I am writing in response to the front-page article in last week’s Echo concerning the proposed Community Title subdivision at 53 McAuleys Lane, Myocum, by Tareeda Developments (DA 10.2023.454.1).
It is imperative that our community remains informed about the issues surrounding this development, especially given the potential impact on McAuleys Lane residents and the broader Shire.
One of the main concerns shared by many in our community is the substantial surge in traffic volumes, particularly here at an already perilous intersection and on a narrow rural road with inherent safety deficiencies. The proposed solution by the developer is inadequate, relying on outdated traffic data and underestimations, ultimately jeopardising access and amenity for existing residents.
During the Council meeting in October 2022, where twenty submissions against the rezoning were presented, promises were made to address the issues raised in the Traffic Impact Assessment (TIA) and Road Safety Audit (RSA) during the subsequent design stage of the DA.
However, it is disheartening to note that Tareeda has resubmitted the same flawed TIA and RSA, ignoring the need for an effective upgrade of the already dangerous intersection of Mullumbimby Road [from Mullum to Uncle Tom’s] and McAuleys Lane.
Despite assurances from the developer’s representative regarding community consultation, our attempts to engage in the process have been ignored. A promised consultation never materialised, and instead, we received a ‘courtesy call’ on 12 December 2023 [telling us] that the DA had been lodged. This lack of consultation reflects a concerning disregard for community input and raises questions about the transparency of the decision-making process.
As a resident with a property adjoining the proposed subdivision, I find it disconcerting that we have not yet received a formal notification from the Council, a legal obligation, which raises concerns about transparency in the approval process.
While recognising the need for increased housing opportunities, the absence of an affordable housing component in the proposal is disappointing.
Moreover, the timing of the DA lodgement, coinciding with the holiday season, raises suspicions about attempts to minimise public scrutiny.
With the submission period open from 11–24 January, it is crucial for concerned citizens to voice their opinions by making a submission once the DA is on exhibition.
Considering the unresolved issues, broken promises, and the importance of this decision, I urge the Council to extend the exhibition period to allow the community adequate time for thorough consideration.
