10.4 C
Byron Shire
August 15, 2022

Properties at Belongil beachfront should be removed

Latest News

Mud benda rant

Regarding last week’s Splendour Festival and all the ‘haters’ out there. I took along a few seriously fun-deprived teenage...

Other News

Beekeepers can get a permit to move hives away from flood water

With so many challenges currently surrounding the bee industry, it comes as a relief to many that NSW Department of Primary Industries will issue a special group permit for beekeepers in flood warning areas to move their hives to higher ground.

A well-thought-out blend

Noy Ben Ami says that he ‘feels the vibe of the crowd and place’ before he starts to play his original music.

NSW bans public display of Nazi symbol

In an historic moment a new law making it a criminal offence to knowingly display a Nazi symbol in public without a reasonable excuse, has passed NSW Parliament yesterday.

Comment: Time for another Police Royal Commission? 

It might be time for another investigation into the NSW Police Force, but this time, the police conduct under the microscope would be alleged overreach in the application of certain powers.

Evans Head, Iron Gates DA public planning meeting coming

The current development application (DA) for the flood and bushfire-prone site of the Evans Head, Iron Gates development will go before the Northern Rivers Planning Panel (NRPP) on 30 August.

Undesirable

​​An undeniable purpose in living is enjoyment, due to the fact that we have the capability to enjoy. What...

And so the rock wall fiasco at Belongil beach, that has been on one Byron shire councillor’s agenda since day one, finally goes on public display for a mere three weeks.

Originally 100 metres at Manfred Street, suddenly it’s 1.6km with a walkway on top.

Why? To avoid litigation from a handful of wealthy dune dwellers.

How? With the assistance of four willfully-ignorant conservative councillors.

Result if built – loss of beach, tourism dollar, endangered species of birds nesting at the mouth of the Belongil estuary and further possible litigation from Elements resort for loss of their own foreshore and amenity.

Argued to be the cheapest way to save half a dozen properties camped on the dunes themselves, it will more likely be the costliest ‘solution’ to appease council’s most vocal litigant.

Think the massive cost of replenishing sand by pumping from Tallow beach. In 1864 the sea penetrated from Tallow beach as far as Belongil creek!

Could that happen again once sands are dug from there and those dunes disturbed and eroded?

Then there are ongoing maintenance costs for the wall itself.

And if punitive levies aren’t imposed on Belongil residents and the entire electorate to cover the cost of sand replenishment, then tourism businesses will suffer greatly from the loss of our greatest asset, that wonderful sweeping beach that is the Bay.

As far as I am concerned, the cheapest option in the long run, has to be the removal of those properties that prevent the dunes from doing their job.

With those gone, I am confident the dunes will do what they have always done for decades to come, protect us all.

And if we look at precedents set internationally, no one is paying to save properties falling into the sea in the UK and on the Californian coast. Buyers beware!

So maybe we should just call their bluff and not scurry to ruin the town by saving the few.

By saving those properties hugging our dunes and preventing the dunes from doing their job, we are setting a precedent ourselves to rock the entire east coast of Australia. Think about that!

Jan Hackett, Sunrise


Support The Echo

Keeping the community together and the community voice loud and clear is what The Echo is about. More than ever we need your help to keep this voice alive and thriving in the community.

Like all businesses we are struggling to keep food on the table of all our local and hard working journalists, artists, sales, delivery and drudges who keep the news coming out to you both in the newspaper and online. If you can spare a few dollars a week – or maybe more – we would appreciate all the support you are able to give to keep the voice of independent, local journalism alive.

2 COMMENTS

  1. Have a look at some old photos of Byron Bay. The dunes feeding the beach were actually located where fletcher street and Lawson street are – before mining and development. So following your logic, we should remove the car park, swimming pool, beach hotel, surf club and all the shops on Lawson street and then let the dunes reform in their rightful home. This was the location of the dunes when the land at Belongil was sold as the first land release in Byron in the late 1800s because of it’s height. There are not half a dozen houses at Belongil, there are dozens of blocks of land, homes and businesses, all of Childe st and access to the beach at Manfred st that would be lost. And what about the tourist dollars that Belongil brings in. There is low cost accommodation here right through to rental properties that attract international celebrities to Byron bay and raise our profile and bring diversity to the area. I am sure there were once birds and animals of all types living on your property too – but thankfully this is not North Korea – so the government can’t simply take property away from people because a few people in the community would like them to. People love Belongil as it is. They could choose Tyagarah if they wanted miles and miles of wide and pristine beach – but many many people actually prefer the vibrancy of Belongil. The homes, people, businesses and accommodation make it what it is. People congregate behind or on the existing rocks. Byron is a great place because of its diversity. Belongil is part of that. Which is why the community once banded together to protect it, building walls from tree stumps and then the Byron Erosion Trust wall in 1976. The sand comes and goes. So what is the problem? This started as the council trying to limit liability, but certain green councillors have shifted the argument into something quite destructive and sinister.

  2. David,

    Build a sea wall to protect an enclave of wealth and thereby protect Byron Bay’s social diversity?

    If you want social diversity you must be against paid parking, which hollowed out the town overnight.

    Oops, paid parking revenue is paying for the sea wall.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Autocracy or democracy for Byron Shire?

The New Yorker Magazine recently wrote a quote from Mr Rupert Murdoch ‘The truth is authoritarian governments do work!’ Hold that thought. It has been...

Criminalising protest

In another Sstate government descent into criminalising protest, to protect their own government’s sabotage of a liveable planet, last Thursday new laws were passed...

Mullum pods

First, Hans Lovejoy’s article ‘emergency wedged’ was educational, factual and provided valuable information to the community. Michele Grant’s letter (27 July) was emotive overgeneralisations...

Flood residents get $650 from Lismore Council

Lismore City Mayor Steve Krieg today announced that 1,558 residents will receive a grant of $650 from the Lismore Flood Appeal.