Menu

Major parties vote down Greens CSG bill on land access

The Greens have slammed both the coalition government and Labor for voting down a bill which would have given landholders the right to say no to coal and gas mining on their land and to ban fracking,

Greens Candidate for Richmond, Dawn Walker, said Labor joined with the government last week in the senate to shut down the Greens attempt to give landowners a say over mining on their land ‘despite strong community support’.

But Labor’s federal Richmond MP Justine Elliot deflected the criticism, saying land access ‘is within the jurisdiction and responsibility of state governments’, and that landowners should be allowed to refuse CSG mining on their properties.

Mrs Elliot blamed the National Party for expanding coal-seam gas across NSW and that state Labor had a CSG moratorium bill before the NSW upper house ‘that would protect our region from this industry’.

‘It is the National’s pro-CSG expansion agenda across the north coast that threatens our way of life: they have broken all their election promises about CSG licences and they can’t be trusted,’ the MP said.

But Ms Walker said voting down the Greens bill was ‘another disappointing example of Labor and the Nationals ignoring the voices of hundreds of people and organisations that contributed to this inquiry, with 95 per cent of them supporting the bill’.

‘Rather than allow landholders the right to say no to coal and gas mining on their land and to ban fracking, Labor and the Nationals stood with the big mining companies,’ Ms Walker said.

‘The balance of influence in Canberra at the moment is not with the landholders but is hopelessly skewed towards big coal and gas.

‘It’s disappointing that Labor and the Nationals can sit and listen to the impassioned plea from our farmers and landholders but at the end of the day they side with the big mining companies who have given them large political donations.

‘Farmers, like our landholders in the northern rivers just cannot compete with this influence.

‘I will continue to stand strong with local farmers, traditional owners and northern rivers councils, who want to protect their land, water and climate.

‘Our representatives in Canberra need to listen to the community instead of their big mining donors, and transition away from polluting fossil fuels towards a clean energy future,’ Ms Walker said.

The war of words comes as Lock the Gate says NSW is set to release new areas to CSG exoploration and that farmland and water catchments are still not safe.

Last week, the government launched a Strategic Release Framework for Coal and Petroleum, which will reopen the state to new applications for coal seam gas exploration and harmonise the release processes for coal and gas exploration titles.

But Lock the Gate Alliance says that the government has squibbed on setting hard constraints against coal seam gas anywhere but the Hunter Valley horse breeding and winegrowing lands, and that critical farmland and precious water resources in the rest of the state will now once again be under threat.

Lock the Gate NSW Coordinator, Georgina Woods said that ‘with no hard constraints preventing licences being handed out in inappropriate areas, like Sydney’s drinking water catchment, the northern rivers, or important farmland, the government could grant new exploration licences over areas where they just spent tax-payers money buying back licences.’

‘Has the whole exercise been an expensive waste of time?’ she said.

‘The conflict and decimation being visited on communities like Maules Creek, Bylong, Wybong and Breeza by mining could be prevented with up front constraints on mining, but this program does not deliver.

‘We detect the sulphurous stench of the coal industry’s interference here.’

 


3 responses to “Major parties vote down Greens CSG bill on land access”

  1. Ken says:

    Who was it that said, ‘Money doesn’t talk, it swears !’?
    G”)

  2. Carol Gilmore says:

    I’m completely dismayed by our government’s lack of moral fibre. They lie, are corrupt and are far from representative of their constituents, and they do it all so blatently! Shame!!! I find no arguement with my sons when they say the government of today doesn’t represent the community or even the people who voted them in and I can’t blame them for not wanting to vote in elections. Where are we headed????

  3. CG says:

    The government is actually doing a good job looking at the facts of this Industry instead of the hype and mistruths put out by LTG and other activists. I think it is critical for genuine landholder engagement; responsible companies will not enter a property without landholder consent. However, Australian resources are owned by all the people and an individual should not have the right of absolute veto.

    Interestingly, an independent report was recently released by the Government: “Review of the socioeconomic impacts of coal seam gas in Queensland” (http://www.industry.gov.au/Office-of-the-Chief-Economist/Publications/Pages/Coal-Seam-Gas.aspx). I note that the report did not draw off of local landholders and community groups which perhaps is a flaw although the report justifies this saying “Instead, the review has relied on the perspectives of the GasFields Commission and the researchers who have been working very closely with these communities”

    The report summary states:
    It found that the economic impacts of CSG development are consistent with other natural resource developments, with net positive impacts on employment, income, output, and government revenue. Broader community impacts, including social, demographic, and health outcomes, differ from other developments as a result of the geospatial dispersion of CSG activities and uncertainties about potential environmental impacts.

    The review also provides a range of insights and lessons learnt, including the need for early and genuine community engagement to achieve successful coexistence between the gas industry and local communities.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

 

Become a supporter of The Echo

A note from the editorial team

Some of The Echo’s editorial team: journalists Paul Bibby and Aslan Shand, editor Hans Lovejoy, photographer Jeff Dawson and Mandy Nolan

The Echo has never underestimated the intelligence and passion of its readers. In a world of corporate banality and predictability, The Echo has worked hard for more than 30 years to help keep Byron and the north coast unique with quality local journalism and creative ideas. We think this area needs more voices, reasoned analysis and ideas than just those provided by News Corp, lifestyle mags, Facebook groups and corporate newsletters.

The Echo is one hundred per cent locally owned and one hundred per cent independent. As you have probably gathered from what is happening in the media industry, it is not cheap to produce a weekly newspaper and a daily online news service of any quality.

We have always relied entirely on advertising to fund our operations, but often loyal readers who value our local, independent journalism have asked how they could help ensure our survival.

Any support you can provide to The Echo will make an enormous difference. You can make a one-off contribution or a monthly one. With your help, we can continue to support a better informed local community and a healthier democracy for another 30 years.”

Echonetdaily is made possible by the support of all of our advertisers and is brought to you by this week's sponsor  Falls Festival