Byron’s Code of Conduct inconsistent

I would like to thank the Echo for shining some light on the inconsistencies of Byron Shire Council’s Code of Conduct (Echo 13/1). Having extensive personal experience of code play as a councillor and having advised Angela Dunlop, the volunteer in this matter, I feel there is more to be said.

Cr Ibrahim clearly breached the code by contacting a tender applicant prior to a contract being signed. He had a code violation brought against him, not by the GM but by a member of the community. As a result he had his case assessed by a council-paid ‘examiner’ with all the checks and protections afforded by the code. He walked away with a recommendation of, ‘no further action’.

On the other hand a volunteer Angela Dunlop, not getting answers from council, approached a contractor for information (after the contract had been let) in the hope that as manager of SGB community centre she could continue doing her job. The GM (Mr Ken Gainger) instead of ringing Angela and offering to facilitate the information his staff was not supplying slapped her with a code of conduct charge, ‘improper or unethical conduct and/or abuse of power’.

Angela wrote back refuting the GM’s version of events, asked questions and requested an interview as she thought the code stipulated. Mr Gainger did not respond for 11 weeks and then sent a letter, ‘guilty as charged, formal penalty of “censure” imposed’.

Detailed complaints to the Office of Local Government and the Ombudsman produced the ‘helpful’ advice, that while volunteers were subject to the same penalties as councillors and staff they did not enjoy the same protections under the code. In other words volunteers were completely in the hands of the GM and if they didn’t like it they could contact their local member.

Mr Gainger was so pleased with his work that he failed to mention, in his annual code of conduct report to council, that he had officially censured a volunteer.

Several councillors have been aware of these events but have sat on their hands, hopefully they will now ask some questions.

Tom Tabart, Bangalow


2 responses to “Byron’s Code of Conduct inconsistent”

  1. Len Heggarty says:

    I have found that the meaning of “volunteer” has changed markedly.
    A volunteer works voluntarily without pay because they love their work.
    Anyone who gets paid for work, would they do that?
    No. Therefore they are there for the money.
    Any worker who is paid and gets put off and the pay office won’t pay them do then then volunteer without getting paid.
    So for every minute, every hour and every day that a volunteer works in a job, they are being sanctioned, as they are being ostracised as they are not paid and they are treated differently when they are not paid and they are a lot poorer that the paid worker is a lot richer.
    A volunteer is like Gold, and a service station full of oil. They love to work for nothing.

  2. Joe Monks says:

    Codes of conduct are becoming extinct as the global pursuit of profit at any price takes hold.

    Councillors increasingly represent the vested interests of profit takers and therefore have a confused view of what a code of conduct comprises.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Echonetdaily is made possible by the support of all of our advertisers and is brought to you by this week's sponsors Artstate Lismore and NORPA. Sponsors-747-ArtState-NORPA-480px