Mia Armitage* with Fernando de Freitas
Sovereign citizens: by now, thanks to debates and protests over public health orders and COVID-19 vaccinations in Australia, you’re probably aware of the term and associated movement.
You might also have learned of the term’s origins in the United States and have heard about its connections to today’s alt-right politics.
But how are sovereign citizens regarded under Australian law? Can we really tell authorities we ‘don’t consent’ to rules around mask-wearing, public gatherings or, as was more common before the pandemic, traffic and drug offences, and be excused?
The person known as David Heilpern
What if we distance ourselves from the name on our identification records, saying instead ‘the person known as…. [insert legal name here]’ when dealing with bodies we consider corporations (like the government, the police and courts)?
Can we tell a judge we never willingly entered into a contract with these entities and ultimately have our freedoms recognised? Aren’t our rights protected in the constitution?
Definitively not, says former NSW Magistrate and occasional Echo contributor David Heilpern.
In his days as a lawyer, Mr Heilpern fought to make an argument that criminal laws didn’t apply to First Nations people.
He says his arguments failed at every level of court in Australia, despite the well-known absence of a treaty (what you might consider a ‘contract’) between European colonisers and indigenous people.
Mr Heilpern later spent ten years as a magistrate on the Northern Rivers, where he says he encountered a person ‘every week’ in court declaring that laws didn’t include them because they’d signed unilateral contracts removing them from the law’s scope.
The deep southern US racist roots of sovereign citizenship
The sovereign citizens movement became popular enough for magistrates and judges to call for more research to be done and Mr Heilpern was one of those to answer the call, reviewing every case he could find in Australian legal history with the reference and uncovering its American roots.
The former magistrate spoke earlier this month of his experience dealing with sovereign citizens with Bay FM Above the Fray host Fernando de Freitas and the following is a lightly edited transcription of part of that interview.
David Heilpern [DH]: There’s a couple of terrific judgments from its place of origin, which is the deep south of the United States of America, where essentially, a racist right-wing strawman movement started whereby people created this idea of them not being members of community and declaring themselves not to be bound by the laws of where they live.
It was essentially because they didn’t like the laws, as things changed and became more liberal. For example, segregation ended and voting rights for black people occurred. So it is born out of that movement, out of the right-wing, racist movement from the south of the United States.
Former magistrate delivers verdict on sovereign citizens beliefs in Australia: ‘mistaken’
DH: Sovereign citizen core beliefs come from an essential mistake in understanding things about the law: you don’t have to consent to the criminal laws of the state or the Commonwealth applying to you.
It’s a really basic mistake to say, ‘well, if I don’t consent, then the laws don’t apply to me’ and if you think about it logically, for one second, you realise that it is a mistake.
I mean, the laws apply to you by virtue of the fact that the laws apply to you: there’s no opt out or opt in process when it comes to criminal law.
You’re either part of it because of your birth, or you’re part of it by virtue of the laws themselves.
Zero legal basis for sovereign citizens in Australia, says former magistrate
Fernando de Freitas [FDF]: So any of their legal arguments, do any of their legal arguments have any legal basis whatsoever here in Australia?
DH: I want to be very clear and very emphatic about this. There is absolutely no legal basis for any of their core beliefs. None, zero.
The closest I think we’ve come to in the law, taking a whole lot of steps back and going back to the very basics, is Terra Nullius and the Mabo decision.’
Speaking later to The Echo, Mr Heilpern said it was ‘remote and tangential’ to ‘step back in time to change things in comparison’ to what First Nations’ advocates were arguing at the time of the Mabo debate.
Remember: there is no human rights charter in Australia!
FDF: What about discrimination? Is [enforcement of, for example, mask-wearing] a breach of the 1948 charter of human rights as they say?
DH: Well, it’s an interesting thing. I think there’s a mistake that people make when they troll through charters of international rights, that just because Australia’s a signatory to them means that they apply as law in the country.
There needs to be an enabling piece of legislation to trigger those international covenants and international agreements, application within the state or Commonwealth sphere.
For example, charters of human rights have a lot of principles, they have a lot of of recommendations, and Australia has signed them.
That doesn’t mean that they’re the gospel law in Australia.
So, for example, we have signed human rights declarations about the rights of children, the rights of children to be housed, etc.
But that doesn’t stop the government locking up refugees, children refugees, because even though we’ve signed these, we haven’t enacted them and in fact, we’ve enacted laws contrary to them.
