11.7 C
Byron Shire
September 25, 2021

Future of the Belongil and the stealthy increase in sewage capacity

Latest News

Fundraising for koala signs for Bangalow

As the koala mating season has started, Bangalow Koalas has set up fundraising to create incorporate more koala road signs. Bangalow...

Other News

Mandy Nolan’s Soapbox: We are not for sale

It seems content creators are running out of ideas to make cheap TV. It’s amazing what you can come up with when you lose your ethics! Here’s a few quick pitches: How about a show about chubby rich women trying to drop weight by living in Ethiopia with a malnourished family for six weeks? No?

Cartoon of the week – 22 September, 2021

We love to receive letters, but not every letter will be published; the publication of letters is at the discretion of the online and print letters editors.

Speech pathology student numbers soar at SCU

The number of domestic applications for the undergraduate speech pathology course at Southern Cross University have increased 79 per cent compared to the same time last year.

Equitable allocation

In properly-scrutinised vaccination rollouts it is to be expected that vaccines are used as a device to protect the...

Byron Shire Councillors vote to raise CBD height

The developers of 33 Lawson Street, Byron Bay, came to last week’s Council meeting asking for permission to breach the building height limit in Central Byron by 38 per cent.

Biggest corporate greenwashers revealed by Greenpeace

According to a new analysis by Greenpeace, most of Australia’s highest-emitting companies that have implemented net-zero emission commitments do not have any will to meet their target.

Dead prawns in the Belongil Estuary.
Photos supplied

David Pont

The revival of debate about how the Belongil estuary is to be managed has been sparked by Council’s plan to ‘short-circuit’ treated effluent through the Byron Arts and Industry Estate, in response to complaints by a few landholders about excess water. Many of Byron Bay’s problems involve water and are closely connected, whether acid sulfate fish kills, or stormwater flooding in the central business district (CBD), or management of the sewage treatment plant (STP) effluent.

We can begin to unpack it by first looking at some hard facts: the lifespan of the current STP and Effluent Management Strategy ends in 2025, and the need to plan for whatever comes after that means some tricky decisions in the next couple of years. Second, Council has commissioned a number of studies since 2015 that have procured an EPA licence for the new effluent pipe and drain.

40% more effluent

I’ve examined these documents and assess most of the work as capable, some very good as far as they went, but the overall approach was deeply flawed by limited briefs and a failure to deal strategically with some fundamental problems that will become clearer as time goes on. In particular, an effluent increase of over 40 per cent was quietly tacked on to the new drain.

All these recent studies support the main thrust of what was achieved in the early 2000s. Let’s look at what went down in that period in developing the current Strategy, valid until 2025. I focus mainly on the two biggest issues: the artificial opening of the estuary, and the reuse of effluent in regeneration wetlands. I point out here that my contribution to this discussion is simply as a volunteer professional witness clarifying what the community needs to start thinking about. I don’t need a job.

Jarosite impact on the Belongil drains.
Photos supplied

A little history

The Belongil Estuary Management Plan (2001) was commissioned by Council and the State government. Peter Parker and I synthesized the information and understanding from intensive research and on-ground observation of the many fish kills in the 1990s. We presented the results to the community in a practical plan for the next period, meant to be for about 4–5 years under the NSW Estuary Program. The Plan was very widely and intensively consulted and agreed by all parties. It wasn’t simply a ‘Council’ output or individual opinion.

The Plan adopted two major changes: lower the artificial opening height from 1.2 metres to 1.0 metre, primarily to stop the fish kills and stabilise the situation, and secondly make progress on addressing the major pollution impacts of acid sulfate soils (ASS) and other lesser pollution.


We all recognised the need for an ecology as close as possible to ‘natural’, but it was clear the Belongil, over the last 130 years, had become a highly modified place. For example, when the estuary height is at 1.2 metres or more, there’s very little space for a subsequent flood. Drainage from the CBD, already suffering from inadequate flow paths after many decades of harder surfaces and more pipes, also becomes an issue. Some have advocated stopping opening the estuary altogether, letting it rise to some notional ‘natural historic’ high level. Good luck on that one.

Some of the dangers in lowering the opening height were obvious: potential changes in the ecology over time, possibly a lower impetus to reduce Byron Bay’s overall flood risk, and my own biggest fear was that development would creep downwards, making future remediation more difficult.

There were no fish kills after 2002, until a new Opening Strategy was recently adopted, with the result that there have been two fish kills in two years. The opening height has risen again without much done about the acid sulfate drains (‘Acid sulfate drains’ is an abbreviation for the 40+ km of drains in the lowlands that dry out the peaty soils and cause the chemical reaction that produces sulfuric acid that in turn dissolves the metals, mainly iron and aluminium, that then flow into the estuary, causing a toxic soup that kills everything) so it seems the old lessons will need to be learned again. Sulfuric acid and toxic metals are being generated right now in the lowland soils, and when the La Niña rains arrive this will flow into the estuary. Also, Council’s new effluent plan will now add major flows much closer to the entrance, raising the issue of the Belongil mouth becoming permanently open just to let effluent out.

