Australia’s eSafety Commissioner has released its second report under world-leading transparency powers showing some of the biggest tech companies aren’t living up to their responsibilities to tackle the proliferation of child sexual exploitation, sexual extortion and the livestreaming of child sexual abuse.
In February this year, eSafety issued legal notices to Twitter (subsequently rebranded as ‘X’), Google, TikTok, Twitch and Discord under Australia’s Online Safety Act. The new transparency powers required the tech companies to answer questions about measures they have in place to deal with the issue.
Serious shortfalls
The report which summarises their answers, highlights serious shortfalls in how some companies detect, remove and prevent child sexual abuse material and grooming, inconsistencies in how companies deal with this material across their different services and significant variations in the time it takes them to respond to public reports.
eSafety Commissioner Julie Inman Grant said the proliferation of online child sexual exploitation is a growing problem both in Australia and globally and technology companies have a moral responsibility in protecting children from sexual exploitation and abuse being stored, shared and perpetrated on their services. ‘We really can’t hope to have any accountability from the online industry in tackling this issue without meaningful transparency which is what these notices are designed to surface,’ said Ms Inman Grant.
‘Our first report featuring Apple, Meta, Microsoft, Skype, Snap, WhatsApp and Omegle uncovered serious shortfalls in how these companies were tackling this issue.
They need to do better
‘This latest report also reveals similar gaps in how these five tech companies are dealing with the problem and how they are tackling the rise in sexual extortion and we need them all to do better.
Ms Inman Grant said this about serious crimes being playing out on these platforms committed by predatory adults against innocent children. ‘The community expects every tech company to be taking meaningful action.
‘Importantly, next year we will have industry codes and standards in place which work hand-in-hand with these Basic Online Safety Expectations transparency powers to ensure companies are living up to these responsibilities to protect children.’
Non compliance
eSafety also found that two providers, Twitter/X and Google, did not comply with the notices given to them, with both companies failing to adequately respond to a number of questions in their respective notices.
Google has been issued a formal warning, notifying it of its failure to comply due to the company providing a number of generic responses to specific questions and providing aggregated information when asked questions about specific services.
Twitter/X’s non-compliance was found to be more serious with the company failing to provide any response to some questions, leaving some sections entirely blank. In other instances, Twitter/X provided a response that was otherwise incomplete and/or inaccurate.
Twitter/X did not respond to a number of key questions including the time it takes the platform to respond to reports of child sexual exploitation; the measures it has in place to detect child sexual exploitation in livestreams; and the tools and technologies it uses to detect child sexual exploitation material.
Safety and public policy staff
The company also failed to adequately answer questions relating to the number of safety and public policy staff still employed at Twitter/X following the October 2022 acquisition and subsequent job cuts.
Twitter/X has been issued with an infringement notice for $610,500 and has 28 days to request the withdrawal of the infringement notice or to pay the penalty. If Twitter chooses not to pay the infringement notice, it is open to the Commissioner to take other action. eSafety has also published a statement, called a service provider notification, about the non-compliance by Twitter/X.
Ms Inman Grant said Twitter/X and Google’s non-compliance was disappointing especially as the questions relate to the protection of children and the most egregious forms of online harm.
‘Twitter/X has stated publicly that tackling child sexual exploitation is the number 1 priority for the company, but it can’t just be empty talk, we need to see words backed up with tangible action.
‘If Twitter/X and Google can’t come up with answers to key questions about how they are tackling child sexual exploitation they either don’t want to answer for how it might be perceived publicly or they need better systems to scrutinise their own operations. Both scenarios are concerning to us and suggest they are not living up to their responsibilities and the expectations of the Australian community.’
Some of the key findings in the report featuring
Twitter/X, TikTok, Google, Twitch and Discord include:
- While YouTube, TikTok and Twitch are taking steps to detect child sexual exploitation in livestreams, Discord is not, saying it is ‘prohibitively expensive’. Twitter/X did not provide the information required.
- TikTok and Twitch use language analysis technology to detect CSEA activity such as sexual extortion across all parts of their services whereas Discord does not use any such detection technology at all. Twitter/X uses tools on public content, but not on direct messages. Google uses technology on YouTube, but not on Chat, Gmail, Meet and Messages.
- Google (with the exception of its search service) and Discord are not blocking links to known child sexual exploitation material, despite the availability of databases from expert organisations like the UK-based Internet Watch Foundation.
- YouTube, TikTok and Twitch are using technology to detect grooming, whereas Twitter/X, Discord and other Google services are not (Meet, Chat, Gmail, Messages).
- Google is not using its own technology to detect known child sexual exploitation videos on some of its services – Gmail, Chat, Messages.
- In the three months after Twitter/Xs change in ownership in October 2022, the proactive detection of child sexual exploitation material fell from 90 per cent to 75 per cent. It said its proactive detection rate had subsequently improved in 2023.
- For Discord and Twitch, which are partly community-moderated services, professional safety staff are not automatically notified when a volunteer moderator identifies child sexual exploitation and abuse material.
- Significant variations in median response times to user reports of child sexual exploitation material exist – TikTok says it responds within five minutes for public content, Twitch takes eight minutes, Discord took 13 hours for direct messages, while Twitter/X and Google did not provide the information required.
- Significant variation in the languages covered by content moderators. Google said it covers at least 71 and TikTok 73. In comparison Twitter said it covered only 12 languages, Twitch reported 24 and Discord report 29. This means that some of the top five non-English languages spoken at home in Australia are not by default covered by Twitter, Discord and Twitch moderators. This is particularly important for harms like grooming or hate speech which require context to identify.
The full report can be found here.
For four decades The Echo has printed the stories some people loved, some people hated, and some pretended not to read. If you want us to keep telling the truth, the real truth, not the sugar-coated version. We’ll need your support to keep the presses rolling. 