If there’s a battle between some International Covenant or agreement we’re a signatory to, the law that’s been enacted wins hands down every time.
Sovereign citizens tested in ‘every level’ of Australian justice system, says Heilpern
FDF:So just to be clear, once again, all of their arguments that they make, have they all been fully tested in Australian courts?
DH:Absolutely. They have. Not only have they been tested, they have been thrown out at every level: at local court; at district court and Supreme Court; at High Court; in the federal jurisdiction, in the Federal Magistrates Court and again, in the High Court; in tribunals around Australia as well, like NCAT within New South Wales or QCAT within Queensland.
They have been thrown out every single time they’ve been raised.
I go periodically to their websites, where this material is discussed, and I’ve read the claims of some of the organisations that say, ‘we’ve represented this person and they had a win because they didn’t need a driver’s license in Victoria’.
It’s all utter garbage and when you go looking for the actual cases, or any real reported decisions- I’m not talking about anecdotal reports, I’m talking about decisions that are reported in the law reports- they’re not there.
They just don’t exist.
There is a great fraud taking place against the community on these websites that claim that sovereign citizenship works in courts around the country because it never has, it never will and it doesn’t.
‘Worthless’ sovereign citizen kits defrauding real-life citizens online
FDF:What do you mean by fraud? What is going on here?
DH: I’ve seen websites where they’re charging people for so-called ‘sovereignty kits’: where people pay money, they get a kit that enables them or gives them the tools to declare themselves and sign the binding contracts and challenge the constitutional ability of courts to make their determinations and indicate that they’re not part of the corporation.
These kits are worthless, are completely valueless, and to pretend that they give anybody the ability to win court cases is fraudulent in the sense that it is taking money from people for nothing.’
Case dismissals unlikely to refer to sovereign citizens, ex-magistrate says
The Echo spoke to Mr Heilpern after his interview with Bay FM and asked him to respond to allegations official law reports omitted cases that were dismissed and featured sovereign citizens.
‘Not all cases are reported, that’s true,’ Mr Heilpern said, ‘but if anybody had a case dismissed on the basis of sovereign citizenship that would certainly be reported because that would be historic and would change the fundamental system of how the criminal justice system works’.
Mr Heilpern said the commonly known ‘Section 10’ law in NSW gave magistrates and judges the power to find people guilty of certain offences in certain circumstances but to effectively excuse them by not recording the conviction and not requiring them to serve any sentence or pay any fines.
He said it was possible some people viewed the Section 10 cases as examples of sovereign citizens successfully circumventing the law but explained they were usually reserved for first-time offenders, like teenagers smuggling cannabis into music festivals.
‘It’s not a dismissal in the sense of any acceptance of the sovereign citizens’ arguments,’ he said.
Common by name, common by law
The Echo also asked Mr Heilpern what the significance of so-called ‘common law’ was in comparison to the law we hear being enforced.
‘Common law is traditionally known as judge-made law,’ Mr Heilpern said, ‘but obviously a judge-made law yields to legislation, so common law exists alongside legislation’.
‘Ccommon law yields to legislation,’ Mr Heilpern said.
*Mia Armitage is a Bay FM member. Listen to this interview here.
Even Amazon sell the sovereign citizens kits … FFS – what next?
Wow Alison, who knew! I have ordered one to check it out. Amazing.
It’s amazing that people have to be told that obvious nonsense is actually nonsense. There is freedom to be a fool but there’s no requirement for others to accept your foolish beliefs.
Sovereign citizen is just another way to describe selfish, ignorant right wing nutters.
LOL Look in the mirror SLAVE
Love it LOL
What does this garbage mean?
“Sovereign citizens: by now, thanks to debates and protests over public health orders and COVID-19 vaccinations in Australia, you’re probably aware of the term and associated movement.”
We are not in the United States as the sovereign citizen movement looks at the local sheriff to be the absolute law they abide by.
In Australia a Sovereign is a silver 20-cent piece, so a Sovereign citizen is someone who has 20 cents.
What debates? There has been no debates in the Northern Rivers. There have been no protests in the Northern Rivers. What term? There was a book, “For the Term of his Natural Life” about convicts. The associated movement was to become a Free Settler.
A Sovereign is a gold coin equal to one Australian Pound in value
I’ve recently lost a schoolfriend who I’ve known for over 50 years to the unfathomable sovereign citizen/ anticvax / covid denial way of thinking.
They were one I always thought exhibited a intelligence far superior to mine but now there’s nothing left between us except unspoken words that will never be uttered and a cold glaring emptiness where once there was warmth and laughter.
