Sitting at number five of the world’s top ten countries with the highest deforestation rate, Australia is only beaten by Brazil, India, Indonesia and Tanzania. Spot number six is taken out by Myanmar who, on average, cleared over 100,000 hectares less than Australia between 2015–2020.
New Year’s day saw native forest logging cease in Western Australia and eastern Victoria, however, yesterday (10 January) Federal Court judge Justice Perry dismissed the historic legal challenge to the agreement that allows logging in north-eastern NSW native forests.
The North East NSW Regional Forest Agreement (North East RFA) covers the vast coastal area between Sydney and the Queensland border, and exempts logging from federal environmental assessment under the Environmental Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (EPBC Act).
North East Forest Alliance (NEFA) had challenged the extension of the Regional Forest Agreement (RFA) in 2018 based on 1997 data, without requiring a new assessment arguing that when the RFA was renewed in 2018 for another 20 years, the Commonwealth did not assess climate change, endangered species or old-growth forests as it was required to. The extension was allowed by NSW Liberal Premier Gladys Berejiklian and Liberal Prime Minister Scott Morrison who decided that they would not do a new assessment and, without any consideration of climate change, extended the existing RFA indefinitely as a variation.
This decision was strongly objected to in 2018 by then opposition environment spokesperson and now NSW Minister for the Environment, Penny Sharpe, who said the science underpinning the RFAs is out of date and incomplete, committing that ALP Labor will not sign off on a rollover of the RFAs until there is a proper, independent, scientific assessment of their outcomes, and the assumptions of the original RFAs are revisited.
Political decision
‘The decision by the court, that native forest logging is technically lawful, is a devastating blow for our forests but should not be mistaken for an endorsement of native forest logging and should rather be seen as a warning shot to the NSW and Commonwealth governments that native forest logging must be reviewed urgently and ended as soon as possible. The court confirmed that in no uncertain terms, this matter is wholly political,’ said Greens MP and spokesperson for the environment Sue Higginson.
Union welcomes decision
However, the Australian Workers’ Union (AWU) has welcomed the Federal Court’s rejection of a legal challenge against forestry in NSW.
‘Thousands of workers’ jobs were at risk if the EDO was successful as it could have led to the suspension of forestry in NSW, Victoria, Tasmania and WA,’ stated the AWU in a press release.
‘Justice Melissa Perry found intergovernmental forestry agreements should be matters for elected governments rather than courts to decide.’
EPBCA needs review
‘The finding confirms what experts and reviews are consistently saying, that our federal environmental laws are outdated and ineffective and represent political failure,’ explained Ms Higginson.
‘It is extremely disappointing that after a five year legal battle this process of not requiring a contemporaneous assessment has been legally validated,’ NEFA President Dailan Pugh said.
‘The decision to not require a new assessment put at risk the survival of a multitude of species that have rapidly declined since 1997, including many nationally threatened species that are not adequately protected under NSW’s logging rules and are being significantly impacted.’
NEFA have identified that within north-east NSW’s state forests that are currently being logged, or proposed for imminent logging, there are nationally significant populations of over 11 nationally threatened animal species and 13 plant species. Of particular concern are the endangered koala, southern greater glider, spotted-tailed quoll, Hastings River mouse, rufous scrub bird, and giant barred frog.
‘We’re disappointed by today’s decision. Without law reform, it means that native forest logging in the region will continue to be exempt from Commonwealth environmental assessment for at least another 20 years,’ said Environmental Defenders Office (EDO) Managing Lawyer Andrew Kwan.
‘This could have devastating consequences for wildlife and forests. It is vital that our remaining native forests are properly protected by a reformed federal legal framework that includes strong national oversight.’
NEFA vice-president Susie Russell pointed out that, ‘We are in the midst of extinction and climate crises, aggravated by the 2019/20 wildfires, rising temperatures and logging, so it is reprehensible that these species are still not receiving the immediate increase in protection Professor Samuel’s [independent] review of the RFAs identified as needed back in 2020’ as part of his review of the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (EPBC Act).
‘The evidence of serious, and in some areas irreversible, impacts on the environment by native forest logging is beyond dispute,’ Ms Higginson said.
‘The fact that the law would allow this to continue is an indictment on all governments that have allowed the logging to continue without review. Everyday that native forest logging is allowed to continue is another day that threatened species, healthy ecosystems and climate impacts are disregarded in favour of vested interests in the logging industry. Workers and communities should be resourced appropriately to accept that native forest logging must come to an end
‘The responsibility for changing the law and ending the pointless destruction of native forests now sits firmly with the state and federal environment ministers. The NSW Minister for the Environment, Penny Sharpe, made it clear in 2018 that the RFA should not be extended without a thorough review of the system and health of the environment and our forests. This is her opportunity to conduct that review and place a moratorium on all native forest logging while the review is undertaken.’
