities are being maintained.

    you lot would probably complain that there was no community consultation if they fixed all the potholes in the roads as well.

    give it a break

  4. Ra says:

    Residents bulldozed by the State Gov’t again! They could just leave the crushed gravel as is. NO ASPHALT! Asphalt is hot and sticky in summer, and ugly to look at. Besides, it’s hard to believe the current groyne is being restored as is, since the design is seriously flawed. Navigation is extremely risky for boats through a too narrow outlet and many have been wrecked. The design should be wider, and take one arm further out with a right-angle elbow to create a still-water entry.
    We want to keep our low-key natural sea-side town as it is.

    • Greg says:

      If you make the entrance wider, the river flow velocity will be reduced, leading to a shallower, hence more dangerous bar. The angled section sounds nice on paper, but the longshore drift of sand heading north would be slowed, resulting in increased deposition of sand. Again, the result is a more dangerous bar. The only way that I can see around it would be to extend the south wall out far enough to create an entrance from the north with your angle.

      As for the proposed dredging, the sand will be back before the year is out, so the net result will be a severely disturbed habitat for no real gain.

    • Len Heggarty says:

      They need new tar for a housing estate at the end of the road. Just peer over the edge for a new pier garden for the cruisers and another rock wall to push back the ocean.

  5. Serena DOLINSKA says:

    Whatever happened to community consultation and information? Not liking the way this is being handled.

  6. rasa says:

    Great job. The area has been neglected for too long. The harbour has had a shanty town look for a long time.
    Need a marina in Tweed as well.
    Makes the place safe and attracts tourism.
    Well done.

  7. Geoffrey Suthon says:

    No doubt the meeting tonight will be full of the usual “experts” on the dredging and wall maintenance issues, who will be enthusiastically voicing their well thought-out expert opinions.

  8. Anne Trice says:

    i think it’s Great, if they had community consultation it would years, and years and years. With the likes of the Greens in this area nothing is ever allowed to change. The whole river needs dredging just look around the front of Terrace Reserve you couldn’t reach the bottom of the river in most places in the middle now you can walk across on high tide.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Echonetdaily is made possible by the support of all of our advertisers.