I feel very sad indeed about the current wierdness and wackiness lately impacting us all, and in particular the sorrowful and negative changes it has wrought our relationship 😔
To all of the selfish self-centred people that my once friend now shares ranks with… Do right by your fellow humans you lot starting now! I’m heartily sick of your peace destroying, disturbing mindless bullshit!
The inventor of the mRNA vaccine technology agrees with your friend. Maybe you are right and he does exhibited intelligence far superior to yours.
Ah yes, Malone, the latest False Prophet of the deluded pseudoconservative set. His Hubris has Damned him once to the detriment of All, and he charges on, determined to Damn himself again with his false Service of the ‘public good’. We who see clearly recognise his good Conscience ‘world tour’ for what it is: performative moralising from a prideful egomaniac who feels denied his rightful place in history and would have it in any form it takes. No wonder they love him, he’s just like them, worshipping at his own sad little altar of Self.
You haven’t read anything he wrote, have you? You just regurgitate ad hominem and slander you read somewhere else. I’ve noticed it’s a common trend among the posturing pseudo-intellects that think the world owes them a living to attack the messenger and ignore the message. He wrires prolifically on substack. You can search for him there, read something and come back when you can prove he’s wrong. Otherwise, you’re just another clown who’s lucky they haven’t bern injured by an experimental gene therapy… yet. Wait until you’re up to booster number six. If you make it that far. You’ve been conned.
It’s odd to see the Echo attempting to tar anti vaxxer types with the brush of ‘deep Southern US racists’. I’m can’t imagine many Mullum alternative lifestylers would understand or appreciate the crude smear. I suspect that their ideas about freedom and the dangers of an over reaching authority stem more from a left wing anarchist or collectivist tradition rather than the KKK.
I don’t doubt the legal advice is sound but trying to shame Covid sceptics with the racist card is a bit McCarthyite.
Wait hold up. I don’t think the Northern Rivers anti-science anti-vaxx could be called left wing at all. Anarchist, sure, but left wing certainly not since Facebook and the alt-right misinformation invaded your movement. Collectivist? Collectivist culture would place higher emphasis on protecting those in the community, therefore abiding by public health orders for the sake of their fellow humans. The Rainbogans of the Northern Rivers are the most selfish nutjobs out there where the Q cults have run rife. Conspiracy thinking has destroyed you.
Wow… you just made an incredible set of connective leaps to foster your own sense of victimhood. Heilpern is reminding you of the origins of the Strawman movement. He also is connecting that movement with the Anti-vax because it IS connected via the demography alone, if not the delusional mindset that fuel it.
Anyone got a 2nd hand sovereign citizen kit they want to sell, lol. Actually, I feel sorry for anyone duped by this.
It’s most unfortunate that Australian armchair lawyers, in their ignorance, embrace every half-cocked American idea as though it were applicable to Australia.
Just because it’s on the idiot box doesn’t make it true or relevant.
To insist otherwise is merely to continue the grovel to a major culture that is not ours.
Get over it and get real! We live under the laws of Australia – like it or not.
Thank you, DH, for once more shedding some clear light on the nonsense of ‘sovereign citizenry’.
Next time you renew your driver license and they ask you to sign, read what you are signing. It’s a contract that says you agree to be subject to their legislation. If you make a Centrelink claim, get an explosives license, register your kids for school….or just about anything, they get you to sign a contract that asks your permission for you to be under their rules. If you murder someone, you don’t have to have signed anything, you don’t have to be a citizen, they don’t need to know your name even. Murder is covered under common law, not legislation. No one has a problem with common law.
“Sovereign citizen” is an oxymoron invented by the FBI in the 90s. What they are looking for is on their passport.. “Australia Citizen/National”. Do you know the difference between a citizen and a national?
Oh, and I live in the Commonwealth of Australia. Ever get a letter from “The Commonwealth of Australia”, I bet you haven’t.
I agree, the Television is opinions used to get viewers for Ad revenue. No law that their opinion has the be factually correct. They just read the associated press feed for most of it.
Have to burst your bubble mate but there is no Commonwealth of Australia because we are living in Terra Australis, Australia is a registered corporation and is Norfolk Island. People need to stop fucking around with stupidity and really do your homework we all need to break the lying chain we are slaves to and become Terra Australis nationals.