Draining floodwater. Photo supplied.

Effluent reuse

The community clearly decided in the late 1990s that reuse of effluent was far preferred to an ocean outfall or discharge to the estuary. A detailed analysis of reuse in agriculture turned up some realities, listed in Council’s current Recycled Water Management Strategy, 2017–2027: Limited irrigation in wet and cool periods; shallow water tables or unsuitable soils; and reliance on private users reduces Council’s ability to manage, adapt and maximise recycled water use. In the Brunswick Valley farm scheme, over twenty years, only eight per cent is being reused.

A rule of thumb in our region for estimating reuse demand on farms is to allow six megalitres of effluent per hectare per year. Meaning, you take the total effluent production over a year and divide by six to roughly estimate the land area required. For example Byron’s ultimate load to year 2025 of about 2,500 megalitres, divided by six means a total required area of over 400 hectares. Then there’s the massive dam needed to store the effluent for up to six months. And the pipes and pumping to move the effluent to the sites. I’ve never heard of anyone paying for effluent, so it’s all a heavy sunk cost for the community.

In response to these facts, all the people involved, on and in Council, committees and the State government took a look at trials we had set up on unused Council land near the STP, and the 24-hectare trial project evolved. It became heavily engineered with pumps and pipes, and very dense plantings leading to high set-up costs, but the Federal government provided most of the funds. We would do it differently today, using gravity flow and low-intensity regeneration methods, but the concept is proven. There would be big benefits from reusing effluent, acid sulfate control, ‘blue carbon’ sequestration, reducing the stormwater threat to Byron Bay, and others.

The wetlands have taken up 23 per cent of Byron’s annual effluent to date, but I believe this is an over estimation, amounting to ten megalitres per hectare. Urban reuse takes another 15 per cent, but this is not expected to increase. Meaning more wetlands are needed if this form of reuse is pursued. Further, I recommend a 2018 video by Martin Selecki, featuring Mayor Simon Richardson, in which the mayor offers complete and eloquent support for the wetlands solution to the Belongil problems, including expansion to 120 hectares.


So here we are. In summary the community needs to think about a number of questions:

• Council’s land use planners have said a 43 per cent increase in development is on the cards. Does the community want this?

• One of the issues around helping to answer this is – can the treated effluent be sustainably managed? The options include: (1) expanding the wetlands reuse scheme to at least 400 hectares for complete reuse in the catchment for the benefits explained above; (2) look at achieving more agricultural reuse; (3) an ocean outfall; or (4) potable reuse – that is, highly treated effluent for community reuse.

There are other problems to consider, such as the condition of the constructed wetlands that, in conjunction with the STP, have produced the highest quality effluent in Australia. It’s unhelpful to use terms like ‘dumping sewage’ or ‘shit’ because it undermines the credibility of the argument with the responsible authorities who know it’s not true. Issues such as the presence of viruses and endocrine disruptors should be looked at as well. Finally, how long do we tolerate the odious drains in our wetlands that are killing our fisheries, year in and year out?   

Support The Echo

Keeping the community together and the community voice loud and clear is what The Echo is about. More than ever we need your help to keep this voice alive and thriving in the community.

Like all businesses we are struggling to keep food on the table of all our local and hard working journalists, artists, sales, delivery and drudges who keep the news coming out to you both in the newspaper and online. If you can spare a few dollars a week – or maybe more – we would appreciate all the support you are able to give to keep the voice of independent, local journalism alive.


  1. Any connection to the reactivication of the Belongil Drainage Board /Union drain system a couple of years ago that affects the industrial estate and Belongil drainage ?


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Nuclear Submarines – just a foot in the door

In the next few months we will hear a lot about how superior nuclear-powered submarines are. Vice Admiral Mike Noonan is even claiming superior stealth characteristics – which is simply not true. Yes, they tend to be faster. This is great if you want to go thousands of kilometres in a matter of days. But they are also much more expensive.

Compost back on Lismore’s gardening menu

Lismore City Council says that their BIOCycle Compost is again on sale from the Lismore Recycling & Recovery Centre and Nimbin Transfer Station, after a two-year break.

Tony’s reflections as king of the Macadamia Castle

Looking back on 14 years at the Macadamia Castle, Tony Gilding says the important things to him were the conservation of the animals and the development of staff.

Getting annoyed with NSW Farmers naming ‘rights’

The Annoying Vegan has become more annoyed today with what they see as the NSW Farmers getting on their high horse about the use of the words ‘meat’ and ‘milk’.