21 C
Byron Shire
June 3, 2023

Burden all on Byron ratepayers

Latest News

Getting Real About The Voice

Responding to Ian Pratt in an attempt to ‘get real about the Voice’. The proposal does not challenge the...

Other News

Traffic interruptions around Lismore Base Hospital – Sunday

Some streets will be blocked off and others reduced to one lane on Sunday 4 June around Lismore Base Hospital and Lismore Shopping Square.

Biblical misogyny

In the time of Jesus as per the accounts in the Bible, all women were lowly handmaidens, they were,...

Backlash Stan Grant

Extraordinary negative and callous statements regarding Stan Grant in the recent edition’s Backlash section. Grant was a terrible host?...

Search and rescue exercises in Ballina this weekend

Marine Rescue NSW will take part in the first of three regional Search and Rescue Exercises (SAREX) on the NSW North Coast at Ballina this weekend.

Byron’s favourite block party

Australian roots legends, The Beautiful Girls, will headline Stone & Wood’s winter block party, Festival of the Stone, when...

Dance and escape at the Nudge

Dance and escape before their winter break at June’s Nudge Nudge Wink Wink: The Ultimate Party with a Conscience! The party of the year...

Who is funding our future?

In order to be ‘Fit for the Future’ the state government required Byron Shire Council to impose a rate rise in order to balance its budget, otherwise there was a risk of our shire being amalgamated with other councils.

This threat has been reduced with the backlash against mandatory amalgamations that were brought in by the Baird government. However, council still needs funds for the shortfall in the budget.

So now we are being asked to pay a 33.55 per cent increase in our rates over the next four years.

The vast majority of the total rates in this shire come from residential ratepayers, 76 per cent of them last year according to council’s fact sheet and website.

Council has restructured the rating categories for the coming year so that businesses will be paying slightly higher rates, 1.6 per cent more than previously, comprising 21 per cent of the total yield.

Farmland will be paying 0.6 per cent more, 5 per cent of the total. Therefore residential rates will decrease proportionally by 2.2 per cent to 74 per cent of the total yield next year.

Presumably this restructure is aimed at making the residents feel joyful about the 33.5 per cent rate hike that we are now facing. Oh and don’t forget to add on the $50 parking levy and the Fire and Emergency Services Levy, that should cover the difference.

But hang on, what is the increased revenue being spent on? Referring again to Council’s factsheet ‘in the first year… it is estimated council will raise an additional $1.185 million and this will be spent on infrastructure maintenance and renewal’.

The supposed 2.2 per cent decrease in the residential rate share will attempt to allay any concerns the community may have about the burden of funding infrastructure for 33,000 residents and the 2 million tourists to the shire each year.

A mere 15,300 ratepayers are paying for the community’s infrastructure shortfall, which cannot keep pace with the high impact of tourism in this shire.

According to council, the tourist usage represents 30 per cent% of the demand on the infrastructure budget. For many years residents have tried unsuccessfully to get a bed tax or similar, so that tourists can start paying their fair share for the wear and tear on our infrastructure.

It all comes to nothing, as it’s a state government decision, which it refuses to implement. The majority of tourists to Byron shire now are day trippers, so they wouldn’t contribute to a bed tax.

Why aren’t special dispensations for taxing and/or funds made available by the state government for highly visited tourist areas with a low resident base?

Why isn’t the NSW government diverting the funding that they use to promote tourism in Byron shire into the crucial provision and maintenance of our dilapidated infrastructure?

There is a total lack of vision in resolving this problem. It seems that the buck stops with us as ratepayers.

We cover the shortfall created by the exponential growth of tourism in this shire, which increased by 500,000 people last year.

According to the Government’s Tourism Research Australia website, in 2015 tourists spent over half a billion dollars in Byron Shire.

The council only gets a tiny fraction of this from business rates, in exchange for providing roads, waste removal, water, sewerage, stormwater management etc. Is that fair?

It’s time our state politicians and/or the businesses who benefit directly from tourism, come up with a solution for this problem.

What about an infrastructure fund to keep pace with their incessant promotion of Byron as a destination?

Ratepayers and our local MP Tamara Smith need to pressure the state government for this funding or the burden on ratepayers will keep increasing into the future.

Kathryn McConnochie, Byron Bay





Support The Echo

Keeping the community together and the community voice loud and clear is what The Echo is about. More than ever we need your help to keep this voice alive and thriving in the community.

Like all businesses we are struggling to keep food on the table of all our local and hard working journalists, artists, sales, delivery and drudges who keep the news coming out to you both in the newspaper and online. If you can spare a few dollars a week – or maybe more – we would appreciate all the support you are able to give to keep the voice of independent, local journalism alive.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Police compassion

Mandy, you said (Echo, 17 May)]: ‘There’s not many 95-year-olds I wouldn’t be able to overpower if necessary’ and ‘to disarm a 95-year-old with...


It is with great concern and disappointment, but not surprising, we have to declare that the brief hope we had for a nuclear-weapons-free future,...

Israel’s formation

In his apologia for Israel, what Danny Wakil failed to mention about Israel’s formation is significant.  From his description you’d think the founding of Israel...

Backlash Stan Grant

Extraordinary negative and callous statements regarding Stan Grant in the recent edition’s Backlash section. Grant was a terrible host? Grant made the show unwatchable?...