There is an Australian Law firm called
If you have any problems about mandatory jabs, or fines for not wearing a mask etc, they claim it’s not enforceable and will fight the courts for your freedom. FREE OF CHARGE
I suggest you get in as fast as you can. Once they start losing case after case I reckon the free option will disappear real quick. Did you not read any of the above article – none of this nonsense has any legal standing at all.
I’ll just point out the constitution say the govt can’t make you do anything medical. It’s called civil conscription. Yes the High Court has ruled on it.
Vaccines are not mandatory. There is no mandate for that. Furthermore, there are medical exemptions for masks in my state, I’m assuming all states, and under the privacy act, a person is not required to disclose personal medical information, so I believe they could win.
Apologies, there is recent legislation to mandate vaccination on quarantine workers in Australia. It does not apply to the general population.
A Sovereign coin represents one pound,not twenty cent s
Thanks David, for the clear explanation.
Beware Make sure you don’t publish contrary views. This is like reading Soviet news from the 1950’s .. well done comrades
I don’t think the article tarred anti-vaxxers with the same brush as racists.
Someone commented and mentioned them in the same sentence.
I don’t think there is a one-to-one correlation between those two groups.
However anti-vaxxers seem to ignore science in a similar way to sovereign citizens ignoring law, it seems to be a very similar style of stupid, only believing things that suit your views.
Oh and Bob, dragging out communism, wow you sound American, not something to be proud of.
If you do not answer any questions to police but instead ask them questions, if you can have them answer the question of “Am I a Man (or Am I a Woman)”? and keep asking until they reply yes or not. On the second time you ask you can state that you will only ask them one more time and then you will answer for them, which you go ahead with if they haven’t said yes or no.
But its better if you can get them to answer the question themselves.
After the third time they still haven’t answered, you say that you’re answering for them and that “yes you are a Man (or Woman)”. But because you have stated already that you would only ask “Am I a Man (or Woman)” one more time, then you must keep that word.
You can try then to ask a false dilemma question (a question with only 2 alternative options to choose aka. either/or question). Of “Can you please answer my question, Am I a Man or am I a Woman? (both genders to say) At this point this will make it more likely to get the response you want of: ‘you’re a Man (or you’re a Woman’, and you’ve asked a slightly different question than before.
(important to do what you say you will do).
Now once they have said this congratulations, you have now gone from the public sector and entered the private sector and you can politely BUT firmly state to the police that they have no jurisdiction over you because you’re a living Man (or Woman) and that you will be on your way back to whatever business you were doing before you were interrupted.
This is equity law, and it rules over all legislation and acts.
So Phoenix, are you implying that a person who has just committed a violent robbery can simply go about ‘their business’ by using the above approach? I’m really curious as to whether you believe that everything is above the law, or are there separations?
If you have violated the law, they don’t need your person to lock you up. If you have offended against their legislation you have to agree to be a legal person for them to have jurisdiction over you. If you commit a violent robbery you have just committed two violations of the common law of trespass. They don’t need to bring in their criminal code legislation to compel you to make your victims whole again.
This was a great article and I’m grateful to have read it. David is someone whom I truly trust.
It does make me sad reading all these comments to see how devided we are on these basic issues with in our country right now.
it would be so nice if before you slandered someone whos beliefs you do not agree with that you actually took the time to understand how they came to believe in that. This division in the world is far more the problem than if one chooses to or chooses not to Vaxx or be in agreement with the government.
There is a divide in every single sector of the government, society and cultures in this world. I wonder what would hapen if we worked to seek understanding and mutural respect.
What load of lefty scam spin bullshit 😂😂😂😂 but the sheep will swallow it lol It’s disgusting really
You did read that it stemmed from a right-wing racist group, and it connected with the alt-right, yeah?
They are not looking for a legal status, they are looking for a status in law instead. They need to look on their passport where is says Australian citizen/nation. What’s and Australian National?
The FBI have already admitted they invented in oxymoron “Sovereign Citizen” to mess up the US state militias in the 90s, as the CIA have released the documents showing they invented the term “Conspiracy Theorist” to make people who questioned the assassination of JFK sound nuts.
This article perfectly highlights just how much it doesn’t know about America.
