14.9 C
Byron Shire
June 3, 2023

The earliest unequivocally modern human remains in Africa

Latest News

Getting Real About The Voice

Responding to Ian Pratt in an attempt to ‘get real about the Voice’. The proposal does not challenge the...

Other News

Revisiting Aquarius: where we have been and where we need to go

It was ‘far out’ to be in Nimbin again for the 50th celebration of the Aquarius Festival. 

Lennox Head Trojans find their winning mojo

The Lennox Head Trojans have turned their season around with back-to-back wins in the Far North Coast Rugby Unions’...

Byron Council compliance staff bolstered

Are the van campers of Brunswick Heads thoughtless travellers with no respect for the town and its inhabitants, or are many in fact local homeless folk looking for a safe space with toilets and running water?

Théo’s family mark fourth year of his disappearance  

Today is the fourth anniversary of the disappearance of Théo Hayez, an 18-year-old Belgian backpacker who was last seen leaving Cheeky Monkeys bar in Byron Bay at around 11pm on May 31, 2019.

Call for rails on the steep slope of Tweed rail trail after cyclist’s fall

On Sunday a 75 year-old man fell down the steep side of the Tweed section of the Northern Rivers Rail Trail near Crabbes Creek and breaking his hip. 

Francisco’s table

A thick hunk of toasted sourdough, a joyous tumble of braised tomatoey capsicum and onion and beans, a perfect fried egg to crest it all – and there it is on the counter waiting for whoever ordered it and I’m so tempted to claim it!

The Omo Kibish Formation in southwestern Ethiopia, within the East African Rift valley. The region is an area of high volcanic activity, and a rich source of early human remains and artefacts such as stone tools.

Brought to you by The Echo and Cosmos Magazine

There may be earlier remains of modern humans – but science is certain about these ones.

A quarter of a million years ago, the East African Rift zone was a fertile causeway, where ample rainfall collected in basins among the hills, and fertile soils were laced with ash from a series of active volcanoes. This region is also thought to be the birthplace of our species, Homo sapiens, based on a rich nexus of archaeological sites.

Now, scientists have dated a famous set of remains from the rift zone in Ethiopia, known as Omo I, firmly identifying them as the oldest modern human remains in eastern Africa, and the oldest unquestioned evidence of H. sapiens in the world.

It’s probably no coincidence that our earliest ancestors lived in such a geologically active rift valley – it collected rainfall in lakes, providing fresh water and attracting animals, and served as a natural migration corridor stretching thousands of kilometres, says Clive Oppenheimer, a volcanologist at Cambridge University, UK, who is attempting to date volcanic eruptions from the region at the time of our species’ origins.

The volcanoes provided fantastic materials to make stone tools and from time to time we had to develop our cognitive skills when large eruptions transformed the landscape.

The Omo I remains were uncovered in the late 1960s, and have been the subject of intense debate; scientists have attempted to date them precisely using the layers of volcanic ash found above and below the sediments in which they lay.

Earlier attempts to date the fossils placed them at less than 200,000 years old, but a new study in Nature from researchers at Cambridge has pushed back their origin story.

The generally accepted age of the Omo fossils is under 200,000 years, but there’s been a lot of uncertainty around this date, says lead author Céline Vidal, from Cambridge’s Department of Geography. ‘The fossils were found in a sequence, below a thick layer of volcanic ash that nobody had managed to date with radiometric techniques because the ash is too fine-grained.

Vidal’s new work on the Omo remains is part of an epic four-year effort among her colleagues and led by Oppenheimer to date all the major volcanic eruptions in the Ethiopian Rift around the time H. sapiens emerged, in a period known as the late Middle Pleistocene.

Geological sleuthing to date modern human origins

To date each eruption, the researchers collected rock samples from the deposits and ground them down to sub-millimetre size. Once ground down, the rocks from each eruption carry unique chemical fingerprints that identify their point of origin.

Each eruption has its own fingerprint – its own evolutionary story below the surface, which is determined by the pathway the magma followed, says Vidal. Once you’ve crushed the rock, you free the minerals within, and then you can date them, and identify the chemical signature of the volcanic glass that holds the minerals together.

The Omo fossils are found within a layer of ash known as the Kamoya Hominin Site (KHS) ash. By undertaking a new geochemical analysis, researchers linked this layer to the eruption of the Shala volcano, some 400 kilometres away. Pumice samples from that volcano were then dated to 230,000 years ago, meaning the human remains enclosed beneath the ash layer must be older.