Senator Janet Rice, Australian Greens Forests Spokesperson said ‘The logging industry should be subject to the same environmental standards as all other industries. Today’s decision has shown once again that our federal environment laws including the regional forest agreements are broken.’
Ms Russell agreed saying, ‘It is time for Tanya Plibersek to provide the immediate protection for threatened species identified as required by Professor Samuel in 2020 and for Penny Sharpe to step up and end this sham RFA.’
It was all too difficult for the poor old (not named but probably ready for retirement old school geezer) judge so he threw it back to the govt , which happens to be labor, but it wouldn’t matter really would it, the result will be the same. Plibersek will no doubt dither around and say all the right sounding stuff, but ultimately do bugger all. Dog forbid we actually grow trees for logging in this country, no, let’s cut down the old stuff, it’s just sitting there after all…
If the Judicial Courts are throwing vital Environmental decisions back to the Executive Political Culture then we can say that Australian Democracy is definitely doomed . The separation of powers thus defines a Democracy. We see that biodiversity and old growth Forests, in a climate crisis will continue to be slaughtered by Capitalist dictates that reveal entrenched elements of Authoritarianism! The Australian Continent continues to flood as forests are destroyed and consequently flooded, taking with them all biodiversity and endangered species. Developers linger, keen to develop on resultant Flood Plains. All Sentient life is connected. Wake up Australia for the sake of ALL Sentient life.
That strategy of being extremists and completely opposing any use of our state forests to obtain renewable resources – it’s working out really well isn’t it?
It’s not renewable unless it’s renewed. No amount of saplings can replace mature forest, especially for useful wildlife habitat.
All we’ve seen for the last 40 odd years is ongoing destruction without any serious attempt to replace native forest logging with plantations on a similar amount of the mostly degraded farmlands, though that’s what’s been promised since the early eighties.
Unlike chimney sweeps and whalers before them, timber workers can be redeployed in the new plantation forestry and not only softwood, though hardwoods are going to take longer – so better get started.
If the Greenies want to tackle the real deforestation issue in NSW its private land estate development and industrial farming sitting in the jurisdiction of local councils and government. Look around your own area and see how many trees have been cleared for housing or for crops never to be replanted in recent years. At least the trees taken out of state forests are replanted. So what’s Sue Higginson, the rice farmer’s opinion on paddocks of trees being cleared for farming for crops like rice?
The ‘Greenies’, through decades of good works managed to get the Protection of the Environment Operations Act 1997 NSW (POEO Act). Various other legislation include Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, Mining Act 1992, Plantations and Re afforestation Act 1999, Rural Lands Protection Act 1998 etc. under which the clearing of any tree over the diameter of a CD would require assessment but the red-necks and the minority coalition of the ‘Liberal ‘ and ‘National ‘ ilk have treasonously contrived to revert to the ‘open -slather ‘ destruction of the environment that they and obviously you, prefer.
Of course clearing native vegetation for crops, rice, cotton, blue-berries should be prosecuted and the perpetrators hung by the b***s and then shot, just like the Turnbull family that murdered the Environmental Inspection Officer.
Cheers, G”)
There are large areas on my property that I don’t use, that have no trees, I have to keep killing any trees that try to grow because restrictions kick in about a certain height, otherwise there would be 20-year-old native trees there. Well done.
Renewable simply means ‘able to be renewed’. It doesn’t work if the sun is not shining or the wind is not blowing. Hang-on, what are we talking about again?
Yeh good one Ken, dictate to the people whom have bought and paid for their land what they can and can’t do on it. Well mate, socialist mantra like that does not fit into the Australian way of life, like it or not.
It wouldn’t matter if the logging of one percent of the forests were allowed, the woke lefty greens would still not be happy, they will never be happy untill all progress is ceased, we all ride push bikes, we all eat bugs, we all live in caves. The world is slowly waking up to their lunacy, wokeism is being rejected in Europe, UK, The Netherlands to mention a few recent changes of governments to conservatism. The recent WEF Davos bullshit sessions are widely reported as wokeism gone mad, they have been unmasked to reveal socialist communist attempted control of every nation. Don’t you just love it when alleged conspiracy theories are revealed as being true. Joachy, once again, you belong to an overwhelmingly small minority of whinging little sad people whom starve for relevance.