America is a Republic, not a democracy. It’s founding principle states that all men have inalienable rights. There is not one Australian that has inalienable rights because Australia is Godless and only believes in civil privileges. Rights come from God. Governments can only confer ‘privileges’. Privileges can be stripped from the citizens; you have no right to freedom of movement in Australia – that’s a privilege government grants you; you have no right to not wear articles of clothing (masks) that the government says you must wear in Australia; you have no right to leave your house as that, too, is a privilege the government grants Australians. Rights can never be removed from an American. Shady politicians can try but they will fail in a court of law. Recent court win in the Supreme Court of Louisiana removed the ability of the State of Louisiana to lock people out of Churches so now no state in that Union can close churches during times of crisis or emergencies. Eventually court cases will proceed that will make all lockdown measures unconstitutional.
Australians will only ever dream about what freedom is.
As for ‘sovereign citizen’ you even have that wrong. Yes, there are bogus ‘sovereign citizen’ movements but those were started by the three letter agencies. The Warren court ruled that all American citizens are sovereign.
“What is this Government, whose power is here being asserted? And what is the source of that power? The answers are the foundation of our Republic. To secure the inalienable rights of the individual, “Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed.” I do not believe the passage of time has lessened the truth of this proposition. It is basic to our form of government. This Government was born of its citizens, it maintains itself in a continuing relationship with them and, in my judgment, it is without power to sever the relationship that gives rise to its existence. I cannot believe that a government conceived in the spirit of ours was established with power to take from the people their most basic right . . . with power to decree this fate. The people who created this government endowed it with broad powers. They created a sovereign state with power to function as a sovereignty. But the citizens themselves are sovereign, and their citizenship is not subject to the general powers of their government.”
There isn’t a judge in Australia that could speak as Warren did, that believes in the sovereignty or supremacy of the People.
Australians didn’t create their government, talking heads did. And those talking heads created a quasi-monarchy socialist democratic system that must deny freedom to the people of Australia because Australians are still subjects. And Australians will remain serfs because that is what the majority choose to be.
Man created god in His image
Have you ever thought that there left winged, wingnuttted way of thinking I’d because they have woken up to the fact that we all have no human rights! we have no freedom!
“The way to make a good slave is to make them belive they are not a salve at all but free men”
💯 to the antivaxers at least there are some people alive not so dumb as to shove a needle in there arm for some thing like the flue a “virus” which CAN NOT have a nor ever has had a cure for or vaccine to help fight against.
It was once common knowledge that you can not make a vaccine for a virus… but we forget
Once apon a time things like laws of human rights and the laws of the constitution were taught.
Not any more.. and we forget
But then how can you forget when you are not taught.
Little by little they take things away just enough to be annoying but not so much to draw to much attention..
You get annoyed, you get used to it, you forget…..then a little more.
Why should I loose the right to work to feed my family because I am awake
Ohh that’s right because I have NO rights because I am a slave just like everyone else here bound under so called laws that haven’t even passed all necessary steps to become a law and that directly violate or contradict the constitution.
Stop watching the brain washing completely controlled and censored tv and pull ya face off face book and listening to all the radio so called news and think for your selves
We are all just chickens in a cage
GOD!! the idea is nice but …
in the first ever written language the meanings of words are (Adam=man Eve=woman worship=work for) but we forget…. we are but slaves
Therefore say to them, ‘This is what the Sovereign Lord says: None of my words will be delayed any longer; whatever I say will be fulfilled, declares the Sovereign Lord.’
For I take no pleasure in the death of anyone, declares the Sovereign Lord. Repent and live!
Surely the Sovereign Lord does nothing without revealing his plan to his servants the prophets.
The Spirit of the Sovereign Lord is on me, because the Lord has anointed me to proclaim good news to the poor. He has sent me to bind up the brokenhearted, to proclaim freedom for the captives and release from darkness for the prisoners.
These so called sovereign citizens drive on our roads collect government income through the dole and the pension so yes it’s all uttver bullshit 💯💯 percent 👎😴
It’s not BS because you don’t understand it. If “they” paid tax, they’re entitled to claim the dole and a pension. The refusal to submit to extortion (most fines) and being taken hostage by a group of fake security guards (state or federal police) is an important symbol of resistance to a corrupt and illegal system of control. If you bothered to do some research you’d see the Australian sovereign citizen movement is based on factual historical common law. We aren’t obliged to “stand under” the fraudulent system run by our fake corporate governance, who’re actually fronts for the UN and the organized crime syndicates – the banks and warmongering military – who run them
There is no Sovereign Citizen. It’s actually called your Living Man or Woman status (certificate of live birth). Magistrate and Supreme courts are admiralty courts (maritime / corporate / trust law) and have no jurisdiction over living men and women, unless you identify as the trustee of the trust in which your birth certificate was registered.