First I found there was a geochemical match, but we didn’t have the age of the Shala eruption, says Vidal. I immediately sent the samples of Shala volcano to our colleagues in Glasgow so they could measure the age of the rocks. When I received the results and found out that the oldest Homo sapiens from the region was older than previously assumed, I was really excited.

The contested nature of human origins

The origin of our species is a hotly debated topic in science. While the researchers say their hominin is the oldest uncontested evidence of H. sapiens, there are older fossils that are thought to belong to our species, though these are often subject to intense debate.

These include the remarkable discovery of what looks like a modern human from a 300,000-year-old site in Morocco.

Unlike other Middle Pleistocene fossils, which are thought to belong to the early stages of the Homo sapiens lineage, Omo I possesses unequivocal modern human characteristics, such as a tall and globular cranial vault and a chin, says co-author Aurélien Mounier, from the Musée de l’Homme in Paris. The new date estimate, de facto, makes itthe oldest unchallenged Homo sapiens in Africa.

And while this study sets a new minimum age for H. sapiens in Africa, the authors say new discoveries may yet push our origin story further back in time.

Our forensic approach provides a new minimum age for Homo sapiens in eastern Africa, but the challenge still remains to provide a cap, a maximum age, for their emergence, which is widely believed to have taken place in this region, says co-author Professor Christine Lane, head of the Cambridge Tephra Laboratory where much of the work was carried out. It’s possible that new finds and new studies may extend the age of our species even further back in time.

We can only date humanity based on the fossils that we have, so it’s impossible to say that this is the definitive age of our species, agrees Vidal. The study of human evolution is always in motion: boundaries and timelines change as our understanding improves. But these fossils show just how resilient humans are: that we survived, thrived and migrated in an area that was so prone to natural disasters.


This article was originally published on Cosmos Magazine and was written by Amalyah Hart. Amalyah Hart is a science journalist based in Melbourne.

Support The Echo

Keeping the community together and the community voice loud and clear is what The Echo is about. More than ever we need your help to keep this voice alive and thriving in the community.

Like all businesses we are struggling to keep food on the table of all our local and hard working journalists, artists, sales, delivery and drudges who keep the news coming out to you both in the newspaper and online. If you can spare a few dollars a week – or maybe more – we would appreciate all the support you are able to give to keep the voice of independent, local journalism alive.


  1. This article does not go very deep into the past as hand tools have been found dating back to 2.6 million years. That means there was an intelligent being a lot more into the past than 200,000 years. It takes intelligence to conceive and to cut a hand tools and to have the motivation to know how to use them.
    Scientists believe that the species Homo Sapien separated from the Apes more that 6 million years ago. And that the Gorillas separated from HomoSapien and receded to go their own way as they are today about 7 to 9 million years ago. So there would have been a Push/Pull sequence. Some Apes would want to push forward and be more intelligent and that is the way they would breed. And the real Apes also would receded and breed to pull away from that forward motion and receded into their own kind and breed that way.
    We are not talking about hundreds of thousands of years but many millions of years. Therefore there would be no precise moment of separation. It is indeed Darwin’s Evolution. To evolve means it is a very slow process. There could have been three or four groups as the brain of the homo sapien evolved. One group could have been an ape with features of an ape but with homo sapien intelligence. Another group with features of homo sapien but with the intelligence of an ape and a few others all mixed up. Certain groups that did not fit would die out until somo sapien had finally evolved separate from the Ape species. That takes millions of years to do that.
    We are talking of an intelligent brain that thinks, a human brain. Our intelligent brain evolved from an animal brain, the brain of an ape.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Police compassion

Mandy, you said (Echo, 17 May)]: ‘There’s not many 95-year-olds I wouldn’t be able to overpower if necessary’ and ‘to disarm a 95-year-old with...


It is with great concern and disappointment, but not surprising, we have to declare that the brief hope we had for a nuclear-weapons-free future,...

Israel’s formation

In his apologia for Israel, what Danny Wakil failed to mention about Israel’s formation is significant.  From his description you’d think the founding of Israel...

Backlash Stan Grant

Extraordinary negative and callous statements regarding Stan Grant in the recent edition’s Backlash section. Grant was a terrible host? Grant made the show unwatchable?...