19.3 C
Byron Shire
April 20, 2024

Council wins in court – large Suffolk Park DA refused

Latest News

Infrastructure for east end of Mullum

Mullumbimby was founded 135 years ago. In the 1960s sewerage was introduced, as was I suppose drainage infrastructure. Are...

Other News

Ballina Greens announce ticket for 2024

Aiming to build on their two existing councillors, the Ballina Greens have announced their team of candidates for the upcoming Ballina Shire Council elections, set for 14 September this year.

Labor leading

A very proactive Minns Labor government will celebrate one year in government with a massive investment of $1.8 billion...

Teenager arrested following an alleged stabbing

A teenager remains in police custody following an alleged stabbing at a church in Sydney’s south-west overnight.


It is, at best, amusing, but mostly disappointing, to see The Echo reporting on the mayoral minute to Council...

Woodburn: ute hits, kills pedestrian

A 30-year-old woman walking in Woodburn died on Sunday morning when a teenager driving a ute crashed into her, police said.

Rural roads need a path to recovery

The recent and continuing rains have turned many of our roads into a sodden mud puddle and the NSW Farmers have renewed calls for real action on road infrastructure funding after continual damage on roads and bridges across the state.

According to www.denwol.com.au, Denwol is owned and controlled by Phillip Wolanski AM.
Photo realestate.com.au

A large mixed-use Suffolk Park DA proposed by Sydney-based property development company Denwol has been rejected in the Land & Environment Court after mediation failed.

The judgement, available at www.caselaw.nsw.gov.au, shows that Denwol made multiple attempts to amend the Clifford Street DA behind closed doors, but were unsuccessful in brokering an agreement. 

Denwol commenced Class 1 proceedings on September 9, 2022, appealing against Council’s refusal. 

Locals said that the DA is an overdevelopment of the site that will lead to further gridlock of roads and is not in line with the character of the area.

Council’s refusal was based in part on the DA having, ‘a serious and irreversible impact on biodiversity values’ and failing ‘to incorporate sufficient measures to avoid or minimise adverse impacts on biodiversity values’. 

Those impacts included retaining ‘an insufficient portion of the existing vegetation which forms part of the Coastal Cypress Pine Forest in the NSW North Coast Bioregion Endangered Ecological Community (EEC) Cypress Pine’. 

‘Further, there is uncertainty of the viability of the trees proposed for retention’.

In December last year, the Suffolk Park Progress Association (SPPA) appealed to councillors to be more engaged with the court process. 

SPPA president, Donald Maughan, told Council at the time, ‘Our Suffolk Park community’s concerns relating to the Land and Environment Court cases are validated by the way the West Byron development went in that same court’. 

‘Decisions were made by staff on advice from Council’s external solicitors, with none of our elected councillors at the table. 

‘That outcome left community with a feeling of capitulation and no representation in the process’. 


With the Denwol case, D Dickson, Commissioner of the Court, found in conclusion that, ‘The likely impacts of the development are unacceptable on merit’.

Among her reasons for refusal, Dickson writes, ‘the applicant has failed to demonstrate in the Biodiversity Development Assessment Report (BDAR) sufficient or appropriate measures to avoid, minimise or mitigate impacts on Coastal Cypress EEC that will arise from the proposed development of the subject site.

‘Pursuant to s 7.16(2) of the BC Act, given the finding that the proposed development is likely to have a serious and irreversible impacts on the Coastal Cypress EEC, the consent authority must refuse consent’.

Support The Echo

Keeping the community together and the community voice loud and clear is what The Echo is about. More than ever we need your help to keep this voice alive and thriving in the community.

Like all businesses we are struggling to keep food on the table of all our local and hard working journalists, artists, sales, delivery and drudges who keep the news coming out to you both in the newspaper and online. If you can spare a few dollars a week – or maybe more – we would appreciate all the support you are able to give to keep the voice of independent, local journalism alive.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Save Wallum now

The Save Wallum campaign has been ongoing and a strong presence of concerned conservationists are on site at Brunswick Heads. How the state planning...

Can Council’s overturn their decisions?

NSW Labor planning minister, Paul Scully, when asked about the Wallum estate by local MP Tamara Smith (Greens)  in parliament on March 20, said,...

The bridges of Ballina Council

Ballina Shire Council has started preliminary investigation works at Fishery Creek Bridge, on River Street, and Canal Bridge, on Tamarind Drive, as part of their plan to duplicate both bridges.

Tweed Council wants your ideas on future sports facilities

Tweed Council is looking for feedback from residents about future plans for sport and recreation in the area.