Lack of evidence cited for Bruns tree poisoning

A proposal for Short Street in Brunswick Heads has been met with unified opposition from the Brunswick Heads Progress Association. Image from DA.

Paul Bibby

Byron Council says it has insufficient evidence to undertake enforcement action over an alleged tree poisoning on the site of a proposed development in Brunswick Heads.

Earlier this month, Council hired an independent botanist to examine three large hoop pines at 16 Short Street, which appeared to have been tampered with, and were showing signs of distress.

The property is the site of a proposal to build two double-storey houses, each with five bedrooms and five bathrooms, that has drawn strong objections from some local residents.


In a statement to Echonetdaily, a Council spokesperson said that the botanist’s investigation had not provided ‘the level of evidence required to proceed with any formal enforcement action in relation to the alleged tree poisoning’.

‘The Development Application [DA] for the subject property otherwise remains under the assessment by staff,’ the spokesperson said.

Support The Echo

Keeping the community together and the community voice loud and clear is what The Echo is about. More than ever we need your help to keep this voice alive and thriving in the community.

Like all businesses we are struggling to keep food on the table of all our local and hard working journalists, artists, sales, delivery and drudges who keep the news coming out to you both in the newspaper and online. If you can spare a few dollars a week – or maybe more – we would appreciate all the support you are able to give to keep the voice of independent, local journalism alive.

3 responses to “Lack of evidence cited for Bruns tree poisoning”

  1. Miles shorten says:

    Ah yes familiar reply from council over tree poisoning….I have known of cases where people admitted to council they have poisoned only to have council still back away from following through whilst sending out useless letters to nearby residents “appealing for evidence” and “assistance” etc .

  2. john says:

    very suspicious

  3. Nerida says:

    Arghhh! Tree poisoners are gutless, irresponsible, shit-for-brains cowards.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Echonetdaily is made possible by the support of all of our advertisers.